Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.comp.software.thunderbird > #541
| Subject | Re: Thunderbird ESR version |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.comp.software.thunderbird |
| References | (5 earlier) <xlils4d19m12.dlg@v.nguard.lh> <gm68nhxul8.ln2@spock.lan> <oo5h8mdztd0z.dlg@v.nguard.lh> <q119nhxmbe.ln2@spock.lan> <mmigbhvnh1v7$.dlg@v.nguard.lh> |
| From | dillinger <dillinger@invalid.not> |
| Date | 2021-05-17 15:14 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mq6anhxcnl.ln2@spock.lan> (permalink) |
On 5/17/21 8:11 AM, VanguardLH wrote: > dillinger <dillinger@invalid.not> wrote: > >> On 5/17/21 12:02 AM, VanguardLH wrote: >>> dillinger <dillinger@invalid.not> wrote: >>> >>>> VanguardLH wrote: >>>> >>>>> dillinger <dillinger@invalid.not> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> All of that is about Firefox, we're talking about Thunderbird. >>>>> >>>>> Where does the code for TB come from? Even Andrei noted the >>>>> synchronization between ESR landings of FF to releases of TB. He >>>>> noted some of the statements by Mozilla about the release of TB, as >>>>> did I in another subthread. >>>> >>>> There is no strict syncing between Firefox and Thunderbird versions, >>>> certainly not in release dates. >>> >>> Coming out with a TB release a week or two later than for a first ESR >>> landing for FF is pretty damn close for synchronization, and the say day >>> or in a couple days for incremental (sub-minor) versions is damn close >>> for synchronization. You thought the FF group was in charge of >>> releasing TB? That the TB group can release on the same day as the FF >>> release is impressive. However, they likely only need to include >>> regression testing on the major version release of FF to make sure no >>> problems in adopting the new FF code changes, like for differences in >>> the chrome (GUI) between the two products. >>> >>> The following datestamps taken from the release notes for FF and TB: >>> >>> FF 78.0 : released 30 Jun 2020 >>> TB 78.0 : released 17 Jul 2020 (18 days later) >>> >>> FF 78.0.1 : released 01 Jul 2020 >>> TB 78.0.1 : released 21 Jul 2020 (20 days later) >>> >>> FF 78.1.0 : released 28 Jul 2020 >>> TB 78.1.0 : released 30 Jul 2020 (2 days later) >>> >>> FF 78.2.0 : released 25 Aug 2020 >>> TB 78.2.0 : released 25 Aug 2020 (same day) >>> >>> FF 78.3.0 : released 22 Sep 2020 >>> TB 78.3.0 : released 24 Sep 2020 (2 days later) >>> >>> FF 78.3.1 : released 01 Oct 2020 >>> TB 78.3.1 : released 26 Sep 2020 (6 days later) >>> >>> FF 78.4.0 : released 20 Oct 2020 >>> TB 78.4.0 : released 21 Oct 2020 (1 days later) >>> >>> FF 78.4.1 : released 10 Nov 2020 >>> TB 78.4.1 : released 06 Nov 2020 (4 days later) >>> >>> FF 78.5.0 : released 17 Nov 2020 >>> TB 78.5.0 : released 17 Nov 2020 (same day) >>> >>> FF 78.6.0 : released 15 Dec 2020 >>> TB 78.6.0 : released 15 Dec 2020 (same day) >>> >>> FF 78.6.1 : released 06 Jan 2021 >>> TB 78.6.1 : released 11 Jan 2021 (5 days later) >>> >>> FF 78.7.0 : released 26 Jan 2021 >>> TB 78.7.0 : released 26 Jan 2021 (same day) >>> >>> FF 78.7.1 : released 05 Feb 2021 >>> TB 78.7.1 : released 05 Feb 2021 (same day) >>> >>> FF 78.8.0 : released 23 Feb 2021 >>> TB 78.8.0 : released 23 Feb 2021 (same day) >>> >>> FF 78.9.0 : released 23 Mar 2021 >>> TB 78.9.0 : released 23 Mar 2021 (same day) >>> >>> FF 78.10.0: released 19 Apr 2021 >>> TB 78.10.0: released 19 Apr 2021 (same day) >>> >>> FF 78.10.1: released 04 May 2010 >>> TB 78.10.1: released 04 May 2021 (same day) >>> >>> They ARE synchonized on both release dates AND definitely on code. >>> >> What's not English in strict? Thunderbird is not Firefox. > > Ah, feminine logic. When the argument is lost, try diversion. Deny all > you want. Doesn't change reality. > Wow, did I step on your toes?
Back to alt.comp.software.thunderbird | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Thunderbird ESR version Simon <simon@mydomain.domain> - 2021-05-15 23:59 +0100
Re: Thunderbird ESR version Leala <no@mail.invalid> - 2021-05-15 19:33 -0400
Re: Thunderbird ESR version WaltS48 <schw01@invalid.net> - 2021-05-15 19:44 -0400
Re: Thunderbird ESR version "Andrei Z." <no-email@invalid.invalid> - 2021-05-16 14:14 +0300
Re: Thunderbird ESR version VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2021-05-16 12:15 -0500
Re: Thunderbird ESR version "Andrei Z." <no-email@invalid.invalid> - 2021-05-16 20:36 +0300
Re: Thunderbird ESR version dillinger <dillinger@invalid.not> - 2021-05-16 19:49 +0200
Re: Thunderbird ESR version VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2021-05-16 13:04 -0500
Re: Thunderbird ESR version dillinger <dillinger@invalid.not> - 2021-05-16 21:00 +0200
Re: Thunderbird ESR version VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2021-05-16 17:02 -0500
Re: Thunderbird ESR version dillinger <dillinger@invalid.not> - 2021-05-17 04:29 +0200
Re: Thunderbird ESR version VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2021-05-17 01:11 -0500
Re: Thunderbird ESR version dillinger <dillinger@invalid.not> - 2021-05-17 15:14 +0200
Re: Thunderbird ESR version VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2021-05-17 05:11 -0500
Re: Thunderbird ESR version VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2021-05-15 23:52 -0500
Re: Thunderbird ESR version Martin <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2021-05-16 17:44 +0100
Re: Thunderbird ESR version VanguardLH <V@nguard.LH> - 2021-05-16 12:36 -0500
Re: Thunderbird ESR version Dave Royal<dave@dave123royal.com> - 2021-05-16 19:01 +0000
Re: Thunderbird ESR version Brian Gregory <void-invalid-dead-dontuse@email.invalid> - 2021-05-16 20:11 +0100
Re: Thunderbird ESR version "Andrei Z." <no-email@invalid.invalid> - 2021-05-16 22:25 +0300
Re: Thunderbird ESR version Job Bautista <jobbautista9@aol.com> - 2021-05-17 19:02 +0800
Re: Thunderbird ESR version W <-nospam-@gmail.com> - 2021-06-02 22:51 -0600
csiph-web