Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > sci.physics > #511492

Re: Gravity Forces

Show all headers | View raw

Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/5/15 1:32 PM, reber g=emc^2 wrote:
>>  G=EMC^2
>    This is not a valid equation, reber. It is in fact garbage.

Random associations flashed across the internal screen --
Blish's explanation of the spindizzy equation, etc.
(Uh, oh! And the story about the Dirac transmitter; you can
get lost in these kinds of mazes, so I'll stop that one there).

But my mind's eye settled for more than 1 msec on an old short
story which I'll probably get all wrong because I'm gettin ol
and keep writing "to" for "too" and "two" like I notice some people do
because it's a sign your over 50 and can't tell the diff between
you, your and you're and dont give a shit about spleen generallment.

Anyway. The story:

I guy is accosted by a weirdo in a park one night. Turns out
the weirdo is a time traveller trying to find the person responsible
for the destruction of civilization. 
The guy says it's not him but the traveller explains the collapse
was traced [12-monkeys style; the Bruce v1 did it better -- that series 
my intelligent sat TV hunted up is crap; sorry] to someone that 
came up with an equation I = \pi i exp(\mu) .
It seemed the proving or disproving of the theory behind the formula
resulted in numerous titatic explosions and a lot of ill-feeling all round.
In the future.
The guy claims he doesn't know anything about it, is not a scientist
and to shove off.
After a moments thought the traveller disappears in a puff of light.
"Well I'll be a pie-eyed emu" the guy exclaims. "What a wierdo!"

--
[The UAH LT series:]
Previously reported discrepancies between the amount of warming near the 
surface and higher in the atmosphere have been used to challenge the 
reliability of climate models and the reality of human-induced global warming
... This significant discrepancy no longer exists because errors in the 
satellite and radiosonde data have been identified and corrected. New data 
sets have also been developed that do not show such discrepancies.
-- John Christy, Ben Santer et al, 2006

Back to sci.physics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Gravity Forces "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 11:32 -0700
  Re: Gravity Forces Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 13:53 -0500
    Re: Gravity Forces HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 06:26 -0400
  Re: Gravity Forces "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-05 12:48 -0700
  Re: Gravity Forces "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 16:47 -0700
    Re: Gravity Forces Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 19:01 -0500
      Re: Gravity Forces gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-05 19:35 -0500
        Re: Gravity Forces "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 18:10 -0700
          Re: Gravity Forces "hanson" <hanson@quick.net> - 2015-08-05 19:50 -0700
          Re: Gravity Forces gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-05 23:12 -0500
      Re: Gravity Forces Enomis Skating <anomis.edenomis@libero.it> - 2015-08-05 18:23 -0700
    Re: Gravity Forces Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 19:07 -0500
      Re: Gravity Forces "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 17:34 -0700
        Re: Gravity Forces Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 20:07 -0500
    Re: Gravity Forces HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-08-06 06:28 -0400
  Re: Gravity Forces Sam Wormley <swormley1@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 19:10 -0500
    Re: Gravity Forces "reber g=emc^2" <herbertglazier0@gmail.com> - 2015-08-05 17:37 -0700
      Re: Gravity Forces gilber34 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-08-05 23:20 -0500
    Re: Gravity Forces R Kym Horsell <kym@kymhorsell.com> - 2015-08-06 00:43 +0000

csiph-web