Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.c > #4276

Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc

Message-ID <mpbea8-0bk.ln1@wilbur.25thandClement.com> (permalink)
From William Ahern <william@wilbur.25thandClement.com>
Subject Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
References <ir0jt2$mol$1@news.albasani.net> <slrnit7reg.1ohi.usenet-nospam@guild.seebs.net> <lnmxij52zq.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org>
Date 2011-05-18 19:27 -0700

Show all headers | View raw


Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> wrote:
> Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> writes:
<snip>
> > __func__ is in the implementation's namespace.  There is no lack of
> > compliance with C89 if the implementation happens to define things in
> > its own reserved namespace...

> On the other hand, it would certainly be polite for gcc to warn about
> this, at least in some mode.  The standard imposes no obligation to do
> so, but gcc *knows* that __func__ specific to C99, and therefore that
> any code that uses it is not portable to non-gcc C90 implementations.

> Perhaps there's an option to do so; "-Wall" doesn't actually enable
> *all* warnings (but a search of the gcc documentation didn't find such
> an option).

> (By "gcc knows", of course, I mean that the authors know, and could make
> use of that knowedge to make gcc issue a warning.)

According to my local man page GCC won't warn about `__' prefixed
identifers, even in -pedantic mode. GCC supports prefixing of non-standard
features even when in strict or pedantic mode. For example, __restrict__ or
__typeof__(). I'm unsure if the suffix is required, but using a prefix and
suffix is conventional.

Failing to warn about __func__ might be an unintended consequence of the way
this extension feature is implemented.

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc rouben@shady.(none) (Rouben Rostamian) - 2011-05-18 14:08 +0000
  Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2011-05-18 10:13 -0400
  Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-05-18 16:03 +0000
    Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-18 10:32 -0700
      Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc cri@tiac.net (Richard Harter) - 2011-05-18 19:39 +0000
        Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-05-18 19:45 +0000
      Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc William Ahern <william@wilbur.25thandClement.com> - 2011-05-18 19:27 -0700
    Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-19 08:42 -0700
      Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-05-19 16:34 +0000
        Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2011-05-19 14:15 -0400
        Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2011-05-19 14:45 -0400
        Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2011-05-19 14:02 -0700
      Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2011-05-19 12:45 -0700
  Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Sorc Chan <sorcchan@gmail.com> - 2011-05-19 02:03 -0700
    Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-05-19 06:17 -0400
      Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2011-05-19 13:44 -0700
        Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-19 13:48 -0700
          Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2011-05-19 14:12 -0700
            Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-19 14:29 -0700
              Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2011-05-19 21:54 +0000
                Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Angel <angel+news@spamcop.net> - 2011-05-19 22:27 +0000
              Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2011-05-24 02:23 -0700
          Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2011-05-19 21:54 +0000
          Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-05-19 23:26 -0400
            Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2011-05-19 22:39 -0500
    Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2011-05-19 08:22 -0400
      Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2011-05-19 13:47 -0700

csiph-web