Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Message-ID | <mpbea8-0bk.ln1@wilbur.25thandClement.com> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| From | William Ahern <william@wilbur.25thandClement.com> |
| Subject | Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| References | <ir0jt2$mol$1@news.albasani.net> <slrnit7reg.1ohi.usenet-nospam@guild.seebs.net> <lnmxij52zq.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> |
| Date | 2011-05-18 19:27 -0700 |
Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> wrote: > Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> writes: <snip> > > __func__ is in the implementation's namespace. There is no lack of > > compliance with C89 if the implementation happens to define things in > > its own reserved namespace... > On the other hand, it would certainly be polite for gcc to warn about > this, at least in some mode. The standard imposes no obligation to do > so, but gcc *knows* that __func__ specific to C99, and therefore that > any code that uses it is not portable to non-gcc C90 implementations. > Perhaps there's an option to do so; "-Wall" doesn't actually enable > *all* warnings (but a search of the gcc documentation didn't find such > an option). > (By "gcc knows", of course, I mean that the authors know, and could make > use of that knowedge to make gcc issue a warning.) According to my local man page GCC won't warn about `__' prefixed identifers, even in -pedantic mode. GCC supports prefixing of non-standard features even when in strict or pedantic mode. For example, __restrict__ or __typeof__(). I'm unsure if the suffix is required, but using a prefix and suffix is conventional. Failing to warn about __func__ might be an unintended consequence of the way this extension feature is implemented.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc rouben@shady.(none) (Rouben Rostamian) - 2011-05-18 14:08 +0000
Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2011-05-18 10:13 -0400
Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-05-18 16:03 +0000
Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-18 10:32 -0700
Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc cri@tiac.net (Richard Harter) - 2011-05-18 19:39 +0000
Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-05-18 19:45 +0000
Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc William Ahern <william@wilbur.25thandClement.com> - 2011-05-18 19:27 -0700
Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-19 08:42 -0700
Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-05-19 16:34 +0000
Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2011-05-19 14:15 -0400
Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2011-05-19 14:45 -0400
Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2011-05-19 14:02 -0700
Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2011-05-19 12:45 -0700
Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Sorc Chan <sorcchan@gmail.com> - 2011-05-19 02:03 -0700
Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-05-19 06:17 -0400
Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2011-05-19 13:44 -0700
Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-19 13:48 -0700
Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2011-05-19 14:12 -0700
Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-19 14:29 -0700
Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2011-05-19 21:54 +0000
Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Angel <angel+news@spamcop.net> - 2011-05-19 22:27 +0000
Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2011-05-24 02:23 -0700
Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2011-05-19 21:54 +0000
Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-05-19 23:26 -0400
Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2011-05-19 22:39 -0500
Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2011-05-19 08:22 -0400
Re: The variable __func__ in C89 in gcc Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2011-05-19 13:47 -0700
csiph-web