Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #357579
| From | Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Einstein's mistake and Okun's delusion |
| Date | 2015-07-17 07:06 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <moar51$2de$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <jc5gqap2lqf027kg296sk4f88bj88bq9kr@4ax.com> <mo999v$im$2@speranza.aioe.org> <sebgqat4mvf1vrt59o4os0drnb8acgq6lm@4ax.com> <mo9bd7$4c4$3@speranza.aioe.org> <b5ggqadujnhitl6b3deidn2d2lfc6lhu56@4ax.com> |
On 7/16/2015 6:42 PM, kefischer wrote: > On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:32:06 -0500, Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On 7/16/2015 5:22 PM, kefischer wrote: >>> On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 16:56:17 -0500, Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 7/16/2015 4:00 PM, kefischer wrote: >>>>> Because you are stupid, you know no physics >>>>> at all, all you know is what you read in books. >>>> >>>> Physics books, yes. >>>> As opposed to all the physics you know from NOT reading physics books. >>>> Got it. >>> >>> Moron, the physics books are not gospel, >>> they are opinions of the authors. >> >> Uh-huh. You believe that science textbooks express opinions? > > Yes, stupid, that is exactly what I think > any book consists of. Aha. Good to know that's what you think. > > >> And so since you have an opinion too, then your physics is as good as >> anyone else's opinion... er... physics? > > I have good reason to believe it is > better than that of most people. > That would be your opinion, right? > >> And a book on arithmetic. Is that full of opinions too? > > Divert, divert, divert. "That is exactly what I think any book consists of." > > >> What about a book on plane geometry, full of this thing called "proofs"? >> Are those not proofs but just opinions? > > Divert, divert, divert. "That is exactly what I think any book consists of." > > >> And encyclopedias.... are they just multivolume compendia of opinions? > > Divert, divert, divert. "That is exactly what I think any book consists of." > > > >>> You should really be posting in a lady's >>> gossip group. > -- Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Einstein's mistake and Okun's delusion kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-07-16 17:00 -0400
Re: Einstein's mistake and Okun's delusion khrapko_ri@hotmail.com - 2015-07-17 01:07 -0700
Re: Einstein's mistake and Okun's delusion kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-07-17 04:52 -0700
Re: Einstein's mistake and Okun's delusion Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 07:26 -0500
Re: Einstein's mistake and Okun's delusion Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 07:06 -0500
Re: Einstein's mistake and Okun's delusion Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 07:11 -0500
csiph-web