Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #357579

Re: Einstein's mistake and Okun's delusion

From Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Einstein's mistake and Okun's delusion
Date 2015-07-17 07:06 -0500
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <moar51$2de$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (7 earlier) <jc5gqap2lqf027kg296sk4f88bj88bq9kr@4ax.com> <mo999v$im$2@speranza.aioe.org> <sebgqat4mvf1vrt59o4os0drnb8acgq6lm@4ax.com> <mo9bd7$4c4$3@speranza.aioe.org> <b5ggqadujnhitl6b3deidn2d2lfc6lhu56@4ax.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On 7/16/2015 6:42 PM, kefischer wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 17:32:06 -0500, Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On 7/16/2015 5:22 PM, kefischer wrote:
>>> On Thu, 16 Jul 2015 16:56:17 -0500, Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 7/16/2015 4:00 PM, kefischer wrote:
>>>>>             Because you are stupid, you know no physics
>>>>> at all, all you know is what you read in books.
>>>>
>>>> Physics books, yes.
>>>> As opposed to all the physics you know from NOT reading physics books.
>>>> Got it.
>>>
>>>            Moron, the physics books are not gospel,
>>> they are opinions of the authors.
>>
>> Uh-huh. You believe that science textbooks express opinions?
>
>           Yes, stupid, that is exactly what I think
> any book consists of.

Aha. Good to know that's what you think.

>
>
>> And so since you have an opinion too, then your physics is as good as
>> anyone else's opinion... er... physics?
>
>             I have good reason to believe it is
> better than that of  most people.
>

That would be your opinion, right?

>
>> And a book on arithmetic. Is that full of opinions too?
>
>              Divert, divert, divert.

"That is exactly what I think any book consists of."

>
>
>> What about a book on plane geometry, full of this thing called "proofs"?
>> Are those not proofs but just opinions?
>
>              Divert, divert, divert.

"That is exactly what I think any book consists of."

>
>
>> And encyclopedias.... are they just multivolume compendia of opinions?
>
>               Divert, divert, divert.

"That is exactly what I think any book consists of."

>
>
>
>>>             You should really be posting in a lady's
>>> gossip group.
>


-- 
Odd Bodkin --- maker of fine toys, tools, tables

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Einstein's mistake and Okun's delusion kefischer <emoneyjoe@iglou.com> - 2015-07-16 17:00 -0400
  Re: Einstein's mistake and Okun's delusion khrapko_ri@hotmail.com - 2015-07-17 01:07 -0700
  Re: Einstein's mistake and Okun's delusion kenseto <setoken@att.net> - 2015-07-17 04:52 -0700
    Re: Einstein's mistake and Okun's delusion Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 07:26 -0500
  Re: Einstein's mistake and Okun's delusion Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 07:06 -0500
  Re: Einstein's mistake and Okun's delusion Odd Bodkin <bodkinodd@gmail.com> - 2015-07-17 07:11 -0500

csiph-web