Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.astronomy > #270934
| From | Simoen <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.astronomy, sci.physics, sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Near True |
| Date | 2015-07-14 10:47 -0500 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <mo3au7$jm7$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <55A34275.701F@ix.netcom.com> <mo15cf$3sh$1@pcls7.std.com> <55A4415A.78A4@ix.netcom.com> <mo1tf4$b19$1@pcls7.std.com> <55A4A291.7D61@ix.netcom.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 7/14/2015 12:48 AM, The Starmaker wrote: > Michael Moroney wrote: >> >> The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> writes: >> >>> Michael Moroney wrote: >>>> >>>> How NASA uses the term: >>>> >>>> http://starchild.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/StarChild/questions/question20.html >>>> >>>> Also see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_color >> >>> Okay, yours user-edited website reads: >> >>> A false-color image is an image that depicts an object in colors that >>> differ from those a photograph (a "true-color" image) would show. >> >> That's all you need to know. >> >> Think of an old-time color photograph negative. That's a false color >> image, but one from which a true color image can be recreated. >> A black-and-white photograph is also false color. >> >> Sometimes false color is the only way to do it. Like a photo in the >> infrared or ultraviolet. You *must* use false color for that, what would >> a true-color infrared photograph look like? >> >> IR and UV can show details not visible in visible light. Ever see a photo >> of flowers in the ultraviolet, the way a bee would see it? Can't do it >> without false color. I have a false color aerial photograph of where I >> live from 20 years ago. It's in infrared and visible light. Infrared is >> shown as red. Healthy vegetation (farm fields, golf courses etc.) show up >> as bright red as healthy vegetation reflects IR very well. Not so healthy >> vegetation as dull red or pinkish. It shows the health in much more >> detail than just looking at it, as both look green. >> >>> I don't see any difference....it's still 'meant to deceive, incorrect, >>> not according with truth or fact.' >> >> How can it be meant to deceive if they explicitly say it's false color? >> Esp. when they explicitly give color mapping, like my USGS false color >> photograph? It says that infrared appears as red, red as green and green >> as blue, as well as giving the actual wavelengths. > > I think you got lost somewhere... > > The Subject heading of this threads reads? "Near True". > > then I posted NASA article: > > NASA publishes 1st 'near-true color' images of Pluto > http://rt.com/usa/268678-nasa-first-pluto-images/ > > > They didn't write false colors... if they are not TRUE COLORS, they are FALSE COLORS. Simple. > > somebody came into my thread and added "false colors" which was never mentioned in the news... "near-true" is "not true", which means it is "false". and "someone" had to correct your faulty thinking, which may be "near-true", but "not true", so "faulty thinking" it is. > > > "false colors" was not mentioned in the news... > > > What was mentioned was 'near-true color' and simulated true-colour ....but no mentioned of the words "false colors". > > > Tell your News Science People that I said to put in the Headline "false colors", instead of > 'near-true color' and "simulated true-colour", okay? absolutly, I will get right on it, but they will ask, How False? then what? > > > Because everybody knows what "false" means. false is near-true. > > > So the average person can say..."Oh, it's fuckin fake color photos!" > the color on your computer screen is false too.
Back to alt.astronomy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-06-21 13:11 -0700
Re: Near True Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-06-21 15:04 -0700
Re: Near True David Staup <dstaup@charter.net> - 2015-06-21 19:19 -0500
Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-05 19:01 -0700
Re: Near True Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-07-06 14:37 -0700
Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-07 20:22 -0700
Re: Near True Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-07-08 12:47 -0700
Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-08 14:26 -0700
Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-09 10:52 -0700
Re: Near True Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-07-09 15:03 -0700
Re: Near True palsing <pnalsing@gmail.com> - 2015-07-09 19:10 -0700
Re: Near True Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-07-10 06:36 -0700
Re: Near True Simoen <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-10 22:41 -0500
Re: Near True Arc Michael <abookoflife@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-13 13:36 -0700
Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-13 23:10 -0700
Re: Near True benj <nobody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 03:00 -0400
Re: Near True Simoen <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-14 11:34 -0500
Re: Near True Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-07-14 10:04 -0700
Re: Near True "Notroll2015" <notroll2015@charter.net> - 2015-07-14 12:17 -0500
Re: Near True Simoen <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-08 00:21 -0500
Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-10 19:41 -0700
Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-10 19:43 -0700
Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-12 21:45 -0700
Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-13 12:11 -0700
Re: Near True moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-07-13 20:00 +0000
Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-13 15:53 -0700
Re: Near True moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-07-14 02:51 +0000
Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-13 22:48 -0700
Re: Near True moroney@world.std.spaamtrap.com (Michael Moroney) - 2015-07-14 15:28 +0000
Re: Near True Simoen <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-14 10:47 -0500
Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-14 10:34 -0700
Re: Near True HVAC <Mr.HVAC@gmail.com> - 2015-07-16 07:14 -0400
Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-24 13:55 -0700
Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-26 20:52 -0700
Re: Near True The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-07-29 11:48 -0700
Near True2 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-01 23:54 -0700
Re: Near True2 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-02 00:57 -0700
Re: Near True2 Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 04:36 -0700
Re: Near True2 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-02 12:37 -0700
Re: Near True2 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-02 14:04 -0700
Re: Near True2 The Starmaker <starmaker@ix.netcom.com> - 2015-08-02 17:35 -0700
Re: Near True2 Saul Levy <saullevy1@cox.net> - 2015-08-02 04:39 -0700
Re: Near True Simoen <invalid@invalid.com> - 2015-07-10 22:37 -0500
csiph-web