Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD?

From	dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups	nl.politiek, nl.juridisch, nl.scouting, nl.gezondheid.psychiatrie, uk.legal
Subject	Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD?
Date	2025-11-16 10:18 +1100
Message-ID	<mnsg1mFqlb3U3@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	(4 earlier) <4bdhhk5gie2bmgrd8vh3r6sfn478pih2n4@ed.is.dead> <mnsab9Fq7vcU2@mid.individual.net> <iruhhk9r58t3r4u15udev3rpm88q7tpu2o@ed.is.dead> <mnsco5Fqlb3U1@mid.individual.net> <ec0ihktq3n9gfqmn239oeprri0nsnbmelf@ed.is.dead>

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

DOLF: "As they say DONKEY: The bigger the DICK, the bigger the DICK (ie. 
a stupid or contemptible man; anything at all) and a cult prostitute 
such as you surely knows that a fool and their money are soon parted.

YOUTUBE: "MICHAEL JACKSON - WHO IS IT (OFFICIAL VIDEO)"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PfrV_6yWbEg>

The Spanish Inquisition, established in 1478, was a powerful institution 
aimed at maintaining Catholic orthodoxy in Spain. It was not only a 
tribunal to enforce religious unity but also a formidable instrument of 
royal power. Its dual legacy continues to spark debate among historians, 
with some viewing it as a defender of faith, while others see it as a 
tool for silencing dissent and consolidating state control. The 
Inquisition's methods included harsh interrogation techniques and 
torture to extract confessions from suspected heretics, with a 
significant number of cases involving accusations of Judaism, Islam, or 
Lutheranism. The Inquisition's influence extended beyond Spain, 
affecting other Spanish territories and beyond, and it operated for over 
350 years before being abolished in 1834.

Isn't it about time for your SPANISH CATHOLIC FASCIST CIRCUS to move on?"

PANCHO SANZA @ 0943 HRS ON 15 NOVEMBER 2025 (GOT VERDOMME KOTS): "Take 
your fucking money and shove it up your arse
'Cause you think you understand, well it's a fucking farce
I'm tired of fucking phonies, that's right, I'm tired of you."

SEE ALSO: "(PART 1 OF 2) COPILOT DIALOGUE IN RELATION TO VOLUNTÄTIS 
(FREE WILL)"

<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/CoPilot%20Chat%20on%20Voluntatis%2020251021.pdf>

A revision of this document may be obtained from the following URL:

<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/CoPilot%20Chat%20on%20Voluntatis%2020251021%20Part%202.pdf>

Revision Date: 15 November 2025

On 11/16/25 09:43, Pancho Sanza wrote:
> Take your fucking money and shove it up your arse
> 'Cause you think you understand, well it's a fucking farce
> I'm tired of fucking phonies, that's right, I'm tired of you
> Alright, no, no, no, no, no, no, Mr. Suit

-- 
Check out our SAVVY module prototype that facilitates a movable / 
resizable DIALOG and complex dropdown MENU interface deploying the third 
party d3 library.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/?heuristic>

<http://www.grapple369.com/Savvy/Savvy.zip> (Download resources)

Thread

D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilgöz ’die feeks van de VVD’ Cees Camphuis <CeesCamphuis@ziggo.nl> - 2025-11-14 17:19 +0100
  Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilgöz ’die feeks van de VVD’ Omnibus <zozozo@fakeadressnomail.be> - 2025-11-14 19:20 +0100
    Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilgöz ’die feeks van de VVD’ pieterw <pieterw4809@live.nl> - 2025-11-15 08:39 +0100
      CDA rules supreme ! Jos Bergervoet <Jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2025-11-15 09:15 +0100
        Re: CDA rules supreme ! pieterw <pieterw4809@live.nl> - 2025-11-15 09:45 +0100
  Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg�z �die feeks van de VVD� Pancho Sanza <spansanza@gmail.com> - 2025-11-14 21:40 +0100
    Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg�z �die feeks van de VVD� Cees Camphuis <CeesCamphuis@ziggo.nl> - 2025-11-15 08:05 +0100
      Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? pieterw <pieterw4809@live.nl> - 2025-11-15 08:41 +0100
        Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? Cees Camphuis <CeesCamphuis@ziggo.nl> - 2025-11-15 08:25 +0000
          Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? pieterw <pieterw4809@live.nl> - 2025-11-15 09:47 +0100
            Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? Cees Camphuis <CeesCamphuis@ziggo.nl> - 2025-11-15 10:27 +0100
              Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? pieterw <pieterw4809@live.nl> - 2025-11-16 09:16 +0100
                Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? Barokino <barokino@upcmail.nl> - 2025-11-16 10:41 +0100
                Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? pieterw <pieterw4809@live.nl> - 2025-11-16 12:38 +0100
                Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? Number51 <x@x.xx> - 2025-11-16 14:26 +0100
                Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? Den Oude <Baron@Den-Oude.xx> - 2025-11-16 14:56 +0100
                Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? pieterw <pieterw4809@live.nl> - 2025-11-16 15:04 +0100
                Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? Den Oude <Baron@Den-Oude.xx> - 2025-11-16 15:22 +0100
                Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? pieterw <pieterw4809@live.nl> - 2025-11-16 14:57 +0100
                Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? Number51 <x@x.xx> - 2025-11-16 15:10 +0100
                Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? Den Oude <Baron@Den-Oude.xx> - 2025-11-16 15:17 +0100
                Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? pieterw <pieterw4809@live.nl> - 2025-11-16 16:41 +0100
                Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? Den Oude <Baron@Den-Oude.xx> - 2025-11-16 16:45 +0100
                Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? Cees Camphuis <CeesCamphuis@ziggo.nl> - 2025-11-16 10:52 +0100
          CDA rules supreme ! Jos Bergervoet <Jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2025-11-15 09:49 +0100
            Re: CDA rules supreme ! Jos Bergervoet <Jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2025-11-15 10:18 +0100
              Re: CDA rules supreme ! pieterw <pieterw4809@live.nl> - 2025-11-15 10:27 +0100
              Re: CDA rules supreme ! Cees Camphuis <CeesCamphuis@ziggo.nl> - 2025-11-15 10:33 +0100
                Re: CDA rules supreme ! Henk <IngridenHenk@yahoo.com> - 2025-11-15 11:25 +0100
                Re: CDA rules supreme ! Cees Camphuis <CeesCamphuis@ziggo.nl> - 2025-11-15 12:55 +0100
                Re: CDA rules supreme ! Henk <IngridenHenk@yahoo.com> - 2025-11-15 17:41 +0100
                Re: CDA rules supreme ! Cees Camphuis <CeesCamphuis@ziggo.nl> - 2025-11-15 18:52 +0100
                Re: CDA rules supreme ! Pancho Sanza <spansanza@gmail.com> - 2025-11-15 19:03 +0100
                Re: CDA rules supreme ! Henk <IngridenHenk@yahoo.com> - 2025-11-15 19:23 +0100
                Re: CDA rules supreme ! Cees Camphuis <CeesCamphuis@ziggo.nl> - 2025-11-15 19:28 +0100
                Re: CDA rules supreme ! paai <hari@seldon.un> - 2025-11-15 21:20 +0100
                Re: CDA rules supreme ! Barokino <barokino@upcmail.nl> - 2025-11-16 10:43 +0100
                Re: CDA rules supreme ! Henk <IngridenHenk@yahoo.com> - 2025-11-16 12:27 +0100
                Re: CDA rules supreme ! Cees Camphuis <CeesCamphuis@ziggo.nl> - 2025-11-16 17:21 +0100
                Re: CDA rules supreme ! Omnibus <zozozo@fakeadressnomail.be> - 2025-11-16 19:35 +0100
                Re: CDA rules supreme ! pieterw <pieterw4809@live.nl> - 2025-11-16 09:25 +0100
                Re: CDA rules supreme ! Cees Camphuis <CeesCamphuis@ziggo.nl> - 2025-11-16 11:12 +0100
                Re: CDA rules supreme ! Jos Bergervoet <Jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2025-11-15 14:57 +0100
        Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? Omnibus <zozozo@fakeadressnomail.be> - 2025-11-15 16:44 +0100
      Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? Pancho Sanza <spansanza@gmail.com> - 2025-11-15 14:23 +0100
      Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg�z �die feeks van de VVD� Omnibus <zozozo@fakeadressnomail.be> - 2025-11-15 16:43 +0100
        Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? Pancho Sanza <spansanza@gmail.com> - 2025-11-15 18:14 +0100
          Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? Omnibus <zozozo@fakeadressnomail.be> - 2025-11-15 22:40 +0100
            Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? Pancho Sanza <spansanza@gmail.com> - 2025-11-15 22:58 +0100
        Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? Pancho Sanza <spansanza@gmail.com> - 2025-11-15 18:18 +0100
          Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? Henk <IngridenHenk@yahoo.com> - 2025-11-15 19:29 +0100
            Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? Pancho Sanza <spansanza@gmail.com> - 2025-11-15 21:52 +0100
              Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? Henk <IngridenHenk@yahoo.com> - 2025-11-16 11:43 +0100
                Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? Pancho Sanza <spansanza@gmail.com> - 2025-11-16 14:33 +0100
                Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? Henk <IngridenHenk@yahoo.com> - 2025-11-16 17:36 +0100
                Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? Pancho Sanza <spansanza@gmail.com> - 2025-11-16 19:20 +0100
                Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? Den Oude <Baron@Den-Oude.xx> - 2025-11-16 19:29 +0100
          Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2025-11-16 08:31 +1100
          Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2025-11-16 08:40 +1100
            Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? Pancho Sanza <spansanza@gmail.com> - 2025-11-15 23:15 +0100
              Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2025-11-16 09:21 +1100
                Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? Pancho Sanza <spansanza@gmail.com> - 2025-11-15 23:43 +0100
                Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2025-11-16 10:15 +1100
                Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2025-11-16 10:18 +1100
                Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? Pancho Sanza <spansanza@gmail.com> - 2025-11-16 00:35 +0100
                Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2025-11-16 11:10 +1100
                Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2025-11-16 11:13 +1100
                Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? Pancho Sanza <spansanza@gmail.com> - 2025-11-16 01:29 +0100
                Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2025-11-16 12:01 +1100
                Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? Pancho Sanza <spansanza@gmail.com> - 2025-11-16 02:35 +0100
                Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2025-11-16 12:51 +1100
                Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? Pancho Sanza <spansanza@gmail.com> - 2025-11-16 03:11 +0100
                Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? Den Oude <Baron@Den-Oude.xx> - 2025-11-16 10:44 +0100
                Re: -- NO MORE OPPORTUNITY FOR REDEMPTION FOR THE DUTCH SOVEREIGN Pancho Sanza <spansanza@gmail.com> - 2025-11-16 14:41 +0100
                Re: -- NO MORE OPPORTUNITY FOR REDEMPTION FOR THE DUTCH SOVEREIGN dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2025-11-16 16:17 +0000
                Re: -- NO MORE OPPORTUNITY FOR REDEMPTION FOR THE DUTCH SOVEREIGN Pancho Sanza <spansanza@gmail.com> - 2025-11-16 19:25 +0100
                Re: -- NO MORE OPPORTUNITY FOR REDEMPTION FOR THE DUTCH SOVEREIGN dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2025-11-16 19:30 +0000
                Re: -- NO MORE OPPORTUNITY FOR REDEMPTION FOR THE DUTCH SOVEREIGN Pancho Sanza <spansanza@gmail.com> - 2025-11-16 21:44 +0100
                Re: -- NO MORE OPPORTUNITY FOR REDEMPTION FOR THE DUTCH SOVEREIGN dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2025-11-16 21:16 +0000
                Re: -- NO MORE OPPORTUNITY FOR REDEMPTION FOR THE DUTCH SOVEREIGN Pancho Sanza <spansanza@gmail.com> - 2025-11-16 23:18 +0100
                Re: -- NO MORE OPPORTUNITY FOR REDEMPTION FOR THE DUTCH SOVEREIGN dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2025-11-16 22:32 +0000
                Re: -- NO MORE OPPORTUNITY FOR REDEMPTION FOR THE DUTCH SOVEREIGN dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2025-11-17 10:57 +1100
                Re: -- NO MORE OPPORTUNITY FOR REDEMPTION FOR THE DUTCH SOVEREIGN dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2025-11-17 11:19 +1100
                Re: -- NO MORE OPPORTUNITY FOR REDEMPTION FOR THE DUTCH SOVEREIGN dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2025-11-17 13:35 +1100
                Re: -- NO MORE OPPORTUNITY FOR REDEMPTION FOR THE DUTCH SOVEREIGN dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2025-11-17 19:47 +1100
                Re: -- NO MORE OPPORTUNITY FOR REDEMPTION FOR THE DUTCH SOVEREIGN dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2025-11-17 20:00 +1100
                Re: -- NO MORE OPPORTUNITY FOR REDEMPTION FOR THE DUTCH SOVEREIGN Rin Stowleigh <swallowyourear@yahoo.com> - 2025-12-01 06:22 -0600
                Re: -- NO MORE OPPORTUNITY FOR REDEMPTION FOR THE DUTCH SOVEREIGN dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2025-12-02 15:02 +0000
                Re: -- NO MORE OPPORTUNITY FOR REDEMPTION FOR THE DUTCH SOVEREIGN dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2025-12-02 15:28 +0000
                Re: -- SWEDISH COOK (DIEU ET MON DROIT TECHNOLOGICAL SUPERSESSION: #87 - INALIENABLE RIGHT / #1751 - SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE) Miss Piggy <misspiggy@muppets.tv> - 2025-12-03 00:21 +0100
                Re: -- SWEDISH COOK (DIEU ET MON DROIT TECHNOLOGICAL SUPERSESSION: #87 - INALIENABLE RIGHT / #1751 - SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE) Lin Stowlay <swallowyourear@yahoo.com> - 2025-12-02 17:44 -0600
                Re: -- SWEDISH COOK (DIEU ET MON DROIT TECHNOLOGICAL SUPERSESSION: #87 - INALIENABLE RIGHT / #1751 - SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE) Lin Stowlay <swallowyourear@yahoo.com> - 2025-12-02 18:57 -0600
                Re: -- SWEDISH COOK (DIEU ET MON DROIT TECHNOLOGICAL SUPERSESSION: #87 - INALIENABLE RIGHT / #1751 - SOVEREIGN PREROGATIVE) Lin Stowlay <swallowyourear@yahoo.com> - 2025-12-03 03:17 -0600
                Re: -- NO MORE OPPORTUNITY FOR REDEMPTION FOR THE DUTCH SOVEREIGN Kees van den Doel <kwakende@kulketlekkel.nl> - 2025-11-16 09:39 -0800
                Re: -- NO MORE OPPORTUNITY FOR REDEMPTION FOR THE DUTCH SOVEREIGN Kees van den Doel <kwakende@kulketlekkel.nl> - 2025-11-16 09:35 -0800
                Re: -- NO MORE OPPORTUNITY FOR REDEMPTION FOR THE DUTCH SOVEREIGN dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2025-11-17 04:37 +1100
                Re: -- NO MORE OPPORTUNITY FOR REDEMPTION FOR THE DUTCH SOVEREIGN dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2025-11-17 07:00 +1100
                Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> - 2025-11-16 12:54 +1100
                Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? Rink <rink.haalditweg.hof@invalid.com> - 2025-11-16 16:24 +0100
                Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? Pancho Sanza <spansanza@gmail.com> - 2025-11-16 16:57 +0100
                Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? Rink <rink.haalditweg.hof@invalid.com> - 2025-12-09 11:24 +0100
          Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? Omnibus <zozozo@fakeadressnomail.be> - 2025-11-15 22:42 +0100
            Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?z ?die feeks van de VVD? Pancho Sanza <spansanza@gmail.com> - 2025-11-15 23:05 +0100
    Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg?die feeks van de VVD? pieterw <pieterw4809@live.nl> - 2025-11-15 08:36 +0100
    Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilg�z �die feeks van de VVD� Jos Bergervoet <Jos.bergervoet@xs4all.nl> - 2025-11-15 09:23 +0100
  Re: D66-informateur Wijers treedt toch terug, noemde Yesilgöz ’die feeks van de VVD’ Barokino <barokino@upcmail.nl> - 2025-11-15 11:42 +0100

csiph-web