Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #356699
| From | Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.physics.relativity |
| Subject | Re: Two stupid questions for relativistic morons |
| Date | 2015-07-11 11:35 +0200 |
| Organization | ATMAN - ATM S.A. |
| Message-ID | <mnqo20$rje$1@node2.news.atman.pl> (permalink) |
| References | (17 earlier) <d0a39sFm3raU1@mid.individual.net> <mnoqhg$2er$1@node2.news.atman.pl> <d0b9teF10gaU1@mid.individual.net> <mnqe4d$i94$1@node2.news.atman.pl> <d0c3pkF6kv0U1@mid.individual.net> |
Użytkownik "Sylvia Else" napisał w wiadomości grup dyskusyjnych:d0c3pkF6kv0U1@mid.individual.net... On 11/07/2015 4:46 PM, Maciej Woźniak wrote: > > > Użytkownik "Sylvia Else" napisał w wiadomości grup > dyskusyjnych:d0b9teF10gaU1@mid.individual.net... > > |It's not generally helpful to attach non-standard meanings to terms. > |Nevertheless, for the moment, let's go with your definition of a proper > |caesium clock, being one that operates with a frequency of 9192631770 Hz. > > It's not my definition. It's YOUR definition. > And - whole Your briliant relativity is hanging on it. |That's all you have to say in response? Isn't it enough? OK, so I have a supposition alternative to Yours. Let' s suppose, an observer from Earth don't want relativistic clocks, standards and procedures at all. Suppose, that though they look great in theory, though they are beautiful and symmetrical, and they wonderfully match Your imagined pictures, they are also completely useless. Suppose, that observer from Earth prefers interpretation, that Your "relativistic effects" are no kind of relativistic effects, but just a simple, classical clock error. And that's why he corrects these clocks. Can You imagine something like that?
Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Two stupid questions for relativistic morons Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-07-10 11:47 +1000
Re: Two stupid questions for relativistic morons Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-07-11 18:52 +1000
Re: Two stupid questions for relativistic morons Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-07-11 11:35 +0200
Re: Two stupid questions for relativistic morons Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-11 04:32 -0700
Re: Two stupid questions for relativistic morons Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-07-11 21:35 +1000
Re: Two stupid questions for relativistic morons Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-07-11 14:17 +0200
Re: Two stupid questions for relativistic morons paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2015-07-12 17:04 -0700
Re: Two stupid questions for relativistic morons Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-07-13 10:10 +1000
Re: Two stupid questions for relativistic morons JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 13:15 -0700
csiph-web