Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics.relativity > #356699

Re: Two stupid questions for relativistic morons

From Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl>
Newsgroups sci.physics.relativity
Subject Re: Two stupid questions for relativistic morons
Date 2015-07-11 11:35 +0200
Organization ATMAN - ATM S.A.
Message-ID <mnqo20$rje$1@node2.news.atman.pl> (permalink)
References (17 earlier) <d0a39sFm3raU1@mid.individual.net> <mnoqhg$2er$1@node2.news.atman.pl> <d0b9teF10gaU1@mid.individual.net> <mnqe4d$i94$1@node2.news.atman.pl> <d0c3pkF6kv0U1@mid.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw



Użytkownik "Sylvia Else"  napisał w wiadomości grup 
dyskusyjnych:d0c3pkF6kv0U1@mid.individual.net...

On 11/07/2015 4:46 PM, Maciej Woźniak wrote:
>
>
> Użytkownik "Sylvia Else"  napisał w wiadomości grup
> dyskusyjnych:d0b9teF10gaU1@mid.individual.net...
>
> |It's not generally helpful to attach non-standard meanings to terms.
> |Nevertheless, for the moment, let's go with your definition of a proper
> |caesium clock, being one that operates with a frequency of 9192631770 Hz.
>
> It's not my definition. It's YOUR definition.
> And - whole Your briliant relativity is hanging on it.

|That's all you have to say in response?

Isn't it enough?
OK, so I have a supposition alternative to Yours.
Let' s suppose, an observer from Earth don't want relativistic
clocks, standards and procedures at all. Suppose, that though
they look great in theory, though they are beautiful and
symmetrical, and they wonderfully match Your imagined
pictures,  they are also completely  useless.

Suppose, that observer from Earth prefers interpretation,
that Your "relativistic effects" are no kind of relativistic
effects, but just a simple, classical clock error. And that's
why he corrects these clocks.

Can You imagine something like that? 

Back to sci.physics.relativity | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Two stupid questions for relativistic morons Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-07-10 11:47 +1000
  Re: Two stupid questions for relativistic morons Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-07-11 18:52 +1000
    Re: Two stupid questions for relativistic morons Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-07-11 11:35 +0200
      Re: Two stupid questions for relativistic morons Gary Harnagel <hitlong@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-11 04:32 -0700
      Re: Two stupid questions for relativistic morons Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-07-11 21:35 +1000
        Re: Two stupid questions for relativistic morons Maciej Woźniak <mlwozniak@wp.pl> - 2015-07-11 14:17 +0200
          Re: Two stupid questions for relativistic morons paparios <paparios@gmail.com> - 2015-07-12 17:04 -0700
          Re: Two stupid questions for relativistic morons Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2015-07-13 10:10 +1000
          Re: Two stupid questions for relativistic morons JanPB <filmart@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 13:15 -0700

csiph-web