Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: thread-safe random numbers... |
| Date | 2015-07-10 18:58 -0700 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <mnpt90$7ea$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <mk61l9$ap4$1@speranza.aioe.org><5b63a727-afb4-42c2-93d6-844989aa7e58@googlegroups.com><mnpbbs$67h$1@speranza.aioe.org><1970f801-752a-415f-935e-0a12e39eaff5@googlegroups.com><mnpd54$a7m$1@speranza.aioe.org> <lnd1zzr1re.fsf@kst-u.example.com> |
> "Keith Thompson" wrote in message > news:lnd1zzr1re.fsf@kst-u.example.com... > > "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> writes: [...] > > You read my mind wrt trying to use different PRNG algorithms > > in each thread. There could be a "pool of algorithms" that > > threads choose from. After they make the choice they seed the > > selected PRNG and use it. Just a very simple idea. > > > > All of this functionality wrt choosing an algorithm and seeding > > it can be accomplished during the "constructor" of a thread's > > specific storage. tss_t in C11. [...] > Why would you want to use a different *algorithm* in each thread? Or > did you mean to say you'd use the same algorithm with a different seed > (and internal state) in each thread? To observe what happens if you have a group of threads caculating an iterated function system with different PRNG's. Each thread would be a different color, then I think it might be interesting to take a look at the renderings. BTW, I am doing this for fun. :^)
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
thread-safe random numbers... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-05-27 20:22 -0700
Re: thread-safe random numbers... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-05-28 11:11 -0700
Re: thread-safe random numbers... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-05-28 11:19 -0700
Re: thread-safe random numbers... Rosario19 <Ros@invalid.invalid> - 2015-05-29 07:28 +0200
Re: thread-safe random numbers... James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-05-28 14:22 -0400
Re: thread-safe random numbers... Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-05-28 12:38 -0700
Re: thread-safe random numbers... James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-05-28 16:42 -0400
Re: thread-safe random numbers... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-05-28 13:57 -0700
Re: thread-safe random numbers... Nobody <nobody@nowhere.invalid> - 2015-05-29 22:42 +0100
Re: thread-safe random numbers... Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-07-10 11:56 -0700
Re: thread-safe random numbers... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-07-10 14:03 -0700
Re: thread-safe random numbers... Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-07-11 13:44 -0700
Re: thread-safe random numbers... "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-07-10 12:01 -0700
Re: thread-safe random numbers... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-07-10 13:53 -0700
Re: thread-safe random numbers... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-07-10 13:58 -0700
Re: thread-safe random numbers... "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2015-07-10 14:04 -0700
Re: thread-safe random numbers... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-07-10 14:23 -0700
Re: thread-safe random numbers... Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-07-10 17:12 -0700
Re: thread-safe random numbers... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-07-10 18:58 -0700
Re: thread-safe random numbers... Rosario19 <Ros@invalid.invalid> - 2015-07-11 11:13 +0200
csiph-web