Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c, sci.crypt |
| Subject | Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... |
| Date | 2015-07-10 15:09 -0700 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <mnpfs1$g4m$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | <mnhpm5$fh9$1@speranza.aioe.org> <mnp683$pld$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
> > "Chris M. Thomasson" wrote in message > > news:mnp683$pld$1@speranza.aioe.org... > > "Chris M. Thomasson" wrote in message > > news:mnhpm5$fh9$1@speranza.aioe.org... [...] > I am VERY interested in any cyrpto analysis that can crack the > formula/key responsible for encrypting several messages with > the same public key/derived-fractal. Keep in mind that the derived > fractal, or public key should be mathematically tied to the original > private fractal. Yikes! I made a typo in there. The public key is generated from the cleartext and is tied to the ciphertext via the private key and can be sent across the wire as is. So, I would like to see the private key cracked out of a series of ciphertexts and their associated public keys. For instance, here are mutations to the phrase "Hello World" encrypted with the program as-is. Keep in mind that you know the private key, and the public keys. So, how you one go about cracking another key that happens to works for all of the following cipher texts: public key = 0.068879 original = Hello World encrypted = d*GCXsUFHG` decrypted = Hello World public key = 0.235041 original = hello World encrypted = FF!]y@prMak decrypted = hello World public key = 0.224501 original = Hello Wordl encrypted = F2MNVaqXhve decrypted = Hello Wordl public key = 0.059056 original = Hello World Hello encrypted = 1zCCZlG?'%e7pAfk7 decrypted = Hello World Hello public key = 0.107481 original = Hello World hello encrypted = %')Ln2,(Pf>IA sq5 decrypted = Hello World hello Is there an obvious pattern I totally missing! ;^/
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-07-07 17:08 -0700
Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-08 01:12 +0100
Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-07-07 17:19 -0700
Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-07 22:29 -0500
Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-07-07 22:43 -0700
Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-07-08 03:23 -0500
Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-07-08 07:36 -0400
Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-08 12:52 +0100
Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-07-08 11:10 -0700
Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-07-08 14:46 -0400
Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-07-08 12:10 -0700
Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-08 20:41 +0100
Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-07-09 09:55 -0700
Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-07-09 11:18 -0700
Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-09 19:25 +0100
Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-07-09 13:49 -0700
Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-09 22:09 +0100
Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-07-08 00:49 -0700
Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-07-07 23:05 -0700
Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-07-07 23:15 -0700
Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-07-10 12:25 -0700
Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-07-10 15:09 -0700
Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-07-15 15:52 +0100
Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-07-31 13:40 -0700
Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-07-31 13:43 -0700
Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-07-31 13:46 -0700
Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-08-21 14:45 -0700
Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-08-22 01:29 +0100
Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-08-21 20:03 -0700
Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-08-22 13:02 +0100
Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-08-22 18:15 -0700
Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-08-16 12:10 -0700
Re: Fun/Funny Fractal Encryption... luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2015-08-22 22:49 -0700
csiph-web