Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.os.development > #8326
| From | "Benjamin David Lunt" <zfysz@fysnet.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.os.development |
| Subject | 64-bit detection |
| Date | 2015-07-09 16:47 -0700 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <mnn174$dd$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
Hi guys, Sorry I have been away for a little while. I have been trying to follow some of the threads here, but haven't had much time to read them all. However, I had a thought a few days ago. Will my 32-bit OS run on a 64-bit machine? Well, after a few tweaks and fixes, yes it does. As far as I can tell, it runs as if it was a 32-bit machine. I haven't looked into 64-bit machines too much, nor at the moment have any interest in doing so. However, I am interested in simply detecting the 64-bit machine and displaying a message stating so. I thought I would dig out the .pdf's for the 64-bit and see if there is a flag in the eflags register (while in 32-bit (non-long) mode) that might (inadvertently) indicate this. I haven't yet, but thought I would look into this and was interested in your opinions. Have you done anything for 64-bit? Will you? And if so, how do you detect if 64-bit is available? Anyway, just stopped by for a few thoughts. Thanks, Ben -- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Forever Young Software http://www.fysnet.net/index.htm http://www.fysnet.net/osdesign_book_series.htm To reply by email, please remove the zzzzzz's Batteries not included, some Assembly required.
Back to alt.os.development | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
64-bit detection "Benjamin David Lunt" <zfysz@fysnet.net> - 2015-07-09 16:47 -0700
Re: 64-bit detection "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-07-09 23:41 -0400
Re: 64-bit detection "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-07-10 08:30 +0100
Re: 64-bit detection "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-07-10 05:17 -0400
Re: 64-bit detection "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-07-10 13:41 +0100
Re: 64-bit detection "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-07-12 19:04 +0100
Re: 64-bit detection "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-07-13 02:30 -0400
Re: 64-bit detection "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrunews@gmail.com> - 2015-07-13 02:07 -0700
Re: 64-bit detection "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-07-13 23:10 -0400
Re: 64-bit detection "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrunews@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 01:23 -0700
Re: 64-bit detection "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-07-13 12:34 +0100
Re: 64-bit detection "Rod Pemberton" <boo@fasdfrewar.cdm> - 2015-07-13 22:50 -0400
Re: 64-bit detection "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 08:37 +0100
Re: 64-bit detection "Alexei A. Frounze" <alexfrunews@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 01:41 -0700
Re: 64-bit detection "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-07-14 10:04 +0100
Re: 64-bit detection "Benjamin David Lunt" <zfysz@fysnet.net> - 2015-07-10 08:44 -0700
Re: 64-bit detection "Benjamin David Lunt" <zfysz@fysnet.net> - 2015-07-10 10:52 -0700
Re: 64-bit detection "Benjamin David Lunt" <zfysz@fysnet.net> - 2015-07-10 08:38 -0700
Re: 64-bit detection "Benjamin David Lunt" <zfysz@fysnet.net> - 2015-07-10 10:58 -0700
Re: 64-bit detection CN <qmbmnp3799@pacbell.net> - 2015-07-09 23:00 -0700
Re: 64-bit detection "Benjamin David Lunt" <zfysz@fysnet.net> - 2015-07-10 08:40 -0700
Re: 64-bit detection "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2015-07-10 21:29 +0100
csiph-web