Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c++.moderated > #7299
| Message-ID | <mlpvv5$i91$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c++.moderated, comp.lang.c++ |
| From | David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> |
| Subject | Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| References | (5 earlier) <mlna37$md5$1@dont-email.me> <y6OdnUG8htn2rOLInZ2dnUU7-KOdnZ2d@giganews.com> <mlnier$ucg$1@dont-email.me> <mlomg5$9ps$1@dont-email.me> <55805C1D.4020302@verizon.net> |
| Date | 2015-06-16 16:47 -0600 |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 16/06/15 22:59, James Kuyper wrote:
>
> On 06/16/2015 09:05 AM, David Brown wrote:
> ...
>>> I'm not impressed by MISRA's guidelines in general, and this one fits
>>> into that pattern. I've only heard of them second-hand; a copy of those
>>> guidelines is too expensive to justify buying one if you don't have an
>>> obligation to follow those guidelines. However, what I've heard from
>>> other people about those guidelines has not impressed me (and most of
>>> those people were MISRA supporters).
>>>
>>
>> MISRA standards are only £10 or £15 for the pdfs - it's not /that/
>> expensive! (But of course any cost makes the whole process a lot more
>> inconvenient, especially if you just want a quick look for curiosity.)
>
> IIRC, the last time I looked it was several hundred US$. A year ago, I
> would have thought that £10 it would be almost worth paying for, just
> out of curiosity. However, since the twins arrived I'm paying closer
> attention to my money.
>
That must have been a /long/ time ago - or perhaps you are mixing it
with some other standards (such as the current C++ standard, which is an
absurd $265).
If you have anything specific you want to ask about MISRA, let me know
and I can look it up - I can't send you a copy (since it would be
copyright infringement, and the pdf is watermarked with my name).
--
[ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]
[ comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: Do this! ]
Back to comp.lang.c++.moderated | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Avoid 'int' and associates. Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2015-06-14 06:36 -0600
Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-06-14 18:00 -0600
Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. Francis Glassborow <francis.glassborow@btinternet.com> - 2015-06-14 18:07 -0600
Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. "James K. Lowden" <jklowden@speakeasy.net> - 2015-06-14 18:11 -0600
Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-06-14 18:11 -0600
Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homepage@googlemail.com> - 2015-06-14 18:11 -0600
Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2015-06-14 20:24 -0600
Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-06-15 07:13 -0600
Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. Francis Glassborow <francis.glassborow@btinternet.com> - 2015-06-15 11:22 -0600
Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2015-06-15 13:02 -0600
Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. Francis Glassborow <francis.glassborow@btinternet.com> - 2015-06-15 14:54 -0600
Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2015-06-15 15:54 -0600
Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-06-15 21:04 -0600
Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-06-16 07:05 -0600
Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-06-16 14:59 -0600
Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-06-16 16:47 -0600
Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2015-06-16 09:54 -0600
Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. legalize+jeeves@mail.xmission.com (Richard) - 2015-06-16 14:59 -0600
Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2015-06-16 16:47 -0600
Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. "Chris M. Thomasson" <nospam@nospam.nospam> - 2015-06-16 15:03 -0600
Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. Mr Flibble <flibbleREMOVETHISBIT@i42.co.uk> - 2015-06-16 16:47 -0600
Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. pip010 <pip010@googlemail.com> - 2015-08-03 06:54 -0600
Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. maddoxr@acm.org - 2015-08-03 10:01 -0600
Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-06-15 21:04 -0600
Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-06-15 15:55 -0600
Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-06-16 07:04 -0600
Re: Avoid 'int' and associates. Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2015-06-27 14:17 -0600
csiph-web