Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #38708
| From | The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.raspberry-pi, comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Cross Platform Development |
| Date | 2015-04-29 05:23 +0100 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <mhpmcd$9rr$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | (13 earlier) <mhh347$ifi$1@dont-email.me> <mhiouk$r6u$1@dont-email.me> <mhjf5l$kul$1@dont-email.me> <3qadnXtCmfZhbKDInZ2dnUU7-KudnZ2d@supernews.com> <mhp0kq$vlt$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 28/04/15 23:12, Steve Graham wrote: > Elizabeth D. Rather wrote: > ... > >> >>> There were a number of odd/specialised languages around at the time >>> which >>> are not much used now and many of them had similar development >>> characteristics and the ability to run on small, slow machines. >>> >>> MUMPS, anybody? >> >> MUMPS was unbelievably slow, even on fairly fast machines. Interactivity >> was its own advantage. >> > > MUMPS is a lot like Forth in one aspect: Both were able to create > multi-user systems out of low-powered CPU's (Z80 for Forth (?) and 80286 > for MUMPS). And when 386's and 486's appeared on the scene, these > physically small machines took over the duties formerly relegated to > much larger mini-computers. As has been said of Forth in another > thread, MUMPS was able to eek out a lot more performance from the same > system than other languages could. > > Steve > Your version of history is interesting, but appears to be unique. MUMPS was a minicomputer language developed in the 60s. Specifically for medical use. Looking at the wiki entry reveals its more akin to a super COBOL than anything else. -- Everything you read in newspapers is absolutely true, except for the rare story of which you happen to have first-hand knowledge. – Erwin Knoll
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Cross Platform Development rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 09:25 -0400
Re: Cross Platform Development Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-04-26 19:43 +0000
Re: Cross Platform Development rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-04-26 21:30 -0400
Re: Cross Platform Development Steve Graham <jsgrahamus@yahoo.com> - 2015-04-28 15:16 -0700
Re: Cross Platform Development hughaguilar96@gmail.com - 2015-04-26 19:46 -0700
Re: Cross Platform Development "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2015-04-26 22:23 -1000
Re: Cross Platform Development Steve Graham <jsgrahamus@yahoo.com> - 2015-04-28 15:12 -0700
Re: Cross Platform Development The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-04-29 05:23 +0100
Re: Cross Platform Development rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-04-29 13:34 -0400
Re: Cross Platform Development Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-04-29 19:31 +0000
Re: Cross Platform Development rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-04-29 15:43 -0400
Re: Cross Platform Development Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-04-29 20:07 +0000
Re: Cross Platform Development rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-04-29 18:49 -0400
Re: Cross Platform Development Mike Fleming <{mike}@tauzero.co.uk> - 2015-05-01 18:23 +0100
Re: Cross Platform Development Michael J. Mahon <mjmahon@aol.com> - 2015-05-02 02:35 -0500
Re: Cross Platform Development Gordon Henderson <gordon+usenet@drogon.net> - 2015-05-02 10:08 +0000
Re: Cross Platform Development The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2015-04-27 09:31 +0100
csiph-web