Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Syntax error? |
| Date | 2015-04-26 19:55 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <mhjca2$amb$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <mhg0mq$f25$1@dont-email.me> <kfnmw1vouoe.fsf@x-alumni2.alumni.caltech.edu> |
On 26/04/2015 15:01, Tim Rentsch wrote: > Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> writes: > >> How fast can you spot the problem in this code: >> >> *(int (*))((char*)sptr+8)=(*(int (*))((char*)x+8)/*(int (*))((char*)y+8)); >> >> It was somewhat harder for me as the >> compiler says nothing about it until the >> next function dozens of lines later and >> then it picks on something totally >> unrelated. > > This code is program-generated, yes? You might > want to run the output through a formatter before > compiling it - that would make problems like this > much easier to diagnose. > The code generator already has to function as a formatter of sorts, and I make sure it's indented correctly and braces are used consistently. However the viewer I use doesn't highlight /*...*/ comments unless they start a line, otherwise it might have been more obvious. (Although I'm already inured to C code being highlighted as a comment half-way across a line because it thinks C's ! or != operator "!" starts a comment.) But what I was more astonished at was this glaring hole in the language where "/*" starts a comment even though it can also form part of a legal expression. I was aware of a similar problem with // comments but not /*...*/ ones. It's obvious now of course. (Maybe I should added a few more parentheses...) -- Bartc
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Syntax error? Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-04-25 13:19 +0100
Re: Syntax error? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-04-25 11:07 -0400
Re: Syntax error? jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2015-04-25 18:03 +0200
Re: Syntax error? Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-04-25 17:26 +0100
Re: Syntax error? jacobnavia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2015-04-25 19:28 +0200
Re: Syntax error? Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2015-04-26 11:19 +0200
Re: Syntax error? Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-04-26 11:17 +0100
Re: Syntax error? Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-04-26 11:36 +0100
Re: Syntax error? Ben Bacarisse <ben.lists@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-04-26 13:40 +0100
Re: Syntax error? Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-04-26 19:27 +0100
Re: Syntax error? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-04-26 12:38 -0700
Re: Syntax error? Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-04-26 22:26 +0100
Re: Syntax error? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-04-26 12:41 -0700
Re: Syntax error? Ben Bacarisse <ben.lists@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-04-27 01:53 +0100
Re: Syntax error? Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-04-26 13:24 +0100
Re: Syntax error? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-04-26 07:01 -0700
Re: Syntax error? Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-04-26 19:55 +0100
Re: Syntax error? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-04-27 02:39 -0500
Re: Syntax error? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-04-28 08:34 -0700
csiph-web