Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #288690

Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer

From Desk Rabbit <me@example.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer
Date 2015-04-09 16:57 +0100
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <mg67f5$go7$1@deskrabbit.motzarella.org> (permalink)
References (17 earlier) <mg4akj$iq3$1@dont-email.me> <ejogvb-mkb.ln1@user-1842.linux.individual.net> <mg5e36$gj1$2@deskrabbit.motzarella.org> <mg5lbr$a7k$2@dont-email.me> <0t4ivb-6ei.ln1@user-1842.linux.individual.net>

Show all headers | View raw

On 09/04/2015 12:37, William Poaster wrote:
> It was reported that Peter Köhlmann posted:
>
>> Desk Rabbit wrote:
>>
>>> On 09/04/2015 00:01, William Poaster wrote:
>>>> It was reported that Peter Köhlmann posted:
>>>>
>>>>> GreyCloud wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> GreyCloud wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Slimer wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On 2015-04-07 4:12 PM, vallor wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On 04/07/2015 04:35 AM, Desk Rabbit wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On 03/04/2015 01:46, GreyCloud wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GreyCloud wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ronb wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 02 Apr 2015 00:26:59 +0200, Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How about the update which recently put Windows machines
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> into a perpetual reboot? MS had to retract several updates
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the last months
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> because of major problems
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Microsoft knows they have trouble with updates. That's why
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> they have "Restore Points." Unfortunately these so-called
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "restore points" hardly
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> every work. I think one time one actually worked for me. What
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it usually
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comes down to is, try to fix it with a Windows tool, reboot,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> try again,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reboot, try again, reboot ... reboot, reboot again ...
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reinstall from scratch.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Uh... yes the restore point really works.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I had to use it to get rid of IE 11.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Worked perfectly.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also used restore point after trying out VS2013.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Worked perfectly.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Updated OpenSuse 13.2 a while back and it hosed the system due
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to a bug.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Restore point for that one?  Doesn't have one.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Idiot. Naturally "restore points" exist in linux. But since you
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> are a demented fool you are unable to find it when it isn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> called "restore point"
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How come that you are so incredible incompetent?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Says the guy that has yet to prove anything.  Guffaw!!!
>>>>>>>>>>>>> More like a lie from you.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> More typical Peter nonsense. He claims that restore points exist
>>>>>>>>>>>> but are called something else but strangely cannot name it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> A quick look at the OpenSuse forums show he is once again talking
>>>>>>>>>>>> complete nonsense.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://forums.opensuse.org/showthread.php/486108-Restore-points->
>>>>>>>>>>>> Rescue-Recovery-Repair-etc
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Quote "In general using openSUSE and EXT4 partitions, your only
>>>>>>>>>>>> options are to use a standard backup utility"
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> So in truth OpenSuse does not have restore points in the same way
>>>>>>>>>>>> Windows does out of the box.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>     ...because Internet forums are always accurate.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://i.imgur.com/bEZNSXb.jpg
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> He said "out of the box." Whether you tap dance or not, the
>>>>>>>>>> standard Linux installation doesn't offer LVM snapshots.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The "standard linux installation" will not offer LVM.
>>>>>>>>> That is a user choice.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> In short: You are trying to muddy the waters again by changing the
>>>>>>>>> topic / goalposts to "LVM snapshots"
>>>>>>>>> The topic is "snapshots". And they are provided out of the box
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And where does the installation program offer this snapshot??
>>>>>>>> It doesn't, so stop your lying.
>>>>>>>> Typical Koldturd.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> And you actually claim to have used Suse linux? Really? Why are yu
>>>>>>> unable to read what "Yast" writes? Are you really *that* stuupid? I
>>>>>>> thought that you are stupid like dirt. But that was too high praise
>>>>>>> for you
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The only one stupid here is you, you liar.
>>>>>> You provide no steps or proofs, so ergo you must be a liar.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Eh?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Guffaw!!!!
>>>>>
>>>>> Ye gods! It is even worse.
>>>>> You claim to have run Suse linux. *if* that were true, you could easily
>>>>> see if I tell the truth or not. Instead you want "steps". Which you
>>>>> could do yourself if you weren't so incredibly stupid. And if I provided
>>>>> the howto step by step, you would still be way too stupid to follow any
>>>>> of those.
>>>>
>>>> It's typical of a Windows user "Hold my hand, I can't find how to do it
>>>> by myself.."
>>>
>>> Correct analogy.
>
> I've corrected DumbRabbit's quote.
>
>>> All we were asking for is that thing that is as abhorrent to you
>>> Linux loonies as soap and water - facts and proof.
>
> Translation: We can google for GNU/LInux faults etc, but cannot find
> anything about BtrFS & how it works.
> These dimwit's couldn't find their way out of a paper bag! LOL
>
> FFS, I found a list of BtrFS features (which *includes* snapshots) without
> any bother. Why can't they?
> J.H.C. these wintrolls are *thicker* than mud.
>
>> Even when told how it is called, where to find it you still are unable to
>> check for yourself that your claims are pure, unadultered bullshit?
>
> And still the DumbRabbit troll replies to me, even though I've had the
> moron binned for ages. Shows you how stupid *he* is.
>

Yet somehow you are seeing my responses and caring enough to comment on 
them ;-)


So as I know you will read this, lets just refresh you faulty memory:

Peter claimed that restore points existed in LINUX.

He couldn't or wouldn't say how or where, he preferred to just call 
everyone an idiot instead of just simply stating the fact of the matter.

Later he came back to say that this feature existed in ONE distro 
(OpenSuse) by virtue of the fact that it now used btrfs.  Up until 
November 2014 OpenSuse used the same file system that pretty much every 
other distro uses which does not have snapshot features that btrfs.

I've already said I wasn't aware of this new development in a distro I 
don't use but Peter says he uses on a daily basis, so why couldn't he 
just mention this feature in his favourite OS instead of being an arse? 
One has to conclude that either he enjoys being a loud mouth or he 
wasn't aware of the function himself until he Googled it.

So far only ONE distro appears to have out of the box Restore Points 
which Windows has had for 15 years.

No other distro has btrfs as default so to claim that Linux in the 
context where we are comparing it to Windows Desktop has Restore Points 
is patently wrong.

Peter further compounded the situation by claiming that btrfs was 
standard on the big/major Linux server operating systems. So far he has 
yet to provide one example to back this claim.


Lastly, there are issues with this system that cause it to eat up disk 
space, something I've never seen Windows Restore Points do.

http://www.nrtm.org/index.php/2012/03/13/the-joys-of-btrfs-and-opensuse-or-no-space-left-on-device/comment-page-1/

Yup I know it's dated 2012, just read the comments. It's a problem that 
was there in 2012 and it's still catching people out in 2015.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

The Vista Upgrade Layer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-31 06:14 -0400
  Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 08:39 -0400
    Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 14:47 +0200
      Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 08:56 -0400
        Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-03-31 17:02 +0200
          Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 13:02 -0400
          Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-31 13:30 -0400
            Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 13:37 -0400
              Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 16:19 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 21:27 -0400
            Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 14:14 -0400
            Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 16:18 -0600
            Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-10 10:07 -0400
          At least the Ezekreep likes this shameless, documented liar chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-31 13:02 -0500
            Re: At least the Ezekreep likes this shameless, documented liar DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 14:29 -0400
              Re: At least the Ezekreep likes this shameless, documented liar GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 16:18 -0600
      Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 11:34 -0600
    Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Marti van Lin <ml2mst@nospam.indvalid> - 2015-03-31 18:27 +0200
      Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-31 12:33 -0400
        Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Marti van Lin <ml2mst@nospam.indvalid> - 2015-03-31 19:10 +0200
          Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-31 12:50 -0500
            Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-31 20:07 +0000
            Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 16:12 -0400
              Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 16:16 -0600
            Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Marti van Lin <ml2mst@nospam.indvalid> - 2015-04-01 02:33 +0200
              Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 11:59 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-02 00:57 -0700
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-02 06:51 -0500
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-02 07:55 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-02 12:12 -0500
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-02 14:08 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 08:26 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-02 14:53 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-02 09:05 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 09:44 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-02 16:18 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 10:40 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:21 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-02 14:04 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-02 13:38 -0500
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 21:24 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:19 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 21:19 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-03 10:30 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-03 13:46 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-03 18:25 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-04 11:51 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:18 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-02 13:23 -0500
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-02 19:51 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-03 07:05 -0500
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-03 13:06 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 11:56 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 20:08 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-04 16:20 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-05 01:02 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-05 00:50 +0000
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-05 12:29 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-05 11:34 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-05 12:28 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-05 22:44 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-05 15:27 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-05 23:36 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-06 13:07 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-06 07:30 -0500
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-06 10:39 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 09:15 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-02 13:20 -0500
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-02 19:54 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 22:00 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 21:21 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:17 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 01:05 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-02 19:57 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 18:53 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-02 09:58 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 10:31 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-02 12:59 -0700
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 20:54 +0000
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:12 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 08:23 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:11 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 13:08 +0000
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:10 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-02 13:16 -0500
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-02 13:09 -0700
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 20:49 +0000
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-02 15:46 -0500
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 21:22 +0000
                Just get Mint, Okay? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-02 15:59 -0700
                Re: Just get Mint, Okay? ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 23:32 +0000
                Re: Just get Mint, Okay? GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 18:52 -0600
                Re: Just get Mint, Okay? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-03 12:35 +0000
                Re: Just get Mint, Okay? ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-04 00:38 +0000
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:09 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:06 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:04 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-02 16:02 -0700
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 18:51 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-02 08:58 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 09:21 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-02 16:16 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-02 09:32 -0500
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 10:41 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:02 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 10:38 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 16:01 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 15:59 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 15:56 -0600
          Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 21:02 -0400
            Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-02 03:17 +0000
              Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-03 09:42 -0400
      Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 13:34 -0400
        Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Marti van Lin <ml2mst@nospam.indvalid> - 2015-04-01 02:39 +0200
          Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 21:39 -0400
            Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-01 09:18 +0200
              Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 09:27 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-01 17:00 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 11:13 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 11:56 -0600
              Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 14:06 +0000
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 11:07 -0400
              Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 11:56 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-01 20:00 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 14:27 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 16:17 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 21:13 +0000
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 16:16 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 16:16 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-02 00:26 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 23:00 +0000
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-01 20:08 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-02 01:10 -0700
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-02 13:53 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-02 15:15 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 15:53 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-07 12:29 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 10:23 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 15:50 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2015-04-02 05:06 -0700
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 15:44 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 15:44 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 00:07 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-02 23:27 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 01:02 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 18:47 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-02 23:36 +0000
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-03 09:33 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 11:54 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 18:46 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-07 12:36 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 10:18 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 18:46 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-07 12:35 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 10:17 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-07 13:12 -0700
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-07 17:22 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-07 23:55 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-07 18:11 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-07 18:30 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 19:04 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-08 00:42 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 19:04 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-08 09:54 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-08 11:08 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-08 12:08 -0700
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-08 15:12 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-08 17:39 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-08 22:38 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-09 12:35 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-09 12:30 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-09 12:26 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-08 15:08 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 19:02 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-08 10:19 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-07 18:12 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 19:01 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-08 10:25 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-08 14:59 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-09 00:40 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-09 12:25 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-07 23:43 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-08 00:52 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-07 19:16 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 18:58 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-08 10:23 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-08 12:58 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-08 13:25 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-08 10:55 -0700
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-08 14:52 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-08 14:51 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 18:57 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-07 22:54 +0000
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-08 10:21 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 18:54 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 18:53 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-08 10:15 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-08 18:07 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-08 14:49 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-09 00:39 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-08 22:48 +0000
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-08 16:47 -0700
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-08 23:57 +0000
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-08 17:11 -0700
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-09 12:24 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-09 00:01 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-09 09:44 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-09 12:48 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-09 12:37 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-09 07:39 -0500
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-09 16:57 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-09 12:03 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-09 12:22 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-09 14:29 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-09 20:36 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-10 10:10 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 11:13 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-09 14:18 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-09 20:31 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 09:10 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-09 12:19 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-09 08:51 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-09 12:17 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-07 18:03 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 18:52 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-08 07:24 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-08 05:37 -0700
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-08 09:34 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-08 07:44 -0700
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-08 14:58 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-08 15:03 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-08 13:14 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-08 14:47 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-08 10:24 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-07 22:41 +0000
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-07 21:20 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-08 10:27 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-08 10:28 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-08 14:45 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-08 09:50 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-07 22:35 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-07 13:58 -0700
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-07 17:31 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-07 22:28 +0000
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-07 19:14 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 18:50 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-08 10:04 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-08 11:12 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-08 10:39 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-04-08 12:11 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-08 07:34 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-08 12:36 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-08 07:38 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-08 07:11 -0500
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-08 13:59 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-08 18:01 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-08 17:22 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-08 18:28 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-08 13:01 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-08 14:17 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-08 12:52 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-09 09:39 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-09 12:46 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-09 12:26 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-09 12:16 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-09 14:23 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-09 20:29 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-10 07:51 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 10:48 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-10 12:09 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-10 12:05 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-09 10:19 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-09 16:42 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-09 14:15 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-10 10:13 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 11:14 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-10 07:22 -0500
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-10 14:44 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 11:44 -0400
                Turdv is a Troll that uses windows. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-10 12:01 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-09 20:35 +0000
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-09 14:04 -0700
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-10 10:20 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-09 10:19 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Mel <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-09 17:27 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-09 11:42 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Mel <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-09 17:49 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-09 18:00 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-09 18:16 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-09 12:04 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-09 12:09 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-09 18:53 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-09 13:09 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-09 19:18 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-09 13:48 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-09 14:16 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-09 11:27 -0700
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-09 14:48 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-09 21:27 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-09 15:35 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-09 20:27 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-09 20:41 +0000
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-09 17:24 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-09 20:22 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-09 20:20 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-09 15:16 -0700
                The Zeke dissembling layer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-09 19:07 -0400
                Re: The Zeke dissembling layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-09 23:09 +0000
                Re: The Zeke dissembling layer Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-10 02:33 +0200
                Re: The Zeke dissembling layer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-09 20:40 -0400
                Re: The Zeke dissembling layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-09 20:46 -0400
                Re: The Zeke dissembling layer "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-09 21:05 -0400
                Re: The Zeke dissembling layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-09 20:19 -0600
                Re: The Zeke dissembling layer Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-10 04:38 +0200
                Re: The Zeke dissembling layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-10 02:41 +0000
                Re: The Zeke dissembling layer Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-10 04:51 +0200
                Re: The Zeke dissembling layer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-10 06:41 -0500
                Re: The Zeke dissembling layer -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-10 05:43 -0700
                Re: The Zeke dissembling layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 11:28 -0400
                Here's a fart for you to sniff, Turdv. GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-10 12:00 -0600
                Re: The Zeke dissembling layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-10 12:00 -0600
                Re: The Zeke dissembling layer DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-10 10:48 -0400
                WrongB the LinCultist.  Guffaw!!! GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-10 11:59 -0600
                Re: The Zeke dissembling layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-10 11:57 -0600
                Re: The Zeke dissembling layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-10 02:37 +0000
                Re: The Zeke dissembling layer Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-04-10 04:48 +0200
                Re: The Zeke dissembling layer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-10 06:08 -0400
                Re: The Zeke dissembling layer -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-10 03:50 -0700
                Here, it's all wank, no work. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-09 19:50 -0700
                Re: Here, it's all wank, no work. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 09:14 -0400
                Re: The Zeke dissembling layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-09 20:18 -0600
                Re: Christopher John Ahlstrom enjoys the male penis "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-09 20:07 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-09 20:00 -0400
                What's optimal ? ! Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-09 18:40 -0700
                Re: What's optimal ? ! Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-09 22:00 -0400
                My 3 year old OCZ Vertex 2 SSD is blazing fast, reliable. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-09 19:29 -0700
                Re: My 3 year old OCZ Vertex 2 SSD is blazing fast, reliable. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-09 22:33 -0400
                My 3 year old OCZ Vertex 2 SSD is blazing fast, reliable. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-09 19:40 -0700
                Re: My 3 year old OCZ Vertex 2 SSD is blazing fast, reliable. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-09 22:55 -0400
                My 3 year old OCZ Vertex 2 SSD is blazing fast, reliable. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-09 20:07 -0700
                OCZ Vertex 4 SATA III, 256 Gigs. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-09 20:14 -0700
                Re: OCZ Vertex 4 SATA III, 256 Gigs. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 10:42 -0400
                Re: My 3 year old OCZ Vertex 2 SSD is blazing fast, reliable. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-10 01:21 -0400
                OCZ Vertex 4 SATA III, 256 Gigs, $474. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-09 23:00 -0700
                OCZ Vertex 4 SATA III, 256 Gigs. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-09 23:10 -0700
                Re: OCZ Vertex 4 SATA III, 256 Gigs, $474. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-10 08:32 -0400
                OCZ Vertex 4 SATA III, 256 Gigs, $474. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-10 05:57 -0700
                This "hobo" is doing better than DFS. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-10 06:10 -0700
                Re: This "hobo" is doing better than DFS. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-10 09:18 -0400
                Re: This "hobo" is doing better than DFS. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 11:31 -0400
                Re: OCZ Vertex 4 SATA III, 256 Gigs, $474. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 11:12 -0400
                Re: My 3 year old OCZ Vertex 2 SSD is blazing fast, reliable. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 10:46 -0400
                Re: My 3 year old OCZ Vertex 2 SSD is blazing fast, reliable. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 09:16 -0400
                Re: My 3 year old OCZ Vertex 2 SSD is blazing fast, reliable. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 09:12 -0400
                Re: My 3 year old OCZ Vertex 2 SSD is blazing fast, reliable. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 09:09 -0400
                I have a OCZ Vertex 4 SATA III, 256 Gigs. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-10 06:15 -0700
                Re: I have a OCZ Vertex 4 SATA III, 256 Gigs. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-10 09:41 -0400
                My (top rated) SSD is 2.54 times faster than DFS'. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-10 07:44 -0700
                Re: My (top rated) SSD is 2.54 times faster than DFS'. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-12 08:04 -0400
                The Vector 4 remains "top rated". Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-12 07:13 -0700
                Re: I have a OCZ Vertex 4 SATA III, 256 Gigs. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 11:35 -0400
                Re: I have a OCZ Vertex 4 SATA III, 256 Gigs. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-10 08:59 -0700
                I have a OCZ Vertex 4 SATA III, 256 Gigs. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-10 09:38 -0700
                Re: I have a OCZ Vertex 4 SATA III, 256 Gigs. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 15:07 -0400
                CrystalDiskMark 3_0_4. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-10 17:47 -0700
                Re: CrystalDiskMark 3_0_4. ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-11 01:27 +0000
                Re: CrystalDiskMark 3_0_4. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 23:04 -0400
                "100% drive life"; no degregation. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-11 00:21 -0700
                Re: "100% drive life"; no degregation. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-11 12:55 -0400
                Cell phones are what keeps your girlfriend entertained. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-11 11:05 -0700
                Re: "100% drive life"; no degregation. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-12 07:51 -0400
                The i7-4790S has "HD Graphics 4600" built in. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-12 06:02 -0700
                Re: The i7-4790S has "HD Graphics 4600" built in. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-12 11:35 -0400
                When idle, the i7-4790S consumes less power, 65 Watts. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-12 09:31 -0700
                Re: When idle, the i7-4790S consumes less power, 65 Watts. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-12 15:37 -0400
                Thank God for cell phones and laptops. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-12 19:23 -0700
                Re: Thank God for cell phones and laptops. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-13 06:06 -0700
                Re: Thank God for cell phones and laptops. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-13 10:47 -0400
                @Slimer is anonymous, ashamed. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-13 08:29 -0700
                Re: Thank God for cell phones and laptops. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-13 08:45 -0700
                I'm the direct opposite of a road warrior. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-13 09:12 -0700
                Re: I'm the direct opposite of a road warrior. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-13 09:36 -0700
                Re: Thank God for cell phones and laptops. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-13 13:05 -0400
                Re: Thank God for cell phones and laptops. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-13 11:05 -0700
                Re: Thank God for cell phones and laptops. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-13 17:42 -0400
                You couldn't GIVE me a $10,000 gaming laptop. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-13 16:48 -0700
                Re: You couldn't GIVE me a $10,000 gaming laptop. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-13 17:45 -0700
                IO operations per second. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-13 22:12 -0700
                Re: You couldn't GIVE me a $10,000 gaming laptop. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-14 08:57 -0400
                Re: You couldn't GIVE me a $10,000 gaming laptop. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-14 08:33 -0700
                Re: You couldn't GIVE me a $10,000 gaming laptop. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-14 12:18 -0400
                Re: You couldn't GIVE me a $10,000 gaming laptop. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-14 11:15 -0700
                Re: You couldn't GIVE me a $10,000 gaming laptop. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-14 18:23 -0400
                Re: You couldn't GIVE me a $10,000 gaming laptop. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-14 15:27 -0700
                Today, the Mac Mini is a REAL desktop PC. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-14 09:56 -0700
                Re: You couldn't GIVE me a $10,000 gaming laptop. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-13 22:33 -0400
                Re: You couldn't GIVE me a $10,000 gaming laptop. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-14 04:08 -0700
                Re: You couldn't GIVE me a $10,000 gaming laptop. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-14 09:00 -0400
                Re: You couldn't GIVE me a $10,000 gaming laptop. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-14 08:47 -0400
                Road warriors. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-13 08:04 -0700
                Re: Road warriors. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2015-04-13 08:58 -0700
                Re: I have a OCZ Vertex 4 SATA III, 256 Gigs. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 11:32 -0400
                Re: My 3 year old OCZ Vertex 2 SSD is blazing fast, reliable. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-10 11:15 -0400
                Hour·long, 1080p, surround·sound videos are gigaBytes each. Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-10 09:15 -0700
                Re: Hour·long, 1080p, surround·sound videos are gigaBytes each. Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-10 15:05 -0400
                Cell phones are NOTHING compared my 4K IPS monitor... Jeff-Relf.Me <@.> - 2015-04-09 19:15 -0700
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-10 07:07 -0500
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-04-10 07:27 -0500
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-09 11:08 -0700
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-09 17:04 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-09 20:38 +0000
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-09 17:17 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-10 10:25 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-09 17:00 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-08 14:16 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-08 12:59 +0000
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-08 14:47 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-04-08 10:02 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-08 14:15 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-08 14:14 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-04-08 11:48 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Tomas <tgif9fri@numo.net> - 2015-04-08 11:56 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-08 17:25 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-08 12:02 -0700
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-08 14:07 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-08 22:09 +0000
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-08 19:14 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-08 13:12 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 18:49 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 21:40 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-07 12:39 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-07 17:30 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-07 17:07 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 18:47 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 10:15 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer ronb <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2015-04-07 16:21 +0000
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-07 13:05 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 18:45 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-04-07 10:48 -0700
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 20:46 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 20:48 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 15:41 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 00:05 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 18:45 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-07 12:41 +0100
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-07 10:13 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-02 21:46 -0400
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-02 13:26 -0500
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 15:40 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2015-04-03 00:04 +0200
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-02 18:40 -0600
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2015-04-03 11:31 -0500
                Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-03 11:52 -0600
          Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-04-01 11:55 -0600
          Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-04-02 13:44 +0100
  Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-03-31 13:56 +0100
    Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-31 09:50 -0400
      Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-03-31 14:58 +0100
        Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 10:18 -0400
        Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-31 10:39 -0400
          Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-03-31 16:46 +0100
    Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer GreyCloud <mist@cumulus.com> - 2015-03-31 11:30 -0600
  Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-31 12:37 -0500
    Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 16:11 -0400
    Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-31 20:15 +0000
      Re: The Vista Upgrade Layer Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 21:18 -0400

csiph-web