Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #286908
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: NTFS is case-sensitive |
| Date | 2015-03-30 23:09 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <mfd34r$o97$2@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (10 earlier) <mfa8fq$7c6$3@dont-email.me> <D13DF49A.49411%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <bbhg03f.3p@rooftop.invalid> <mfbk7j$4fp$3@dont-email.me> <fa167a7e-3c05-4b48-aec3-bc0332c29beb@googlegroups.com> |
On 3/30/2015 2:35 PM, Steve Carroll wrote: > On Monday, March 30, 2015 at 7:49:30 AM UTC-6, DFS wrote: >> On 3/29/2015 10:16 PM, owl wrote: >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 3/29/15, 6:22 PM, in article mfa8fq$7c6$3@dont-email.me, >>>> "DFS" <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>> >>>>> On 3/29/2015 12:18 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 3/29/15, 8:06 AM, in article mf94c6$s6t$1@dont-email.me, >>>>>> "DFS" <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> pwnage earned by changing the case of one letter? >>>>>>>>> Epic! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> owl is a tricky bastard and it's hard to get one by >>>>>>>>> him. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Congrats! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks. Wish I could say it was fully on purpose. :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The plot thickens... you spelled it Owl by accident? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That would change it from Snit pwnage to owl self-nuke, >>>>>>> and your trophy must be returned. >>>>>> >>>>>> Fair enough. I humbly return the trophy... and grant Owl >>>>>> the mushroom cloud reward. :) >>>>> >>>>> It's good you came clean - 5 months later - but an 'honest >>>>> and honorable' man would've never let my assumption stand in >>>>> the first place. I always figured you intentionally wrote >>>>> 'Owl' to try and trick him, since you were in the middle of a >>>>> case-sensitivity debate. >>>>> >>>>> Instead of admitting it right then, you took credit for it >>>>> several times when I brought it up as pwnage, and said "That >>>>> was fun". >>>>> >>>>> Why did you finally admit it wasn't intentional? >>> >>>> It was fun to see him self-nuke. Never implied it was >>>> intentional. >>> >>> In your deranged minds it is a self-nuke for me to correct your >>> misspelling of my name when you are using that misspelled name to >>> address me in conversation, as determined circumstantially by the >>> fact that it was used in a sentence where one would normally >>> expect to find himself being addressed. "Hey, jOe, where you >>> going with that gun in your hand?" >>> >>> Somehow in your (French-influenced?) mush-heads, not continuing >>> on as if the misspelling were without consequence, i.e. in the >>> way that a case-insensitive file system would react, is evidence >>> of my own case-insensitivity, and therefore worthy of a self-nuke >>> award. >> >> Yes, lamer. Exactly. >> >> A case-sensitive filesystem or programming language or gibbon >> wouldn't have recognized Owl as your name. You did. Normally not >> worth noting, except this time you did it while in the middle of >> arguing FOR case-sensitivity. >> >> epic self-nuke! > > Nah, he merely recognized Snit was "referencing" him in that post. That's a different issue, and in fact it's irrelevant. Whether owl was replying to a post directed to him or to someone else, he recognized his name even though it was spelled Owl (a case change in one letter). owl: "There's no 'O' in my name." A case-sensitive filesystem wouldn't recognize it at all, but a case-insensitive filesystem would. Clear and huge self-nuke, because owl was ranting (not to mention lying) about needing a case-sensitive filesystem. Too bad it was inadvertent on Snit's part; epic pwnage is better than epic self-nuke. > Don't forget what Snit asked: > "What made you think I was referencing you?" That came later. > And the answer is simple... > > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!original/comp.os.linux.advocacy/uPMC4QazReY/2TkK7iwGDcoJ > > > >>> Since exactly the opposite is true, and the misspelling was >>> detected, not overlooked, I can only say that you both have my >>> pity for having such broken reasoning skills. :) >> >> Learn some humility, boy. Accept your self-wrought defeat. > > LOL! Sorry, he owns you two on this one. Wrong. And you're self-nuking by siding with the nukee.
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 22:46 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-27 19:29 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 08:45 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 16:00 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 16:26 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 12:56 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 17:06 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 10:32 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-28 13:08 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 22:22 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-28 21:40 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 22:23 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-29 11:06 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 15:12 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-29 21:22 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 23:08 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 09:18 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-29 21:22 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 18:27 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 02:16 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 09:49 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 08:24 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 17:06 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 12:19 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 23:54 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-31 00:06 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 17:12 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 17:41 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 17:15 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-31 01:07 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 18:21 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 12:24 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 20:46 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-31 01:52 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 19:10 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 11:35 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 23:09 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 22:01 -0700
NTFS is not the best filesystem taka0038@gmail.com - 2015-03-31 18:52 -0700
Re: NTFS is not the best filesystem Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 22:51 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 09:48 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 08:44 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 09:37 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 20:50 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 19:14 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 17:09 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 00:24 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 22:26 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 16:09 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 13:06 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 17:15 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 17:28 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 18:35 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 12:57 +0000
csiph-web