Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #286887

Re: NTFS is case-sensitive

From	DFS <nospam@dfs.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	Re: NTFS is case-sensitive
Date	2015-03-30 20:50 -0400
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<mfcr03$5iv$6@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(9 earlier) <D13D73F5.493D0%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <mfa8fq$7c6$3@dont-email.me> <D13DF49A.49411%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <mfbk6m$4fp$2@dont-email.me> <D13EBD77.49467%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>

Show all headers | View raw

On 3/30/2015 11:44 AM, Snit wrote:
> On 3/30/15, 6:48 AM, in article mfbk6m$4fp$2@dont-email.me, "DFS"
> <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/29/2015 9:27 PM, Snit wrote:
>>> On 3/29/15, 6:22 PM, in article mfa8fq$7c6$3@dont-email.me, "DFS"
>>> <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 3/29/2015 12:18 PM, Snit wrote:
>>>>> On 3/29/15, 8:06 AM, in article mf94c6$s6t$1@dont-email.me, "DFS"
>>>>> <nospam@dfs.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>> pwnage earned by changing the case of one letter?  Epic!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> owl is a tricky bastard and it's hard to get one by him.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Congrats!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks. Wish I could say it was fully on purpose. :)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The plot thickens... you spelled it Owl by accident?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> That would change it from Snit pwnage to owl self-nuke, and your trophy
>>>>>> must be returned.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fair enough. I humbly return the trophy... and grant Owl the mushroom cloud
>>>>> reward. :)
>>>>
>>>> It's good you came clean - 5 months later - but an 'honest and
>>>> honorable' man would've never let my assumption stand in the first
>>>> place.  I always figured you intentionally wrote 'Owl' to try and trick
>>>> him, since you were in the middle of a case-sensitivity debate.
>>>>
>>>> Instead of admitting it right then, you took credit for it several times
>>>> when I brought it up as pwnage, and said "That was fun".
>>>>
>>>> Why did you finally admit it wasn't intentional?
>>>
>>> It was fun to see him self-nuke. Never implied it was intentional.
>>
>>
>> What?  Of course you did, when you let stand many times my assumption
>> that you did it intentionally.
>>
>> It's just more of that 'honesty and honorableness' you're crammed full of.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> OK, your games get old but by all means please quote where I did as you say.
>
> You will fail.

Again, I don't make accusations of your lying and dishonesty unless I 
have support:

================================================================================
10/24/2014

DFS to owl: "Face it: you were pwned by Snit.  You'll get him back one day."

Snit response: "He will? Unlikely..."
================================================================================
10/25/2014

DFS to owl: "And it's actually historic: you were completely pwned by 
Snit changing the case in just one letter."

Snit response: "He will never admit it."
================================================================================
2/14/2015:

DFS: "Snit literally changed the case of /one/ letter (o to O), and took
control of owl, who was insisting case-sensitivity in OSes is a good
thing, but recognized Snit's case-change because in the real world OwL
is case-insensitive.  pwnage by changing the case of one letter?!  Epic!"

Snit response: "Thank you. That was fun."
================================================================================
3/28/2015

DFS: "I had to go back and look at the original pwnage Snit made on you.

  Snit: "Poor Owl... he hates when I prove him wrong. Oh well."

  owl being pwned: "There's no "O" in my name."

  You recognized Owl as your name, whereas I didn't recognize Owl at all.

  Close but no cigar for you, hoss."

Snit response: "That was excellent."
================================================================================

In each of those 4 instances, I said Snit pwned owl, and you agreed and 
let me think you pwned him by intentionally spelling it Owl.  Turns out 
you did it unintentionally, and somehow figured that out 5 months later.

> Then declare yourself the "winner". But go for it.

Of course I win.  Nobody can lose by labeling you a liar, or 
sarcastically referring to you as 'honest and honorable'.

If you were truly honest, why did it take you 5 months to finally admit 
"Wish I could say it was fully on purpose."?

Feels good to tell the truth, eh?  You should try it more often.

Thread

NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 22:46 +0000
  Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-27 19:29 -0400
  Re: NTFS is case-sensitive John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 08:45 -0700
    Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 16:00 +0000
      Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 16:26 +0000
        Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 12:56 -0400
          Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 17:06 +0000
          Re: NTFS is case-sensitive John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 10:32 -0700
          Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-28 13:08 -0700
            Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 22:22 -0400
              Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-28 21:40 -0700
                Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 22:23 -0700
                Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-29 11:06 -0400
                Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 15:12 +0000
                Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-29 21:22 -0400
                Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 23:08 -0700
                Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 09:18 -0700
                Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-29 21:22 -0400
                Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 18:27 -0700
                Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 02:16 +0000
                Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 09:49 -0400
                Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 08:24 -0700
                Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 17:06 +0000
                Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 12:19 -0700
                Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 23:54 +0000
                Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-31 00:06 +0000
                Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 17:12 -0700
                Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 17:41 -0700
                Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 17:15 -0700
                Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-31 01:07 +0000
                Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 18:21 -0700
                Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 12:24 -0700
                Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 20:46 -0400
                Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-31 01:52 +0000
                Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 19:10 -0700
                Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 11:35 -0700
                Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 23:09 -0400
                Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 22:01 -0700
                NTFS is not the best filesystem taka0038@gmail.com - 2015-03-31 18:52 -0700
                Re: NTFS is not the best filesystem Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 22:51 -0400
                Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 09:48 -0400
                Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 08:44 -0700
                Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 09:37 -0700
                Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 20:50 -0400
                Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 19:14 -0700
          Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 17:09 -0700
            Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 00:24 +0000
              Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 22:26 -0400
    Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 16:09 +0000
  Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 13:06 -0400
    Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 17:15 +0000
      Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 17:28 +0000
        Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 18:35 +0000
    Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 12:57 +0000

csiph-web