Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #286884
| From | DFS <nospam@dfs.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: NTFS is case-sensitive |
| Date | 2015-03-30 20:46 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <mfcqo6$5iv$3@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (9 earlier) <mfa8fq$7c6$3@dont-email.me> <D13DF49A.49411%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <bbhg03f.3p@rooftop.invalid> <mfbk7j$4fp$3@dont-email.me> <shfu30.3e@rooftop.invalid> |
On 3/30/2015 1:06 PM, owl wrote: > DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >> On 3/29/2015 10:16 PM, owl wrote: >>> Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: >>>> On 3/29/15, 6:22 PM, in article mfa8fq$7c6$3@dont-email.me, "DFS" >>>> <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>> >>>>> On 3/29/2015 12:18 PM, Snit wrote: >>>>>> On 3/29/15, 8:06 AM, in article mf94c6$s6t$1@dont-email.me, "DFS" >>>>>> <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>>> pwnage earned by changing the case of one letter? Epic! >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> owl is a tricky bastard and it's hard to get one by him. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Congrats! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks. Wish I could say it was fully on purpose. :) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The plot thickens... you spelled it Owl by accident? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That would change it from Snit pwnage to owl self-nuke, and your trophy >>>>>>> must be returned. >>>>>> >>>>>> Fair enough. I humbly return the trophy... and grant Owl the mushroom cloud >>>>>> reward. :) >>>>> >>>>> It's good you came clean - 5 months later - but an 'honest and >>>>> honorable' man would've never let my assumption stand in the first >>>>> place. I always figured you intentionally wrote 'Owl' to try and trick >>>>> him, since you were in the middle of a case-sensitivity debate. >>>>> >>>>> Instead of admitting it right then, you took credit for it several times >>>>> when I brought it up as pwnage, and said "That was fun". >>>>> >>>>> Why did you finally admit it wasn't intentional? >>> >>>> It was fun to see him self-nuke. Never implied it was intentional. >>> >>> In your deranged minds it is a self-nuke for me to correct your >>> misspelling of my name when you are using that misspelled name to address >>> me in conversation, as determined circumstantially by the fact that it >>> was used in a sentence where one would normally expect to find himself >>> being addressed. "Hey, jOe, where you going with that gun in your hand?" >>> >>> Somehow in your (French-influenced?) mush-heads, not continuing >>> on as if the misspelling were without consequence, i.e. in the way >>> that a case-insensitive file system would react, is evidence of my >>> own case-insensitivity, and therefore worthy of a self-nuke award. > >> Yes, lamer. Exactly. > >> A case-sensitive filesystem or programming language or gibbon wouldn't >> have recognized Owl as your name. You did. Normally not worth noting, >> except this time you did it while in the middle of arguing FOR >> case-sensitivity. > >> epic self-nuke! > > So if he had addressed me as "Bob" in a direct reply to my post, > and I had corrected him that "Bob" is not my name, that would > also have been a self-nuke? wtf do I have to explain your self-nuke 20000x for? This is the last time: You didn't say "'Owl' is not my name." You said "There's no "O" in my name." You recognized 'Owl' as your name (even with the capital O), just like a case-insensitive filesystem would. But earlier that day you were screeching "The computer should accommodate my need for a case-sensitive filesystem." s to the e to the l to the f to the - to the n to the u to the k to the e!
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-27 22:46 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-27 19:29 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 08:45 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 16:00 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 16:26 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 12:56 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 17:06 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 10:32 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-28 13:08 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 22:22 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-28 21:40 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 22:23 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-29 11:06 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 15:12 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-29 21:22 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 23:08 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 09:18 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-29 21:22 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-29 18:27 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 02:16 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 09:49 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 08:24 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 17:06 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 12:19 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-30 23:54 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-31 00:06 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 17:12 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 17:41 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 17:15 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-31 01:07 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 18:21 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 12:24 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 20:46 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-31 01:52 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 19:10 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 11:35 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 23:09 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 22:01 -0700
NTFS is not the best filesystem taka0038@gmail.com - 2015-03-31 18:52 -0700
Re: NTFS is not the best filesystem Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-31 22:51 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 09:48 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 08:44 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 09:37 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 20:50 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-03-30 19:14 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-03-28 17:09 -0700
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 00:24 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 22:26 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 16:09 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-28 13:06 -0400
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 17:15 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 17:28 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-28 18:35 +0000
Re: NTFS is case-sensitive owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-29 12:57 +0000
csiph-web