Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #286377
| From | "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Google loses ruling in Safari tracking case |
| Date | 2015-03-27 14:42 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <mf487d$tkd$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
<quote> Google loses ruling in Safari tracking case The floodgates are now open for UK users to sue Google over privacy violations tied to tracking cookies. March 27, 2015 In a landmark ruling, the UK's Court of Appeal has dismissed Google's request to prevent British Web users from suing the company over tracking cookies and privacy violations. The case revolves around Apple's Safari browser, Google's Safari workaround, and cookies. In spite of default privacy settings and user preferences -- including an opt-out of consent to be tracked by cookies -- Google's tracking cookies gathered information on Safari browser users for nine months in 2011 and 2012. Google profits from DoubleClick tracking cookies by installing them on computing devices and leading users to tailored advertisements. The DoubleClick ID Cookie, when settled within a user's browser, tracks and gathers data about the user based on Web activity and searches. This information can include surfing habits, ethnicity, sexual interests, religious and political beliefs, and potentially financial data. Three British computer users brought the case to court, arguing that Google ignored consumer wishes to not have tracking cookies installed on their machines. Google argued the point was moot because consumers suffered no financial hardship due to the practice. The UK's Court of Appeal disagreed. According to the court's judgment: "This is a David and Goliath victory," one of the claimants, Marc Bradshaw, said in a statement from the Google Action Group. "The Court of Appeal has ensured Google cannot use its vast resources to evade English justice. Ordinary computer users like me will now have the right to hold this giant to account before the courts for its unacceptable, immoral and unjust actions." "This is an important decision that prevents Google from evading or trivialising these very serious intrusions into the privacy of British consumers," he said in the statement. "Google, a company that makes billions from advertising knowledge, claims that it was unaware that was secretly tracking Apple users for a period of nine months and had argued that no harm was done because the matter was trivial as consumers had not lost out financially. The Court of Appeal saw these arguments for what they are: a breach of consumers' civil rights and actionable before the English courts." </quote>
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Google loses ruling in Safari tracking case "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-27 14:42 -0400
Re: Google loses ruling in Safari tracking case Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-27 14:47 -0400
Re: Google loses ruling in Safari tracking case "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-27 14:55 -0400
Re: Google loses ruling in Safari tracking case Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-27 20:20 +0100
Re: Google loses ruling in Safari tracking case "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-27 15:34 -0400
Re: Google loses ruling in Safari tracking case Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-27 20:52 +0100
Re: Google loses ruling in Safari tracking case "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-27 17:26 -0400
Re: Google loses ruling in Safari tracking case chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-28 07:41 -0500
Re: Google loses ruling in Safari tracking case Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-28 10:13 -0400
Re: Google loses ruling in Safari tracking case vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-03-28 08:04 -0700
Re: Google loses ruling in Safari tracking case William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2015-03-28 15:18 +0000
Re: Google loses ruling in Safari tracking case chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2015-03-28 11:35 -0500
Re: Google loses ruling in Safari tracking case Donald Miller <donaldmiller955@mail.com> - 2015-03-28 12:52 -0400
Re: Google loses ruling in Safari tracking case Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2015-03-28 18:46 -0400
Re: Google loses ruling in Safari tracking case "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-28 13:13 -0400
Re: Google loses ruling in Safari tracking case Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-27 16:49 -0400
Re: Google loses ruling in Safari tracking case "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2015-03-27 17:29 -0400
Re: Google loses ruling in Safari tracking case Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-03-27 19:26 -0400
Re: Google loses ruling in Safari tracking case John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-03-27 14:39 -0700
csiph-web