Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > uk.comp.sys.mac > #181493
| From | "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | uk.comp.sys.mac |
| Subject | You are indeed a very wise owl :) Thanks once again for a most interesting article. |
| Date | 2025-07-27 10:06 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mem8h6Ff7jgU3@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <mem599Ff7jgU1@mid.individual.net> |
On 27/07/2025 09:11, David B. wrote: > Today's Blog by Howard Oakley is well worth reading! > > = > > When The Economist publishes two articles, one of them a leader, about > the same issue you know it needs to be taken seriously. In its edition > of 19 July 2025, one of its leaders is titled To survive the AI age, the > web needs a new business model, and a longer article in its Business > section states AI is killing the web. Can anything save it? Both are > well worth the effort of creating an account to read them. The leader > states crisply that “the danger is that, as answer-engines take readers > away, they are removing the incentive for content to be created,” > concluding that “if nothing changes, the risk is of a modern-day tragedy > of the commons. The shared resource of the open web will be over- > exploited, leading to its eventual exhaustion.” > > The problem lies in what it so appropriately refers to as Google’s > change from being a search to an answer engine, a subject further > explored by the Pew Research Center’s timely report of their study > summarised here by humans. That demonstrates that Google “users are less > likely to click on links when an AI summary appears in the results”. > > These themes are central to my previous account of PageRank and > plagiarism. As with others who publish original work on the web, I’m > used to sites that copy entire articles, such as MacMegasite. Within an > hour of its publication here, for example, that had stolen the whole of > Friday’s Mac article, word for word. > > More at ..... > > https://eclecticlight.co/2025/07/27/last-week-on-my-mac-🦉-no-ai-content/ > > I posted this as a comment, but I doubt it will appear:- > > "An excellent article, Howard, which I will share with folk I hope will > read it. Thank you. I have no doubt that everything you say and do is > done so in good faith. > However, you have used and have recommended a product called EtreCheck, > made available by a 'Will 'o the wisp' character that you know > absolutely nothing about. I think you have been too trusting in that > regard. Perhaps it is now time to take a closer look at the developer of > the product." Sadly, *MY* comments are not reproduced! Why IS that?
Back to uk.comp.sys.mac | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
You are indeed a very wise owl :) Thanks once again for a most interesting article. "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-07-27 10:06 +0100
Re: You are indeed a very wise owl :) Thanks once again for a most interesting article. Tyrone <none@none.none> - 2025-07-27 19:07 +0000
Re: You are indeed a very wise owl :) Thanks once again for a most interesting article. "David B." <BD@hotmail.co.uk> - 2025-07-27 23:17 +0100
csiph-web