Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | jacob navia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: What is "complexifying" C? |
| Date | 2015-03-19 23:06 +0100 |
| Organization | lccwin |
| Message-ID | <mefh8n$6b5$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <GiWNw.124245$hv4.1615@fx04.iad> <20150318154325.149@kylheku.com> <PzAOw.87639$jx4.78081@fx27.iad> <programming-20150319153533@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <W2COw.61025$uF6.16057@fx17.iad> |
Le 19/03/2015 16:37, Greg Martin a écrit : > Well, sure. Let's add constructors-destructors, lambdas, closures and > range iterators to C. While we're at it lets call it Ruby++. It is appalling the lack of arguments that you show here. FORTRAN has operator overloading and did not change its name to Ruby++ either. What C++ hasn't got is the art of knowing WHEN TO STOP adding features. What you do not get is when some features are necessary! HOW do you solve the problem of adding new numerical types to the language? Look at what happened with complex numbers. There are MANY ways of doing a complex division, if you care about speed, or accuracy or robustness, or other criteria. With the language solution you 1) Complexify enormously ALL the C implementations that have to add that feature. 2) You tie the user to its implementation decisions. He/she can't change the way a complex division is done. Can you propose another solution? And please, telling us "I don't use any new numerical types" is NOT a solution. Thanks
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What is "complexifying" C? jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2015-03-16 22:55 +0100
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-03-16 22:55 +0000
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-03-16 16:41 -0700
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-03-17 00:05 +0000
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-03-17 01:12 +0000
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-03-25 13:58 -0700
Re: What is "complexifying" C? jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2015-03-17 07:16 +0100
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Greg Martin <greg.at.softsprocket@dot.com> - 2015-03-17 13:50 +0000
Re: What is "complexifying" C? jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2015-03-17 14:59 +0100
Re: What is "complexifying" C? jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2015-03-17 15:22 +0100
Re: What is "complexifying" C? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-03-17 16:16 +0100
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2015-03-17 14:39 +0000
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Greg Martin <greg.at.softsprocket@dot.com> - 2015-03-17 15:23 +0000
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-03-18 15:40 -0700
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2015-03-18 22:49 +0000
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Greg Martin <greg.at.softsprocket@dot.com> - 2015-03-19 13:55 +0000
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Greg Martin <greg.at.softsprocket@dot.com> - 2015-03-19 15:37 +0000
Re: What is "complexifying" C? jacob navia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2015-03-19 23:06 +0100
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Greg Martin <greg.at.softsprocket@dot.com> - 2015-03-19 22:38 +0000
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-20 19:43 +1300
Re: What is "complexifying" C? jacob navia <jacob@jacob.remcomp.fr> - 2015-03-20 07:49 +0100
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-20 02:29 -0500
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-20 21:37 +1300
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-20 03:40 -0500
Re: What is "complexifying" C? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-03-20 10:18 +0100
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-21 00:19 -0500
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-03-20 03:15 -0700
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-22 13:51 +1300
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-22 15:21 +1300
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-03-22 00:57 -0700
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-22 22:28 +1300
Re: What is "complexifying" C? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-03-22 02:59 -0700
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-03-22 11:16 -0700
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-23 07:25 +1300
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-03-22 12:06 -0700
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-23 17:01 +1300
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-03-23 03:09 -0700
Re: What is "complexifying" C? fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2015-03-23 01:42 -0700
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-22 19:32 +0100
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-22 17:34 -0500
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-03-22 20:07 -0400
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-23 00:00 -0500
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-23 18:04 +1300
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-03-23 23:22 -0400
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-03-22 14:54 -0400
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-23 00:35 +0100
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-23 17:06 +1300
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-23 17:25 +1300
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Martin Shobe <martin.shobe@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-22 23:33 -0500
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-23 18:01 +1300
Re: What is "complexifying" C? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-03-23 09:41 -0400
Re: What is "complexifying" C? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-03-23 10:23 -0400
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-24 07:10 +1300
Re: What is "complexifying" C? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-03-23 14:57 -0400
Re: What is "complexifying" C? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-03-24 09:36 +0100
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-03-24 08:42 +0000
Re: What is "complexifying" C? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2015-03-24 11:23 +0100
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2015-03-24 10:52 +0000
Re: What is "complexifying" C? raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-03-29 16:58 +0000
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-22 02:38 +0100
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-03-22 09:11 -0400
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2015-03-20 06:30 -0500
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-03-20 10:31 +0000
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Greg Martin <greg.at.softsprocket@dot.com> - 2015-03-20 13:49 +0000
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-03-20 09:23 -0700
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-21 08:28 +1300
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-03-20 01:04 -0700
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-03-17 08:05 -0700
Re: What is "complexifying" C? jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2015-03-17 16:08 +0100
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-03-17 11:09 -0700
Re: What is "complexifying" C? jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2015-03-17 21:37 +0100
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-18 00:40 -0500
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-03-17 15:34 +0000
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-03-17 15:06 +0000
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2015-03-17 00:05 +0100
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Greg Martin <greg.at.softsprocket@dot.com> - 2015-03-16 23:20 +0000
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2015-03-17 16:42 +1300
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Mark Storkamp <mstorkamp@yahoo.com> - 2015-03-17 08:59 -0500
Re: What is "complexifying" C? jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2015-03-17 15:18 +0100
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-03-17 14:41 +0000
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-03-18 15:47 -0700
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-03-19 00:26 +0000
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-03-19 03:23 -0700
Re: What is "complexifying" C? Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-03-19 11:19 +0000
csiph-web