Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #37408
| From | Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Is it possible to have the following words (RP@ RP! SP@ SP!) on hardware data and return stack |
| Date | 2015-03-18 22:12 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <mecplp$5j3$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <21045760-f834-4d9c-9bb0-d13f2c1ff3b4@googlegroups.com> <55075824$0$23177$e4fe514c@dreader34.news.xs4all.nl> <me9q4m$io9$1@dont-email.me> <693cc2ba-15c8-4630-b518-7d80a17785d8@googlegroups.com> <2015Mar18.163001@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> |
Anton Ertl wrote: > JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> writes: >>Just a general question: How deep should the R and D stack be? >>( independent of the Multitasking ), I heard 32 - 128 range should be ok? > > Looking at > http://www.complang.tuwien.ac.at/misc/stack-caching-data/ > > I see the following stack needs > > compile: >32 (but not by much) > cross: 31 > gray: >32 > prims2x: >32 > > OTOH, Chuck Moore thinks that 6-deep stacks are sufficient. I guess, > if the software is written or adapted for a given stack depth, you can > live with much shallower stacks than for software written for deep > stacks. Chuck's cores have very little memory, so only small programs fit into them. For these small programs, the 6 elements are probably ok, for somewhat larger programs, it's no longer ok. -- Bernd Paysan "If you want it done right, you have to do it yourself" http://bernd-paysan.de/ net2o ID: kQusJzA;7*?t=uy@X}1GWr!+0qqp_Cn176t4(dQ*
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is it possible to have the following words (RP@ RP! SP@ SP!) on hardware data and return stack mfanyikazi@gmail.com - 2015-03-16 09:30 -0700
Re: Is it possible to have the following words (RP@ RP! SP@ SP!) on hardware data and return stack jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com - 2015-03-16 17:13 +0000
Re: Is it possible to have the following words (RP@ RP! SP@ SP!) on hardware data and return stack mfanyikazi@gmail.com - 2015-03-17 02:40 -0700
Re: Is it possible to have the following words (RP@ RP! SP@ SP!) on hardware data and return stack Jan Coombs <Jan-54 <jenfhaomndgfwutc@murmic.plus.com>> - 2015-03-18 01:53 +0000
Re: Is it possible to have the following words (RP@ RP! SP@ SP!) on hardware data and return stack rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-03-17 23:21 -0400
Re: Is it possible to have the following words (RP@ RP! SP@ SP!) on hardware data and return stack albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl (Albert van der Horst) - 2015-03-16 22:24 +0000
Re: Is it possible to have the following words (RP@ RP! SP@ SP!) on hardware data and return stack rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-03-17 14:01 -0400
Re: Is it possible to have the following words (RP@ RP! SP@ SP!) on hardware data and return stack JUERGEN <epldfpga@aol.com> - 2015-03-17 11:59 -0700
Re: Is it possible to have the following words (RP@ RP! SP@ SP!) on hardware data and return stack rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2015-03-17 16:28 -0400
Re: Is it possible to have the following words (RP@ RP! SP@ SP!) on hardware data and return stack anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2015-03-18 15:30 +0000
Re: Is it possible to have the following words (RP@ RP! SP@ SP!) on hardware data and return stack Bernd Paysan <bernd.paysan@gmx.de> - 2015-03-18 22:12 +0100
Re: Is it possible to have the following words (RP@ RP! SP@ SP!) on hardware data and return stack "Rod Pemberton" <buzz@notnotnontnooatno.cmm> - 2015-03-16 18:57 -0400
Re: Is it possible to have the following words (RP@ RP! SP@ SP!) on hardware data and return stack mfanyikazi@gmail.com - 2015-03-17 02:52 -0700
Re: Is it possible to have the following words (RP@ RP! SP@ SP!) on hardware data and return stack "Rod Pemberton" <buzz@notnotnontnooatno.cmm> - 2015-03-17 18:03 -0400
Re: Is it possible to have the following words (RP@ RP! SP@ SP!) on hardware data and return stack anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2015-03-18 14:39 +0000
Re: Is it possible to have the following words (RP@ RP! SP@ SP!) on hardware data and return stack mfanyikazi@gmail.com - 2015-03-17 02:58 -0700
Re: Is it possible to have the following words (RP@ RP! SP@ SP!) on hardware data and return stack anton@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at (Anton Ertl) - 2015-03-17 16:48 +0000
Re: Is it possible to have the following words (RP@ RP! SP@ SP!) on hardware data and return stack Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2015-03-18 12:16 +0100
Re: Is it possible to have the following words (RP@ RP! SP@ SP!) on hardware data and return stack Lars Brinkhoff <lars.spam@nocrew.org> - 2015-03-18 12:43 +0100
csiph-web