Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #31184

My way of defining what's invention ...

Show all headers | View raw

Jerry Stuckle wrote to me:

 >You didn't invent crap.  All you did was implement already developed
 >algorithms.  Something any programmer does every day.
 >All you're doing is making yourself look even more stupid.


You are a kind of stupid guy too..

Because you have to define what's an invention...

You are defining an invention as one that must have a quality of 9/10 or 
10/10 and you are taking into account  the criteria of "difficulty" an 
the "size" of the invention, you are saying that an invention that is 
not of a big size or/and of a degree of difficulty that is high is not 
an invention, but your way of defining invention is a sadistic way of 
defining what's an invention.


My inventions that i have talked before are inventions too, but
you have to have more "wisdom" to agree with me, you are a low
level person when it comes to the criteria of "wisdom".



Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

My way of defining what's invention ... Ramine <ramine@1.1> - 2015-02-22 18:38 -0800
  Re: My way of defining what's invention ... Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-02-22 21:01 -0500
  Re: My way of defining what's invention ... Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2015-02-23 10:52 +0100
  Re: My way of defining what's invention ... Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2015-02-23 11:39 +0100
  Re: My way of defining what's invention ... Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2015-02-23 12:12 +0100
    Re: My way of defining what's invention ... Silvio <silvio@internet.com> - 2015-02-23 12:26 +0100
      Re: My way of defining what's invention ... Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-02-23 12:17 +0000

csiph-web