Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: porting from 32-bit to 64-bit with fine-tooth comb? |
| Date | 2015-02-08 11:08 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <mb7g26$4nt$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <8c0baf78-2ed4-4012-8a87-df42391b5e75@googlegroups.com> |
On 07/02/2015 23:33, mbjorn@y7mail.com wrote: > I got this in a mailing list for a FOSS package that I use: > > "Another thing to note when running old code on 64-bit platforms is to > inspect the struct definitions that are used directly to store or read > binary data. There's no standard way to guarantee compatibility but > gcc has a "packed" pragma which should do the right thing combined > with explicit padding where needed," > > Is this a problem, that different word lengths can screw up > structures? Can unsigned int, for example, change length going from > a 32-bit system to 64? > One problem I found was with code that assumed a pointer was the same size as an int. On 64-bit machines, pointers will be usually be 64-bits, while ints tend to stay at 32-bits. Another problem was with using unions in a struct, where things might not line up in the way you expected. So if a union was of ints and pointers and was previously four bytes, might now be eight bytes because an element is a pointer. This can make things go wrong if you'd made assumptions about how it fits in with other members and unions. -- Bartc
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
porting from 32-bit to 64-bit with fine-tooth comb? mbjorn@y7mail.com - 2015-02-07 15:33 -0800
Re: porting from 32-bit to 64-bit with fine-tooth comb? wssimms@gmail.com - 2015-02-07 16:56 -0800
Re: porting from 32-bit to 64-bit with fine-tooth comb? jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2015-02-08 00:59 +0000
Re: porting from 32-bit to 64-bit with fine-tooth comb? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2015-02-07 17:22 -0800
Re: porting from 32-bit to 64-bit with fine-tooth comb? jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2015-02-08 01:43 +0000
Re: porting from 32-bit to 64-bit with fine-tooth comb? raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2015-02-08 16:16 +0000
Re: porting from 32-bit to 64-bit with fine-tooth comb? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-02-07 20:02 -0500
Re: porting from 32-bit to 64-bit with fine-tooth comb? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-02-08 02:18 +0000
Re: porting from 32-bit to 64-bit with fine-tooth comb? Bartc <bc@freeuk.com> - 2015-02-08 11:08 +0000
Re: porting from 32-bit to 64-bit with fine-tooth comb? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2015-02-09 21:20 +0000
Re: porting from 32-bit to 64-bit with fine-tooth comb? Nobody <nobody@nowhere.invalid> - 2015-02-09 21:35 +0000
Re: porting from 32-bit to 64-bit with fine-tooth comb? Lőrinczy Zsigmond <nospam@for.me> - 2015-04-03 16:07 +0200
Re: porting from 32-bit to 64-bit with fine-tooth comb? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2015-04-03 11:21 -0400
Re: porting from 32-bit to 64-bit with fine-tooth comb? Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2015-04-03 09:36 -0700
Re: porting from 32-bit to 64-bit with fine-tooth comb? Lőrinczy Zsigmond <nospam@for.me> - 2015-04-03 19:10 +0200
Re: porting from 32-bit to 64-bit with fine-tooth comb? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2015-04-04 21:05 +0000
Re: porting from 32-bit to 64-bit with fine-tooth comb? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-04-04 23:13 -0700
Re: porting from 32-bit to 64-bit with fine-tooth comb? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2015-04-11 04:19 +0000
Re: porting from 32-bit to 64-bit with fine-tooth comb? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2015-04-10 23:53 -0700
Re: porting from 32-bit to 64-bit with fine-tooth comb? Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2015-04-11 10:54 -0400
Re: porting from 32-bit to 64-bit with fine-tooth comb? Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2015-04-11 15:59 +0000
csiph-web