Re: list but not dirs?

From	Rich <rich@example.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.misc
Subject	Re: list but not dirs?
Date	2015-02-03 18:08 +0000
Organization	My Linux Box
Message-ID	<mar2r4$neh$2@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	<pan.2015.01.27.08.20.10@gmail.com> <maat1i$ipg$1@dont-email.me> <pan.2015.02.03.12.03.51@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Unknown <dog@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Jan 2015 14:51:30 +0000, Joe Beanfish wrote:

> > To go deep
> > use find instead of ls:
> >    find $Dirs -name "*$1" -print;

> OK thanks, I'll need that too - later. Perhaps an alternative
> version. How do people keep their structured-menu of such utilities?
> Trying to remember is anti-computer-usage.

Surprisingly, some of us actually _remember_ these things.

So we don't need "structured menus".

Back to comp.os.linux.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

list but not dirs? Unknown <dog@gmail.com> - 2015-01-27 08:10 +0000
  Re: list but not dirs? Tim Watts <tw_usenet@dionic.net> - 2015-01-27 09:27 +0000
  Re: list but not dirs? Chris Davies <chris-usenet@roaima.co.uk> - 2015-01-27 11:56 +0000
    Re: list but not dirs? Unknown <dog@gmail.com> - 2015-02-03 07:43 +0000
  Re: list but not dirs? Joe Beanfish <joebeanfish@nospam.duh> - 2015-01-28 14:51 +0000
    Re: list but not dirs? Unknown <dog@gmail.com> - 2015-02-03 11:53 +0000
      Re: list but not dirs? Joe Beanfish <joebeanfish@nospam.duh> - 2015-02-03 14:17 +0000
        Re: list but not dirs? Moe Trin <ibuprofin@painkiller.example.tld.invalid> - 2015-02-03 21:56 +0000
      Re: list but not dirs? Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2015-02-03 18:08 +0000

csiph-web