Re: is_<whatever_you_are_testing_for> as method or property?

References	<CABUeae-rNeN_dGgkgauNr+-qChXvkgenBmgLbFioe+JDqiT+Hg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPTjJmojWeyB_bv-6Rjzkno6Cb7NiUKo7rt4Th6fvNPOsGv_jQ@mail.gmail.com> <CABUeae9ukrw8iYan+iFj_6-V7LT0MVm+heVDWv7zEkqEAMim+g@mail.gmail.com>
Date	2014-12-12 22:26 +1100
Subject	Re: is_<whatever_you_are_testing_for> as method or property?
From	Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.16904.1418383605.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 10:21 PM, Mateusz Loskot <mateusz@loskot.net> wrote:
> I've got several cases which are not obvious to me.
> For instance, class Foo has a boolean attribute, read-write,
> which I see a couple of realisations for possible:
>

0) Attribute only.

class Foo:
    pass

Foo().default = True

Unless you need something more than this, go with this style. Much simpler.

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: is_<whatever_you_are_testing_for> as method or property? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-12-12 22:26 +1100

csiph-web