Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #81806
| Date | 2014-12-02 10:06 -0800 |
|---|---|
| From | Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> |
| Subject | Re: Proposed new conditional operator: "or else" |
| References | <C2BEED98-4CCA-4EDE-8FDF-F235B478055C@panix.com> <CAKJDb-NpPbsHgQw5PVtjyK352=zuSBeXJD_+dH5GH3niQDaSOQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.16497.1417543599.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 12/02/2014 09:41 AM, Zachary Ware wrote: > On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Roy Smith wrote: >> >> Wouldn’t it be neat to write: >> >> foo == 42 or else >> >> and have that be an synonym for: >> >> assert foo == 42 > > Never going to happen, but I like it! Perhaps raise IntimidationError > instead of AssertionError when it fails? As long as when raising Intimidation, it also roughs up a couple surrounding lines as a warning to the rest of the code... -- ~Ethan~
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Proposed new conditional operator: "or else" Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-12-02 10:06 -0800
csiph-web