Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #81805
| References | <C2BEED98-4CCA-4EDE-8FDF-F235B478055C@panix.com> |
|---|---|
| From | Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+pylist@gmail.com> |
| Date | 2014-12-02 11:41 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Proposed new conditional operator: "or else" |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.16496.1417542094.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 11:18 AM, Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> wrote: > Wouldn’t it be neat to write: > > foo == 42 or else > > and have that be an synonym for: > > assert foo == 42 > > :-) Never going to happen, but I like it! Perhaps raise IntimidationError instead of AssertionError when it fails? -- Zach
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Proposed new conditional operator: "or else" Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+pylist@gmail.com> - 2014-12-02 11:41 -0600 Re: Proposed new conditional operator: "or else" Andrea D'Amore <anddamNOPSAM+gruppi@brapi.net> - 2014-12-02 22:41 +0100
csiph-web