Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #81588

Re: bug or feature in enum34 py2.7 backport?

References <1b49aa55-ba5f-4e70-8ddb-ae5dea3a40da@googlegroups.com> <1417010748.2940071.195658861.2859C26B@webmail.messagingengine.com> <CAPTjJmo8KbZbk4etqMqvOqrAN6p3J7cQDhdoMPTBysQWfbxOuw@mail.gmail.com> <1417015925.2961473.195688745.6F0FC175@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Date 2014-11-27 02:46 +1100
Subject Re: bug or feature in enum34 py2.7 backport?
From Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.16336.1417016807.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 2:32 AM,  <random832@fastmail.us> wrote:
> But why shouldn't the type constructor do the conversion (and any
> validation of being ASCII-only) when parsing the arguments? The root
> cause seems to be that it parses its arguments with "SO!O!:type"
> (typeobject.c, line 2097). Does anyone know what problems would be
> caused, in general, by having S do a conversion if provided with a
> unicode object?
>
> It seems like if it is a bug to reject long where int is accepted, it
> should be likewise considered a bug to reject ASCII-only unicode where
> str is accepted.

Hmm, that sounds like it would be a feature improvement, rather than a
bug fix. But you could take that up with the release manager.

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

bug or feature in enum34 py2.7 backport? Mark Summerfield <list@qtrac.plus.com> - 2014-11-26 03:29 -0800
  Re: bug or feature in enum34 py2.7 backport? random832@fastmail.us - 2014-11-26 09:05 -0500
  Re: bug or feature in enum34 py2.7 backport? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 01:40 +1100
    Re: bug or feature in enum34 py2.7 backport? Mark Summerfield <list@qtrac.plus.com> - 2014-11-26 07:14 -0800
      Re: bug or feature in enum34 py2.7 backport? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 02:17 +1100
  Re: bug or feature in enum34 py2.7 backport? random832@fastmail.us - 2014-11-26 10:32 -0500
  Re: bug or feature in enum34 py2.7 backport? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-11-27 02:46 +1100
  Re: bug or feature in enum34 py2.7 backport? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-11-26 08:58 -0800
  Re: bug or feature in enum34 py2.7 backport? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-11-26 16:16 -0500

csiph-web