Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #81037
| Date | 2014-11-19 13:14 -0600 |
|---|---|
| Subject | Potential pitfalls when going from old-style to new-style classes |
| From | Skip Montanaro <skip.montanaro@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.15997.1416424509.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
I discussion on the code-quality list got me thinking. Suppose I have
an old-style class in a 2.x app:
class Foo:
def __init__(self):
blah blah blah
I still use 2.x exclusively, but anytime I run pylint over a bit of
code and it complains that Foo is old-school, I make the obvious
change to inherit from object. While I do this mostly to shut up
pylint so I can focus on more serious messages, I must admit I have
never experienced any problem changing from old-style to new-style
classes. Under what circumstances might this be problematic?
Thx,
Skip
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Potential pitfalls when going from old-style to new-style classes Skip Montanaro <skip.montanaro@gmail.com> - 2014-11-19 13:14 -0600
csiph-web