Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #80614
| References | <CAPTjJmpVVfPzwrbeornk9Txyfiz+H5MDfHG2nY_9va7RCUEmEw@mail.gmail.com> <CAPTjJmrhz7crC2_x+ZN9sLgPvd8B1Yn8skzMSTBXJ6gSj55TqQ@mail.gmail.com> <CANc-5UybJQu+QgUrL-kS4XUH5iQHHuWJfaqDu-y00PcvszY5PQ@mail.gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-11-13 04:49 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: __missing__ for the top-level Python script |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.15730.1415814578.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 1:56 AM, Skip Montanaro <skip.montanaro@gmail.com> wrote: > sys.excepthook = autoload_exc > > I can't see a lot of people wanting this (I normally have its import > commented out in my PYTHONSTARTUP file), and I think it would probably > be bad practice for new users of the language. Interesting data point there - that you actually have it handy and choose not to use it. It's clearly designed for interactive mode, as it assumes that it can restart entire blocks of code: >>> for x in (1,2,3): ... print x ... if x==2: print os.pathsep ... 1 2 autoloading os 1 2 : 3 But that's about as good a "now go try this again" as will ever be achieved with sys.excepthook, I expect. ChrisA
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: __missing__ for the top-level Python script Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-11-13 04:49 +1100
csiph-web