Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #80077

Re: Challenge: optimizing isqrt

Show all headers | View raw

On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 7:02 PM, Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> wrote:
> Your above algorithm is obviously doing Heron- or Newton-Raphson iterations,
> so the same as with floating point math. The first line before the while
> loop computes some approximation to sqrt(n). Instead of doing bit shuffling,
> you could compute this by FP math and get closer to the desired result,
> unless the integer is too large to be represented by FP. Now, the
> terminating condition seems to rely on the fact that the initial estimate
> x>=sqrt(n), but I don't really understand it. My guess is that if you do
> x=int(sqrt(n)), then do the first iteration, then swap x and y such that
> x>y, then enter the loop, you would simply start with a better estimate in
> case that the significant bits can be represented by the float.

Part of the point of that algorithm is that it never uses FP, and is
therefore not limited by FP restrictions. As to the assumption that
x>=sqrt(n), that would be safe: if the bit length is even (that is,
it's between an odd power of 2 and an even one - for example, 2**13 <
16000 <= 2**14), the initial estimate is the exact square root of the
power of two at the top of that range (bit length of 14 means x is
2**7, 128 == sqrt(16384)); if the bit length is odd (eg 2**8 < 300 <=
2**9), the initial estimate rounds the halving upward (bit length of 9
means x is 2**(9//2+1), 32 > sqrt(512)). So there's a guarantee that
the initial estimate is no lower than the target number.

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Challenge: optimizing isqrt Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-11-01 12:29 +1100
  Re: Challenge: optimizing isqrt Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-11-01 13:12 +1100
  Re: Challenge: optimizing isqrt Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2014-11-01 09:02 +0100
    Re: Challenge: optimizing isqrt Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2014-11-01 09:09 +0100
    Re: Challenge: optimizing isqrt Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-11-01 19:13 +1100
      Re: Challenge: optimizing isqrt Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2014-11-01 09:25 +0100
        Re: Challenge: optimizing isqrt Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-11-01 19:33 +1100
          Re: Challenge: optimizing isqrt Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2014-11-01 09:38 +0100
            Re: Challenge: optimizing isqrt Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-11-01 19:45 +1100
  Re: Challenge: optimizing isqrt Akira Li <4kir4.1i@gmail.com> - 2014-11-01 12:12 +0300
  Re: Challenge: optimizing isqrt Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> - 2014-11-20 20:00 +0200
  Re: Challenge: optimizing isqrt Stephen Tucker <stephen_tucker@sil.org> - 2014-11-21 08:15 +0000
  Re: Challenge: optimizing isqrt Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2014-11-23 10:43 -0500
  Re: Challenge: optimizing isqrt Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> - 2014-11-25 21:31 +0200
  Re: Challenge: optimizing isqrt Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2014-11-25 19:46 -0500
  Re: Challenge: optimizing isqrt Stephen Tucker <stephen_tucker@sil.org> - 2014-11-26 07:57 +0000
    Re: Challenge: optimizing isqrt Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-11-26 21:25 +1100
  Re: Challenge: optimizing isqrt Serhiy Storchaka <storchaka@gmail.com> - 2014-11-26 18:24 +0200

csiph-web