Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #79442

Re: (-1)**1000

References (1 earlier) <mailman.15058.1413968065.18130.python-list@python.org> <5447786d$0$12750$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <m280ur$aho$1@ger.gmane.org> <091815A9-38E8-4F34-AB03-F9402551DF9F@xs4all.nl> <m282rh$4c6$1@ger.gmane.org>
From Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
Date 2014-10-22 08:23 -0600
Subject Re: (-1)**1000
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.15073.1413987880.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 5:02 AM, Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> wrote:
> Michiel Overtoom wrote:
>
>>
>> On Oct 22, 2014, at 12:29, Peter Otten wrote:
>>
>>> That looks like log(a) while a parity check takes constant time:
>>> $ python3 -m timeit -s 'a = 10**10' 'a & 1'
>>
>>
>> Do you mean 'parity' as in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parity_bit ?
>> Because a parity bit denotes whether the *number* of '1' bits is even or
>> odd, not the value of the least significant bit.
>
> No, I meant the lsb. The OP introduced the term 'parity'; not sure if that
> was erroneous, too, or if there is an angle to the problem that escapes me.

Since the OP just wrote "parity", not "parity bit", I would assume
they meant as in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parity_(mathematics)

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

(-1)**1000 "ast" <nomail@invalid.com> - 2014-10-22 10:27 +0200
  Re: (-1)**1000 Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-10-22 19:54 +1100
    Re: (-1)**1000 "ast" <nomail@invalid.com> - 2014-10-22 11:27 +0200
      Re: (-1)**1000 Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2014-10-22 12:29 +0200
      Re: (-1)**1000 Michiel Overtoom <motoom@xs4all.nl> - 2014-10-22 12:38 +0200
      Re: (-1)**1000 Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2014-10-22 05:43 -0500
      Re: (-1)**1000 Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2014-10-22 13:02 +0200
      Re: (-1)**1000 Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-10-22 08:23 -0600
      Re: (-1)**1000 Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-10-22 08:29 -0600
      Re: (-1)**1000 Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2014-10-22 11:01 -0400
    Re: (-1)**1000 wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2014-10-22 04:35 -0700
  Re: (-1)**1000 Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2014-10-22 11:13 +0200
  Re: (-1)**1000 Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-10-22 13:15 -0400
  Re: (-1)**1000 Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2014-10-24 13:57 -0400
  Re: (-1)**1000 Tony the Tiger <tony@tiger.invalid> - 2014-10-26 20:07 +0000
    Re: (-1)**1000 Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2014-10-26 16:45 -0400
    Re: (-1)**1000 Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2014-10-29 20:31 +0100

csiph-web