Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.hardware > #2611
| From | philo <philo@privacy.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.hardware |
| Subject | Re: Bad Hitachi disk.... how so from a pic? |
| Date | 2014-12-09 17:43 -0600 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <m681f8$kb7$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <XnsA3FB95E38FB30JAX@127.0.0.1> <m62o9n$2nf2$1@saria.nerim.net> <wwv388qze3z.fsf@l1AntVDjLrnP7Td3DQJ8ynzIq3lJMueXf87AxnpFoA.invalid> <m63ulf$lhv$1@dont-email.me> <m680v8$flu$1@dont-email.me> |
On 12/09/2014 05:35 PM, Scott Alfter wrote: > In article <m63ulf$lhv$1@dont-email.me>, > Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> wrote: >> No, not the controller. That which is integrated into the drive are the >> most elementary drive electronics ─ voltage regulators and such ─ which >> is not the same thing as an actual disk controller. For that matter, >> SCSI disks are IDE disks too, and yet they require a separate controller >> ─ whether installed on the motherboard or on a plug-in adapter card. > > There's quite a bit more integration in modern (and many not-so-modern) > drives than you're letting on. There was enough logic built into the drive > that ISA IDE controllers were often little more than some bus transceivers > and a very small amount of glue logic. Consider this one, for instance: > > https://ancientelectronics.files.wordpress.com/2012/11/wang3.jpg > > It's fuzzy, but it looks like the only active components are some 74LS245s > (or '244s?) and a smallish programmable-logic device. The intention with > IDE was to provide a nearly direct connection between the ISA bus and a hard > drive. > > _/_ > / v \ Scott Alfter (remove the obvious to send mail) > (IIGS( https://alfter.us/ Top-posting! > \_^_/ >What's the most annoying thing on Usenet? > That item in the photo is not a true IDE controller, it's one of those "sound card" controllers often used in 486's The very first time I installed Linux (Red Hat 5.2) it was on a 486 that had one of those controllers. I was surprised that it was even supported by Linux. The performance was quite terrible, but I did get a "command line" install functioning. BTW: That drive was so slow that an installation of Win95 that I tried first to install from CD never completed even after running all night. I later installed Win95 from floppies and it wend much faster.
Back to comp.os.linux.hardware | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Bad Hitachi disk.... how so from a pic? Jax <remove.bear.bottoms1@gmail.com> - 2014-12-06 14:44 +0000
Re: Bad Hitachi disk.... how so from a pic? philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2014-12-06 09:44 -0600
Re: Bad Hitachi disk.... how so from a pic? notbob <notbob@nothome.com> - 2014-12-06 19:37 +0000
Re: Bad Hitachi disk.... how so from a pic? philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2014-12-06 14:54 -0600
Re: Bad Hitachi disk.... how so from a pic? Jax <remove.bear.bottoms1@gmail.com> - 2014-12-06 22:50 +0000
Re: Bad Hitachi disk.... how so from a pic? notbob <notbob@nothome.com> - 2014-12-06 23:13 +0000
Re: Bad Hitachi disk.... how so from a pic? philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2014-12-07 04:57 -0600
Re: Bad Hitachi disk.... how so from a pic? Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2014-12-07 16:52 +0100
Re: Bad Hitachi disk.... how so from a pic? philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2014-12-07 09:59 -0600
Re: Bad Hitachi disk.... how so from a pic? Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2014-12-07 17:10 +0100
Re: Bad Hitachi disk.... how so from a pic? philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2014-12-07 10:48 -0600
Re: Bad Hitachi disk.... how so from a pic? Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2014-12-07 18:37 +0100
Re: Bad Hitachi disk.... how so from a pic? philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2014-12-07 12:28 -0600
Re: Bad Hitachi disk.... how so from a pic? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2014-12-07 21:46 +0100
Re: Bad Hitachi disk.... how so from a pic? Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2014-12-07 22:27 +0100
Re: Bad Hitachi disk.... how so from a pic? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2014-12-08 00:36 +0100
Re: Bad Hitachi disk.... how so from a pic? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2014-12-08 09:26 +0000
Re: Bad Hitachi disk.... how so from a pic? Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2014-12-08 11:31 +0100
Re: Bad Hitachi disk.... how so from a pic? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2014-12-08 10:53 +0000
Re: Bad Hitachi disk.... how so from a pic? Aragorn <thorongil@telenet.be.invalid> - 2014-12-08 17:48 +0100
Re: Bad Hitachi disk.... how so from a pic? Richard Kettlewell <rjk@greenend.org.uk> - 2014-12-08 17:28 +0000
Re: Bad Hitachi disk.... how so from a pic? Robert Nichols <SEE_SIGNATURE@localhost.localdomain.invalid> - 2014-12-08 08:43 -0600
Re: Bad Hitachi disk.... how so from a pic? Pascal Hambourg <boite-a-spam@plouf.fr.eu.org> - 2014-12-09 11:02 +0100
Re: Bad Hitachi disk.... how so from a pic? scott@alfter.diespammersdie.us (Scott Alfter) - 2014-12-09 23:35 +0000
Re: Bad Hitachi disk.... how so from a pic? philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2014-12-09 17:43 -0600
Re: Bad Hitachi disk.... how so from a pic? philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2014-12-09 17:54 -0600
Re: Bad Hitachi disk.... how so from a pic? scott@alfter.diespammersdie.us (Scott Alfter) - 2014-12-10 20:22 +0000
Re: Bad Hitachi disk.... how so from a pic? scott@alfter.diespammersdie.us (Scott Alfter) - 2014-12-10 20:27 +0000
Re: Bad Hitachi disk.... how so from a pic? philo <philo@privacy.net> - 2014-12-10 16:40 -0600
Re: Bad Hitachi disk.... how so from a pic? Thomas Richter <thor@math.tu-berlin.de> - 2014-12-10 11:06 +0100
Re: Bad Hitachi disk.... how so from a pic? Baho Utot <baho-utot@invalid.com> - 2014-12-06 13:39 -0500
Re: Bad Hitachi disk.... how so from a pic? Jax <remove.bear.bottoms1@gmail.com> - 2014-12-06 22:51 +0000
Re: Bad Hitachi disk.... how so from a pic? Johnny <johnny@invalid.net> - 2014-12-06 13:02 -0600
Re: Bad Hitachi disk.... how so from a pic? Keith Keller <kkeller-usenet@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> - 2014-12-06 16:04 -0800
csiph-web