Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > news.admin.hierarchies > #2661
| From | Bingo3331 <invalid@invalid.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | news.admin.hierarchies |
| Subject | Re: Proposal for the New Top-Level Hierarchy ai.* - Artificial Intelligence |
| Date | 2025-04-01 17:09 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <m52kuiFi3nnU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <m4u2dvFq8dlU1@mid.individual.net> <wwvzfh1hca5.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk> |
On 31/03/25 09:47, Richard Kettlewell wrote: > >There’s more than a dozen comp.ai groups, completely unused as far as I >can tell. It doesn’t sound like anyone’s particularly interested in >talking about AI on Usenet. > >If you want Italian-language groups then surely something below it.* >would be more appropriate. Thank you for your feedback on our proposal for the `ai.*` hierarchy. Corrado Roberto and I would like to explain why we believe `ai.*` is not only viable but also a valuable addition to Usenet-and why we hope to earn your support. You're absolutely right that there are over a dozen groups under `comp.ai.*`, and many appear dormant. We've observed this too-groups like `comp.ai.neural-nets` or `comp.ai.philosophy` have little to no activity. But we see this as an opportunity, not a dead end. The inactivity doesn't necessarily reflect a lack of interest in AI itself, but rather that these groups, created decades ago, no longer align with today's AI landscape. Modern AI-think ChatGPT, Grok, or image/video generators-has evolved far beyond the scope of those older groups, which focus on niche or outdated topics. `ai.*` aims to refresh this space with a modern, unified hierarchy that reflects current trends and interests. Instead of scattering discussions across fragmented, inactive `comp.ai.*` groups, `ai.*` offers a clear, centralized hub. We're not duplicating effort; we're revitalizing it. Your point about perceived disinterest is valid-Usenet's overall traffic has declined, and AI discussions here are sparse. But we believe this is a chicken-and-egg problem. The lack of active, relevant groups discourages participation. AI is a hot topic globally-on platforms like X, Reddit, and beyond-yet Usenet hasn't kept pace with a dedicated, modern space to capture that enthusiasm. Our proposal for `ai.ita.*` groups (e.g., `ai.ita.chatgpt`, `ai.ita.general`) is a deliberate test: start with the Italian community, which has a strong Usenet presence via `it.*`, and build momentum. We're already planning crossposts and promotional threads to seed activity. If successful, `ai.*` can expand to other languages (e.g., `ai.eng.*`). The inclusion of `ai.ita.stats` will let us track engagement and prove demand-something `comp.ai.*` never had. We're betting that a fresh hierarchy will spark interest where stale ones couldn't. You suggest placing these groups under `it.*`, and it's a fair idea-after all, `it.*` is thriving and Italian-focused. However, we see two key reasons to opt for `ai.*` as a top-level hierarchy: 1. **Thematic Clarity**: `it.*` is a national hierarchy covering everything from `it.comp` to `it.hobby`. Nesting AI groups there (e.g., `it.ai.chatgpt`) risks diluting their focus and visibility. AI is a global, cutting-edge field deserving its own identity, not a subcategory of a catch-all hierarchy. `ai.*` signals to users-Italian or not-that this is *the* place for AI discussions, much like `comp.*` does for computing. 2. **Scalability**: Starting with `ai.ita.*` is just the beginning. A top-level `ai.*` allows future growth-`ai.eng.*` for English speakers, `ai.fr.*` for French, etc.-without being tied to a single language or region. If we limit ourselves to `it.*`, we'd need separate proposals for each language community, fragmenting the effort. `ai.*` offers a unified, forward-thinking structure. -- *Posted from PhoNews Pro for Android V.3.13.3 News.individual.net*
Back to news.admin.hierarchies | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Proposal for the New Top-Level Hierarchy ai.* - Artificial Intelligence Bingo3331 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2025-03-30 23:29 +0000
Re: Proposal for the New Top-Level Hierarchy ai.* - Artificial Intelligence D <J@M> - 2025-03-31 04:15 +0200
Re: Proposal for the New Top-Level Hierarchy ai.* - Artificial Intelligence Bingo3331 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2025-04-01 15:10 +0000
Re: Proposal for the New Top-Level Hierarchy ai.* - Artificial Intelligence D <J@M> - 2025-04-01 18:19 +0200
Re: Proposal for the New Top-Level Hierarchy ai.* - Artificial Intelligence Bingo3331 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2025-04-01 17:41 +0000
Re: Proposal for the New Top-Level Hierarchy ai.* - Artificial Intelligence D <J@M> - 2025-04-02 17:30 +0200
Re: Proposal for the New Top-Level Hierarchy ai.* - Artificial Intelligence Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-03-31 08:47 +0100
Re: Proposal for the New Top-Level Hierarchy ai.* - Artificial Intelligence Bingo3331 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2025-04-01 17:09 +0000
Re: Proposal for the New Top-Level Hierarchy ai.* - Artificial Intelligence Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2025-04-01 19:18 +0100
Re: Proposal for the New Top-Level Hierarchy ai.* - Artificial Intelligence Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2025-03-31 19:42 +0200
Re: Proposal for the New Top-Level Hierarchy ai.* - Artificial Intelligence Bingo3331 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2025-04-01 17:26 +0000
Re: Proposal for the New Top-Level Hierarchy ai.* - Artificial Intelligence Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2025-04-01 20:00 +0200
Re: Proposal for the New Top-Level Hierarchy ai.* - Artificial Intelligence Julien ÉLIE <iulius@nom-de-mon-site.com.invalid> - 2025-04-01 17:38 +0200
Re: Proposal for the New Top-Level Hierarchy ai.* - Artificial Intelligence Bingo3331 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2025-04-01 16:48 +0000
Re: Proposal for the New Top-Level Hierarchy ai.* - Artificial Intelligence Julien ÉLIE <iulius@nom-de-mon-site.com.invalid> - 2025-04-01 21:34 +0200
Re: Proposal for the New Top-Level Hierarchy ai.* - Artificial Intelligence Marco Moock <mm+usenet-es@dorfdsl.de> - 2025-04-02 09:14 +0200
Re: Proposal for the New Top-Level Hierarchy ai.* - Artificial Intelligence Bingo3331 <invalid@invalid.com> - 2025-04-04 17:17 +0000
Re: Proposal for the New Top-Level Hierarchy ai.* - Artificial Intelligence "Adam H. Kerman" <ahk@chinet.com> - 2025-04-04 18:07 +0000
Re: Proposal for the New Top-Level Hierarchy ai.* - Artificial Intelligence David LaRue <huey.dll@tampabay.rr.com> - 2025-08-02 18:17 +0000
Re: Proposal for the New Top-Level Hierarchy ai.* - Artificial Intelligence Chris Jacobs <ctjacobs@ziggo.nl.invalid> - 2025-08-02 20:31 +0200
Re: Proposal for the New Top-Level Hierarchy ai.* - Artificial Intelligence Chris Jacobs <ctjacobs@ziggo.nl.invalid> - 2025-08-02 20:25 +0200
csiph-web