Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.arch.embedded > #18080

Re: Intel Atom: pros/cons/hazzards?

From Don Y <this@is.not.me.com>
Newsgroups sci.electronics.design, comp.arch.embedded
Subject Re: Intel Atom: pros/cons/hazzards?
Date 2014-09-18 03:31 -0700
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Message-ID <lvecfk$b21$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <lvbgac$198$1@dont-email.me> <lvbiof$k55$1@speranza.aioe.org> <lvcvbp$i2o$3@dont-email.me> <lve1oq$eqo$1@speranza.aioe.org> <lve2br$tsq$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 9/18/2014 12:41 AM, rickman wrote:
> On 9/18/2014 3:28 AM, Don Y wrote:
>> On 9/17/2014 2:44 PM, mroberds@att.net wrote:
>>> In sci.electronics.design Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> wrote:
>>
>>> If I remember right, the proprietary graphics driver was closed-source.
>>> It's entirely possible, and (I am not a lawyer and this is not legal
>>> advice) probably within the terms of the GNU GPL, and other open-source
>>> licenses, to have proprietary software running "on top of" an open-
>>> source OS.  It just tends to be a pain in the butt in practice.
>>
>> I don't *think* these have integrated video.  I tried booting
>> a NetBSD system and the video quickly scrambled (hard to see
>> the dmesg output to determine which device was probed at the
>> time).  I'll have to make some time to investigate...
>
> Can't you boot it with the console being another machine over the network?

Even assuming the NIC is recognized and autoconfigured, it doesn't
*appear* that the system is surviving this "scrambled video"
event.

E.g., dmesg appears in red for this kernel.  When the screen goes
wonky, I can see the red text that has been scrolling by (correctly)
up to this point -- amid a scrambled bunch of "white" video
(as if HLock was lost).  The red text stops scrolling -- as if the
next probed item never got added to the output.

I've been busy with a cheesecake, tonight, so not much "free
time" to devote to this problem (beyond the "easy checks")

>>>> Rather, I would like to use them to replace some of the dedicated
>>>> machines that I have here.  E.g., RDBMS server, audio server, etc.
>>>
>>> They will probably work well for that.  If your database is really huge,
>>> it might pay to see if you have one that supports SATA 2, and pair it
>>> with a SATA 2 disk.
>>
>> Database isn't obscene.  It doesn't see many queries but those
>> that it does field tend to be a bit complex (lots of joins, etc.)
>
> Just remember that these CPUs would have been top dog some 10 years ago.
>   So anything that would have been easy for that period hardwware should
> be easy for them now.  Well, maybe not.  I had a VIA CPU which was
> clocked around 1.something GHz and it was a dog.  I replaced it with a
> Celeron later and got better performance.  It had a passive heat sink,
> but the PSU still had a fan.

Some of the boxes I would like to replace are far more capable
(e.g., one is a 2U double dual-core machine with ~12G of RAM...
but, it's much bigger and more capable than I need -- it just
happened to be something "unused" when I pressed it into service)

>>>> And, as "generic" SBC's that I can use in lieu of custom hardware to
>>>> prototype some of my algorithms
>>>
>>> If the test harness isn't completely huge (that is, it doesn't take
>>> forever to build on a desktop box), you can even install gcc on the
>>> target and not have to mess around with cross-compiling, if you want.
>>> I did this when I was messing around with the Atom SBCs.
>>
>> Yes, that's what I've already been doing on the various boxes.
>> Lets me build custom kernels for each box's capabilities, etc.
>>
>> Perhaps next step will be to try a *Windows* install if only to
>> get an enumeration of the various "devices" in the box!  Then,
>> use that information to build an appropriate kernel.
>
> Linux can't do that?

It, perhaps, can.  I just don't run Linux.  And, imagine it
wasn't *designed* with Linux in mind but, rather, "Windows"
(of some flavor).  So, I'd expect putting Windows on it would
"work" -- at least enough to allow me to inspect its hardware
complement.

I'll have to see if I have a smallish 2.5" SATA drive that I
can "waste".  All I've found so far are > 500GB.

Back to comp.arch.embedded | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-17 00:46 -0700
  Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-17 04:05 -0400
    Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? dplatt@coop.radagast.org (David Platt) - 2014-09-17 11:09 -0700
    Re: Intel Atom: pros/cons/hazzards? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2014-09-17 22:52 -0500
  Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? mroberds@att.net - 2014-09-17 08:21 +0000
    Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-17 02:00 -0700
      Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-09-17 13:08 +0200
        Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? JW <none@dev.null> - 2014-09-17 08:24 -0400
      Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? mroberds@att.net - 2014-09-17 21:44 +0000
        Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? dplatt@coop.radagast.org (David Platt) - 2014-09-17 15:04 -0700
        Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-18 00:28 -0700
          Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-18 03:41 -0400
            Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-18 03:31 -0700
              Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-18 18:12 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-18 15:53 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-18 19:22 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-18 17:18 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? josephkk <joseph_barrett@sbcglobal.net> - 2014-09-18 21:16 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-18 21:44 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-09-19 09:19 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-19 01:36 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-09-19 11:53 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-19 03:10 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-09-19 13:02 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-19 04:26 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-09-19 13:50 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-19 10:16 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-09-20 16:42 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-20 12:19 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-09-20 21:58 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-20 13:33 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-09-20 23:00 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-20 16:14 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-09-21 02:12 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-20 20:05 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-09-21 12:45 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-20 16:34 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-20 13:41 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-20 17:29 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2014-09-21 00:12 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-20 19:01 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-20 16:17 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-09-21 02:17 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-20 22:27 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2014-09-21 13:25 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2014-09-21 15:56 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-09-21 18:19 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-09-21 09:37 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-21 14:22 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2014-09-21 23:13 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-21 14:20 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2014-09-21 23:15 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-21 20:20 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-20 16:09 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-20 22:05 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-20 23:25 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-21 03:28 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-21 01:27 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2014-09-21 14:20 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-09-21 13:09 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-21 12:06 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-09-22 09:55 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Dombo <dombo@disposable.invalid> - 2014-09-20 23:54 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-20 15:46 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-20 19:09 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-20 16:29 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-20 22:11 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-20 20:40 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-21 00:56 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-20 23:40 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-21 03:35 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-21 01:47 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-21 07:33 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-21 11:56 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-21 20:32 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2014-09-22 11:03 +1000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-21 18:18 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Clifford Heath <no.spam@please.net> - 2014-09-22 11:53 +1000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-21 19:05 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-21 19:05 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? krw@attt.bizz - 2014-09-21 11:50 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2014-09-21 18:50 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-21 20:09 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Jeff Liebermann <jeffl@cruzio.com> - 2014-09-21 21:25 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-21 22:12 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-09-23 09:38 -0500
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2014-09-22 10:15 +0100
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-22 04:59 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? krw@attt.bizz - 2014-09-22 15:38 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-09-22 10:02 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-22 01:44 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-22 05:25 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-09-22 12:44 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-22 04:33 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2014-09-22 13:00 +0100
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-22 05:02 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-09-22 15:19 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2014-09-22 14:35 +0100
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-22 07:55 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-09-22 17:35 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-22 10:06 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-09-22 10:25 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Hans-Bernhard Bröker <HBBroeker@t-online.de> - 2014-09-22 19:48 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-09-22 20:46 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2014-10-08 12:34 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-10-08 13:10 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-10-08 17:31 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-10-08 14:53 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-10-08 15:06 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Stefan Reuther <stefan.news@arcor.de> - 2014-10-09 19:09 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-10-09 13:44 -0500
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-10-09 22:31 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2014-10-09 17:29 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2014-10-09 17:31 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-10-09 21:25 -0500
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2014-10-09 23:27 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-10-09 21:56 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Stefan Reuther <stefan.news@arcor.de> - 2014-10-10 18:48 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-10-10 10:43 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? mjb@signal11.invalid (Mike) - 2014-10-11 21:25 +0100
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? krw@attt.bizz - 2014-10-10 18:27 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2014-10-11 03:05 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-22 18:43 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-09-22 23:36 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-22 16:48 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-09-23 01:05 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-22 18:47 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-09-23 02:11 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-22 22:24 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-23 00:29 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-09-23 10:07 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom: pros/cons/hazzards? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2014-09-23 07:14 -0500
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-22 23:43 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? krw@attt.bizz - 2014-09-23 13:14 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-09-23 18:18 -0500
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-23 19:28 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? krw@attt.bizz - 2014-09-23 19:58 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-09-23 16:52 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? krw@attt.bizz - 2014-09-23 19:57 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2014-10-08 12:39 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-22 18:38 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-09-22 23:41 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-22 23:27 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-09-23 05:34 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-23 02:21 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-09-24 09:42 -0500
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-09-23 09:51 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-09-23 18:23 -0500
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-09-23 16:53 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-09-24 08:15 -0500
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-09-24 10:52 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-09-24 21:51 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-09-24 15:57 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-09-23 09:52 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-23 18:19 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-09-23 15:33 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-23 18:38 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-09-23 15:59 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-23 19:03 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2014-09-24 00:15 +0100
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-23 19:30 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-09-23 16:56 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-09-24 02:09 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-23 20:17 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-09-23 17:26 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-23 21:20 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-09-23 23:42 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell@earthlink.net> - 2014-10-08 12:41 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2014-09-22 17:03 +0100
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-09-22 10:19 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-22 15:21 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2014-09-22 12:55 +0100
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2014-09-22 12:25 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-22 05:37 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2014-09-22 14:37 +0100
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2014-09-22 14:32 +0100
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-22 07:01 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Tom Gardner <spamjunk@blueyonder.co.uk> - 2014-09-22 15:22 +0100
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-22 08:01 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-23 00:35 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Stef <stef33d@yahooI-N-V-A-L-I-D.com.invalid> - 2014-09-23 09:09 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom: pros/cons/hazzards? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2014-09-23 07:16 -0500
                Re: Intel Atom: pros/cons/hazzards? Andrew Smallshaw <andrews@sdf.lonestar.org> - 2014-09-23 14:45 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-09-23 10:08 -0500
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-09-23 10:03 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-23 13:52 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-09-22 20:53 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-22 15:00 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-09-22 22:14 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-22 15:51 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-09-23 10:17 -0500
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-23 13:57 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-23 18:28 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-22 04:39 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? langwadt@fonz.dk - 2014-09-20 16:33 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-20 22:17 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? langwadt@fonz.dk - 2014-09-21 12:24 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-22 00:00 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Jasen Betts <jasen@xnet.co.nz> - 2014-09-19 23:15 +0000
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-09-19 07:58 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-19 10:41 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-09-19 07:59 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-19 03:08 -0400
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-19 01:17 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? josephkk <joseph_barrett@sbcglobal.net> - 2014-09-19 21:15 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom: pros/cons/hazzards? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2014-09-20 14:36 -0500
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? "Boudewijn Dijkstra" <sp4mtr4p.boudewijn@indes.com> - 2014-09-19 10:02 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-19 04:20 -0400
          Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? "Boudewijn Dijkstra" <sp4mtr4p.boudewijn@indes.com> - 2014-09-18 16:20 +0200
            Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-18 10:25 -0700
              Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? "Boudewijn Dijkstra" <sp4mtr4p.boudewijn@indes.com> - 2014-09-19 09:36 +0200
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-19 01:27 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? josephkk <joseph_barrett@sbcglobal.net> - 2014-09-19 21:35 -0700
                Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-20 11:54 -0700
          Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? mroberds@att.net - 2014-09-18 19:33 +0000
            Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-18 13:18 -0700
          Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Przemek Klosowski <przemek@tux.dot.org> - 2014-09-21 12:34 +0000
            Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? krw@attt.bizz - 2014-09-21 11:54 -0400
    Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? edward.ming.lee@gmail.com - 2014-09-17 08:10 -0700
    Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2014-09-17 15:11 +0000
    Re: Intel Atom: pros/cons/hazzards? Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2014-09-17 22:53 -0500
  Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? DecadentLinuxUserNumeroUno <DLU1@DecadentLinuxUser.org> - 2014-09-17 13:33 -0700
    Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-09-18 03:35 -0500
  Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Allan Herriman <allanherriman@hotmail.com> - 2014-09-18 13:16 +0000
  Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2014-09-25 13:51 +0300
    Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? dplatt@coop.radagast.org (David Platt) - 2014-09-25 09:58 -0700
      Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Anssi Saari <as@sci.fi> - 2014-09-29 21:46 +0300
    Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? Don Y <this@is.not.me.com> - 2014-09-25 10:07 -0700
      Re: Intel Atom:  pros/cons/hazzards? rickman <gnuarm@gmail.com> - 2014-09-25 18:32 -0400
  Re: Intel Atom: pros/cons/hazzards? "Daniel Mandic" <daniel_mandic@hotmail.com> - 2014-10-10 09:53 +0000

csiph-web