Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #684378

Re: Linux 6.13

From vallor <vallor@cultnix.org>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Linux 6.13
Date 2025-01-20 19:06 +0000
Message-ID <lv7l61Fkht9U1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <lv7d06FhfpoU4@mid.individual.net> <lv7dtnFji36U1@mid.individual.net> <181c7676b8880a9a$115946$445945$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <lv7hj9Fji36U2@mid.individual.net> <181c7aa8579b72e5$175359$891815$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 18:40:19 +0000, Farley Flud <fsquared@fsquared.linux>
wrote in <181c7aa8579b72e5$175359$891815$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com>:

> On Mon, 20 Jan 2025 18:05:29 +0000, vallor wrote:
> 
>> PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
>>
> 
> You copied the wrong section:
> 
> config PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
> 	bool "Preemption behaviour defined on boot"
> 	depends on HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC
> 	select JUMP_LABEL if HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC_KEY
> 	select PREEMPT_BUILD
> 	default y if HAVE_PREEMPT_DYNAMIC_CALL
> 	help
> 	  This option allows to define the preemption model on the kernel
> 	  command line parameter and thus override the default preemption
> 	  model defined during compile time.
> 
> ***---->  The feature is primarily interesting for Linux distributions which
> 	  provide a pre-built kernel binary to reduce the number of kernel
> 	  flavors they offer while still offering different usecases.
> 
> 	  The runtime overhead is negligible with HAVE_STATIC_CALL_INLINE enabled
> 	  but if runtime patching is not available for the specific architecture
> 	  then the potential overhead should be considered.
> 
> 	  Interesting if you want the same pre-built kernel should be used for
> 	  both Server and Desktop workloads.

Eh, I'll give you that one, because I had it checked.  Standby on that.

Meanwhile, you *still* haven't posted your uname -a, and you *still*
haven't built the latest Pan, and you *still* haven't posted
your "perfect" C code that uses gmp to compute subfactorials.

(BTW, have you figured out yet why you don't want PREEMPT_LAZY?)

-- 
-v System76 Thelio Mega v1.1 x86_64 NVIDIA RTX 3090 Ti
   OS: Linux 6.13.0 Release: Mint 21.3 Mem: 258G
   "Please Tell Me if you Don't Get This Message"

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Kerne 6.13 Released Farley Flud <fsquared@fsquared.linux> - 2025-01-20 16:21 +0000
  Linux 6.13 (was: Re: Kerne 6.13 Released) vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-20 16:47 +0000
    Re: Linux 6.13 CrudeSausage <crude@sausa.ge> - 2025-01-20 11:51 -0500
    Re: Linux 6.13 vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-20 17:02 +0000
      Re: Linux 6.13 Farley Flud <fsquared@fsquared.linux> - 2025-01-20 17:23 +0000
        Re: Linux 6.13 vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-20 18:05 +0000
          Re: Linux 6.13 Farley Flud <fsquared@fsquared.linux> - 2025-01-20 18:40 +0000
            Re: Linux 6.13 vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-20 19:06 +0000
              Re: Linux 6.13 vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-20 19:26 +0000
                Re: Linux 6.13 Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-01-20 20:57 +0000
                Re: Linux 6.13 vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-20 21:43 +0000
                Re: Linux 6.13 Farley Flud <ff@linux.rocks> - 2025-01-20 21:56 +0000
                Re: Linux 6.13 vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2025-01-21 01:10 +0000

csiph-web