Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Rich <rich@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Damned BIOS |
| Date | 2014-09-02 12:06 +0000 |
| Organization | My Linux Box |
| Message-ID | <lu4bra$o3j$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <c6l1gcFfn34U1@mid.individual.net> <lu3tpd$r7d$1@dont-email.me> <c6lhfuFjpeiU1@mid.individual.net> |
Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote: > On 2/09/2014 6:06 PM, Rich wrote: > > Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> wrote: > >> When I say boot from device X, I mean do that. If it won't work, > >> say so. I don't mean "Have a fair go at X, and if it won't work, > >> then see if you can find some other OS lying around and boot that > >> instead." > > > > Keep in mind, the code about which you complain is from the same > > authors who created this error message from years ago: > > > > Keyboard not found - press F1 key to continue > > > > http://www.jobless-jack.com/2013/07/da-fuck-o-keyboard-not-found.html > > > > Such stupidity does not inspire confidence in their ability to > > determine even a mildly good way to do things, > It did rather encourage hot-plugging the keyboard, which you weren't > strictly speaking meant to do (though I've done it many many times. > Ditto monitors and non-USB mouses). True, although hot plugging a vga cable was never as problematic as hotplugging a ps2 keyboard or mouse could be. > Hard to know for sure what the thinking was. The original BIOS > approach of looking for something bootable probably made sense back > when naive users were expected to install their own OS. It meant the > floppy drive could be the first boot device, so as to allow > installation if it happened to contain a bootable disk. Also, remeber that the "try to boot #1, try to boot #2" method also dates from the early days of the IBM-PC where one could buy the machine with just floppies for $X, or with floppies plus a hard disk for $X+Y. Given the two different, from the manufacturer, configurations, having one single BIOS that attempted a floppy boot first, the went on to the "next" (hard disk) meant the manufacturing costs could be kept down by only needing one single mainboard/BIOS for both configurations. Booting the floppy first, even with a hard disk, also allowed the trend at the time of other software needing its own boot disk (i.e., early games that simply booted themselves from floppies and ignored the hard disk). > I'm invoking a boot-override option. I suspect it's just adding the > chosen device in front of the existing list, with no one having given > thought to the ramifications of that when the chosen device proves > unbootable. True, if you've hit F1/F9/F8 and specifically said "boot device x" by picking it from a menu, then the right thing to do is to try x, and if it fails, don't move on to another device.
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Damned BIOS Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2014-09-02 15:05 +1000
Re: Damned BIOS Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-02 08:06 +0000
Re: Damned BIOS Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2014-09-02 19:38 +1000
Re: Damned BIOS Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-02 12:06 +0000
Re: Damned BIOS Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2014-09-03 12:15 +1000
Re: Damned BIOS Johny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2014-09-02 15:39 +0100
Re: Damned BIOS Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2014-09-03 12:22 +1000
Re: Damned BIOS Scion <a.b@nospam.invalid> - 2014-09-10 10:16 +0000
Re: Damned BIOS Sylvia Else <sylvia@not.at.this.address> - 2014-09-14 15:27 +1000
Re: Damned BIOS Johny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2014-09-14 14:25 +0100
Re: Damned BIOS RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-09-02 18:19 +0000
Re: Damned BIOS polygonum <rmoudndgers@vrod.co.uk> - 2014-09-02 19:52 +0100
Re: Damned BIOS Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-09-02 19:41 +0000
Re: Damned BIOS polygonum <rmoudndgers@vrod.co.uk> - 2014-09-02 21:12 +0100
Re: Damned BIOS Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-09-02 21:00 +0000
Re: Damned BIOS polygonum <rmoudndgers@vrod.co.uk> - 2014-09-02 22:08 +0100
Re: Damned BIOS Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-02 21:14 +0000
Re: Damned BIOS Will Honea <whonea@whonea.net> - 2014-09-02 23:10 -0600
Re: Damned BIOS Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-09-03 05:58 +0000
Re: Damned BIOS Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-09-14 08:26 +0200
Re: Damned BIOS Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-02 21:09 +0000
Re: Damned BIOS Johny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2014-09-02 14:29 +0100
Re: Damned BIOS Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-09-02 16:35 +0200
Re: Damned BIOS Scion <a.b@nospam.invalid> - 2014-09-10 10:18 +0000
Re: Damned BIOS Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-09-10 13:46 +0200
Re: Damned BIOS Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-09-10 13:00 +0000
Re: Damned BIOS Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-09-10 19:28 +0200
Re: Damned BIOS Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-09-10 19:11 +0000
Re: Damned BIOS Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-09-14 08:44 +0200
Re: Damned BIOS Bob Eager <news0002@eager.cx> - 2014-09-14 07:17 +0000
Re: Damned BIOS Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-09-14 08:33 +0200
Re: Damned BIOS Johny B Good <johnny-b-good@invalid.ntlworld.com> - 2014-09-10 13:53 +0100
Re: Damned BIOS Paul Sture <nospam@sture.ch> - 2014-09-14 08:30 +0200
csiph-web