Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Rich <rich@example.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Test |
| Date | 2014-08-16 21:45 +0000 |
| Organization | My Linux Box |
| Message-ID | <lsojdh$tet$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <7ztx5exh2j.fsf@example.com> <1043457021429901244.315208rsw-therandymon.com@news.solani.org> <7ziolsuyox.fsf@example.com> <lsob5u$er3$1@solani.org> <7zegwgus6o.fsf@example.com> |
David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> wrote: > RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> writes: > > On 2014-08-16, David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> wrote: > >> RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> writes: > >> > >>> David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> wrote: > >>>> RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> writes: > >> It's an extremely advanced neural net program. Unfortunately it > >> has no USB interface, so I cannot share it. > > > > Well, I see you're posting from gnus, so you're halfway there. > > Probably just a matter of hacking up a little emacs lisp code and > > choosing a key binding. > No no, my point was, my email address is obviously not valid, but that > doesn't mean I am a bot. I wasn't implying that I was the offending bot. > Anyway, how can you tell that an email address is valid, Without sending the address an email, and verifing that the destination MX server accepted the email, you can't determine validity of an email address. The most you can do short of sending an actual email is determine that the format is allowed by the RFC's. > and what is to stop a bot having a valid email address? Nothing at all.
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Test robot@i-robot.invalid - 2014-08-13 16:33 +0000
Re: Test mm0fmf <none@mailinator.com> - 2014-08-13 19:00 +0100
Re: Test Andy Burns <usenet.feb2014@adslpipe.co.uk> - 2014-08-14 08:08 +0100
Re: Test Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-08-14 07:49 +0000
Re: Test "D.D. (Magic Oddball)" <usenet.xyzzyx@EATspamgourmet.com> - 2014-08-14 04:38 -0700
Re: Test RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-08-15 15:14 +0000
Re: Test RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-08-14 23:19 +0000
Re: Test Andy Burns <usenet.feb2014@adslpipe.co.uk> - 2014-08-15 00:26 +0100
Re: Test David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2014-08-15 10:01 +0100
Re: Test RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-08-16 17:01 +0000
Re: Test David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2014-08-16 18:33 +0100
Re: Test RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-08-16 19:24 +0000
Re: Test David Hume <David.Hume@example.com> - 2014-08-16 20:53 +0100
Re: Test Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-08-16 21:45 +0000
Re: Test RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-08-17 12:53 +0000
Re: Test Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> - 2014-08-15 20:17 +0000
csiph-web