Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.std.c |
| Subject | Re: Description of "." operator |
| Date | 2012-12-08 10:43 -0800 |
| Organization | None to speak of |
| Message-ID | <lnpq2ko04x.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> (permalink) |
| References | <lntxrxnufa.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> |
Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> writes:
> N1570 6.5.2.3p3 says:
>
> A postfix expression followed by the . operator and an identifier
> designates a member of a structure or union object. The value
> is that of the named member, and is an lvalue if the first
> expression is an lvalue.
>
> Consider the use of the word "object" in the first sentence.
>
> An expression of struct type doesn't necessarily refer to an *object* of
> that type. For example:
>
> struct pair { int x; int y; };
> struct pair func(void) {
> struct pair result = { 10, 20 };
> return result;
> }
> ...
> int y = func().y;
>
> And the second quoted sentence seems to explictly acknowledge that the
> left operand needn't refer to an object.
>
> Shouldn't the phrase "a member of a structure or union object" be "a
> member of a structure or union *value*"?
Or, perhaps better, "a member of a structure or union *expression*".
> If not, in the example code above, what object is being referred to?
> ("result" no longer exists after the function returns.)
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Will write code for food.
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"
Back to comp.std.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Description of "." operator Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-12-07 18:34 -0800
Re: Description of "." operator Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-12-08 10:43 -0800
Re: Description of "." operator Jens Gustedt <jens.gustedt@loria.fr> - 2012-12-10 00:35 +0100
Re: Description of "." operator Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-12-09 20:02 -0800
Re: Description of "." operator jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2012-12-09 23:34 +0000
Re: Description of "." operator Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-12-09 20:00 -0800
Re: Description of "." operator Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-12-20 23:32 -0800
Re: Description of "." operator Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-12-21 02:08 -0800
Re: Description of "." operator Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2012-12-21 09:18 -0500
Re: Description of "." operator Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-12-21 08:45 -0800
Re: Description of "." operator Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-12-21 08:37 -0800
Re: Description of "." operator Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2013-01-06 01:23 -0500
Re: Description of "." operator Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2013-01-05 23:51 -0800
Re: Description of "." operator Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2013-01-06 13:49 -0500
Re: Description of "." operator Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2013-01-06 22:12 -0800
Re: Description of "." operator Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2013-01-17 23:19 -0500
Re: Description of "." operator Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2013-01-18 20:47 -0500
Re: Description of "." operator Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2013-01-18 20:14 -0800
Re: Description of "." operator jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2013-01-20 20:07 +0000
Re: Description of "." operator Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2013-01-20 15:36 -0500
csiph-web