Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #3231

Re: Return value for error

Show all headers | View raw

"Kleuskes & Moos" <kleuske@xs4all.nl> writes:
> On May 3, 9:03 pm, Keith Thompson <ks...@mib.org> wrote:
[...]
>> Right.  The important distinction here is that the result of isalpha()
>> is purely a yes/no result, *not* a success/failure result.  If isalpha()
>> could tell you either
>>     Yes, that's an alphabetic character
>> or
>>     No, that's not an alphabetic character
>> or
>>     Oops, I can't tell what that is
>> the it would need a different interface.  In fact, none of the is*()
>> functions have any way to indicate failure.
>
> Perhaps that's got to do with the fact that they cannot actually fail.
> Whatever the input, it's always possible to say wether it codes for an
> letter, a number, upper or lower case character or not.

Well, sort of.  The argument of the is*() function is an int,
but its value is required to be representable as an unsigned char
or to be equal to EOF.  The standard *could* have specified some
kind of error handling for isalpha(UCHAR_MAX + 1), but instead it
just says the behavior is undefined.  Similarly, the behavior of
feof(FILE*(NULL)) is undefined.

The choice was between imposing a small burden on the caller to
avoid passing bad arguments, and making the interface substantially
more inconvenient.

> However, for functions that might actually fail, the consideration is
> actually an important one.

Right.  If you want to have a function that returns a yes/no result,
but the caller can't reliably avoid passing invalid arguments,
you might have it return an error code (zero for success, non-zero
for error) and pass the actual result via an int* argument.

(Languages with exception handling generally don't have this problem.)

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org  <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Nokia
"We must do something.  This is something.  Therefore, we must do this."
    -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Return value for error pozz <pozzugno@gmail.com> - 2011-05-03 01:31 -0700
  Re: Return value for error jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-05-03 10:46 +0200
  Re: Return value for error Ike Naar <ike@otaku.freeshell.org> - 2011-05-03 09:04 +0000
    Re: Return value for error Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-05-03 21:19 +1200
  Re: Return value for error James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-05-03 06:26 -0400
    Re: Return value for error Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-03 12:03 -0700
      Re: Return value for error "Kleuskes & Moos" <kleuske@xs4all.nl> - 2011-05-04 05:15 -0700
        Re: Return value for error Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-04 08:26 -0700
          Re: Return value for error "Kleuskes & Moos" <kleuske@xs4all.nl> - 2011-05-04 17:08 -0700
            Re: Return value for error Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-04 17:54 -0700
              Re: Return value for error "Kleuskes & Moos" <kleuske@xs4all.nl> - 2011-05-05 12:03 -0700
  Re: Return value for error James Dow Allen <jdallen2000@yahoo.com> - 2011-05-03 03:45 -0700
    Re: Return value for error Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2011-05-03 20:50 +0000
  Re: Return value for error pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-05-03 07:50 -0400
    Re: Return value for error Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-03 12:04 -0700
  Re: Return value for error Martin Ambuhl <mambuhl@earthlink.net> - 2011-05-03 07:59 -0400
  Re: Return value for error Mark Storkamp <mstorkamp@yahoo.com> - 2011-05-03 08:46 -0500
  Re: Return value for error Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2011-05-03 10:13 -0500
    Re: Return value for error William Ahern <william@wilbur.25thandClement.com> - 2011-05-03 13:08 -0700
  Re: Return value for error Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2011-05-03 13:23 -0400
    Re: Return value for error Peter Nilsson <airia@acay.com.au> - 2011-05-03 16:01 -0700
    Re: Return value for error Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-05-05 07:21 +0100
      Re: Return value for error Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2011-05-05 15:13 +0100
        Re: Return value for error Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-05-06 03:51 +0100
          Re: Return value for error James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-05-05 23:38 -0400
      Re: Return value for error Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-05 08:44 -0700
        Re: Return value for error Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-05-05 20:49 +0000
          Re: Return value for error Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-05 14:10 -0700
            Re: Return value for error Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-05-06 00:26 +0000
  Re: Return value for error Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-03 12:09 -0700

csiph-web