Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #8018

Re: fopen

Show all headers | View raw

China Blue Dolls <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> writes:
> In article <lnvcvcy0ao.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org>, Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> 
> wrote:
>> China Blue Dolls <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> writes:
>> > In article <slrnj1ea1m.25s3.usenet-nospam@guild.seebs.net>,
>> >  Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> wrote:
>> >> On 2011-07-08, China Blue Dolls <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> >> > In article <slrnj1e553.21o0.usenet-nospam@guild.seebs.net>,
>> >> >  Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> wrote:
>> >> >> In general, C implementations will do a reasonable job of
>> >> >> implementing fopen() sensibly.
>> >> 
>> >> > That would explain why so many people have replaced it.
>> >> 
>> >> How many are those?  I'm not sure I've ever seen a replacement of
>> >> fopen() outside of newbie code.
>> >
>> > Here's one: http://tcl.sourceforge.net/
>> > Possibly another: http://www.python.org/download/source/
>> [...]
>> 
>> Those are languages other than C.  If those the best examples you
>> have, I don't think you're supporting your point very well.
>
> What language is the Tcl library written in?

As far as I can tell, most of the library appears to be written
in Tcl.  The language implementation appears to be in C.

Are you trying to make some point about C code that uses some kind
of replacement for fopen() rather than using fopen() itself?  If so,
please be more specific.  Posting the URLs for two large source
trees that may or may not contain something relevant is not helpful.

On the other hand, if you don't *want* to make your point clearly,
that's fine with me.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org  <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Nokia
"We must do something.  This is something.  Therefore, we must do this."
    -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

fopen jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2011-07-08 12:59 +0200
  Re: fopen Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-08 23:06 +1200
    Re: fopen China Blue Dolls <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-08 04:40 -0700
      Re: fopen Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-08 23:46 +1200
        Re: fopen China Blue Dolls <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-08 05:15 -0700
          Re: fopen Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-07-08 14:47 +0000
            Re: fopen China Blue Dolls <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-08 08:18 -0700
            Re: fopen Angel <angel+news@spamcop.net> - 2011-07-08 19:37 +0000
              Re: fopen China Blue Dolls <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-08 13:02 -0700
      Re: fopen Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-07-08 14:47 +0000
        Re: fopen China Blue Dolls <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-08 08:29 -0700
          Re: fopen Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-07-08 15:55 +0000
            Re: fopen China Blue Dolls <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-08 09:19 -0700
              Re: fopen Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-07-08 17:21 +0000
              Re: fopen Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-07-08 13:39 -0700
                Re: fopen China Blue Dolls <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-08 17:17 -0700
                Re: fopen Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-07-08 17:39 -0700
                Re: fopen Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-07-09 06:04 +0000
                Re: fopen China Blue Dolls <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-09 01:39 -0700
          Re: fopen Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-09 08:23 +1200
          Re: fopen Dr Nick <3-nospam@temporary-address.org.uk> - 2011-07-09 07:47 +0100
          Re: fopen Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-07-09 06:55 -0700
            Re: fopen Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-07-10 05:26 +0100
              Re: fopen Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2011-07-10 02:33 -0700
    Re: fopen James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-07-08 08:18 -0400
      Re: fopen Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-09 08:18 +1200
      Re: fopen Dr Nick <3-nospam@temporary-address.org.uk> - 2011-07-09 07:52 +0100
  Re: fopen Todd Carnes <toddcarnes@gmail.com> - 2011-07-08 13:10 +0000
    Re: fopen BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-07-08 12:25 -0700

csiph-web