Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: variadic function |
| Date | 2012-01-25 02:54 -0800 |
| Organization | None to speak of |
| Message-ID | <lnmx9c59x8.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> (permalink) |
| References | <j94dhl$6ua$1@speranza.aioe.org> <offdb75p2fm1j8vn65l6e0kvum4oik7v4t@4ax.com> <lnaa89dory.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> <kfnty3k9rdd.fsf@x-alumni2.alumni.caltech.edu> |
Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
> Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> writes:
>
>> [snip]
>>
>> If the standard did have the requirement you mention: "Do not call
>> va_end after va_start unless va_arg has been called to process
>> every argument in the calling sequence", what great inconvenience
>> would it cause?
>
> The problem is it requires us to know things that we may
> not know, namely, the number and types of arguments remaining.
> Even if a motivating example isn't immediately obvious, that's
> a chilling prospect.
The quoted discussion was a while ago, but I think what I had in mind is
that calling va_end "too soon" would have undefined behavior. For
example (assuming printf uses the <stdarg.h> mechanism), this:
printf("%s\n", "arg1", "ignored");
has well defined behavior; with the hypothetical rule, its behavior
would be undefined. If the language were changed in this way, no
implementations would have to change; the existing behavior would still
be conforming.
I do not advocate such a change; I was merely speculating on the
consequences if the language had been defined that way from the
beginning (or at least from 1989). As I wrote before, passing excess
arguments to a variadic function is almost certainly a programming
error; making such a call's behavior undefined would not be a great
burden.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Will write code for food.
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
variadic function Quentin Pope <qp19433@hotmail.NOSPAM.com> - 2011-11-05 22:32 +0000
Re: variadic function Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-11-05 15:50 -0700
Re: variadic function Quentin Pope <qp19433@hotmail.NOSPAM.com> - 2011-11-07 17:41 +0000
Re: variadic function James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-11-05 18:53 -0400
Re: variadic function Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-11-05 16:35 -0700
Re: variadic function Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2011-11-06 01:36 +0000
Re: variadic function Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2011-11-06 01:31 +0000
Re: variadic function Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2011-11-06 09:45 -0800
Re: variadic function Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-11-06 11:38 -0800
Re: variadic function Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-01-24 23:24 -0800
Re: variadic function Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-01-25 02:54 -0800
Re: variadic function Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-01-31 18:22 -0800
Re: variadic function Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-01-31 21:50 -0800
Re: variadic function James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-02-01 07:55 -0500
Re: variadic function Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-02-01 08:06 -0500
Re: variadic function Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-02-01 11:42 -0800
Re: variadic function Willem <willem@toad.stack.nl> - 2012-02-01 16:15 +0000
Re: variadic function Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-02-01 11:41 -0800
Re: variadic function Shao Miller <sha0.miller@gmail.com> - 2012-02-01 13:41 -0500
Re: variadic function blp@cs.stanford.edu (Ben Pfaff) - 2012-02-01 10:45 -0800
Re: variadic function Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-03-08 10:30 -0800
Re: variadic function Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-03-08 13:57 -0800
Re: variadic function Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-03-09 13:10 -0800
Re: variadic function jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2012-03-11 07:56 +0000
Re: variadic function Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-03-11 13:01 -0700
Re: variadic function jgk@panix.com (Joe keane) - 2012-03-12 19:04 +0000
Re: variadic function Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-03-13 15:05 -0700
csiph-web