Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #16773

Re: Comparing C11 compilers

Show all headers | View raw

bartek szurgot <basz@no.spam> writes:
> On 02/06/2012 06:48 PM, Quentin Pope wrote:
[...]
>> Which C11 compilers are people here using? Have you had any problems with 
>> the new features? Does anyone have information on vendors' plans (esp gcc, 
>> Intel)?
>
> i had been experimenting with 3 compilers for C++11 (sorry - they are
> still C++0x ;)). it looks like this:
> 1. GCC - most major features are there. many small things are missing
> though (list of features can be found on GCC's site). bugs still happen too.
> 2. Visual (Microsoft) - i'd say that less than a half of what GCC supports.
> 3. ICC (Intel's) - very limited (basic) support.

The question was about C11, not C++11.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org  <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
    Will write code for food.
"We must do something.  This is something.  Therefore, we must do this."
    -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Comparing C11 compilers Quentin Pope <qp19433@hotmail.NOSPAM.com> - 2012-02-06 17:48 +0000
  Re: Comparing C11 compilers Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu> - 2012-02-06 09:50 -0800
  Re: Comparing C11 compilers bartek szurgot <basz@no.spam> - 2012-02-06 20:29 +0100
    Re: Comparing C11 compilers Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-02-06 11:59 -0800
      Re: Comparing C11 compilers bartek szurgot <basz@no.spam> - 2012-02-08 16:29 +0100
  Re: Comparing C11 compilers Rui Maciel <rui.maciel@gmail.com> - 2012-02-06 21:36 +0000

csiph-web