Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c > #43467

[OT] Killfiles (was Re: const or constant?)

Show all headers | View raw

[This post is off-topic.  Feel free to skip if you're not interested]

jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> writes:
> Le 23/04/2014 17:40, Keith Thompson a écrit :
>> the person
>> making the suggestion is in my killfile
>
> At each of the threads I start, Kiki will repeat the same lie.
>
> What is  the purpose of his killfile if he participates to all the
> threads I start?
>
> BINGO!
>
> To repeat that I am in his killfile of course!
>
> I could forget that important fact.
>
> Thanks kiki

jacob, this is the first time I've responded to you here in several
years, and I expect it to be the last time for long while.  If you
wish to discuss anything with me, you can e-mail me; it's likely
I'll reply.

You appear to have misunderstood a few things.

I've chosen to respond just this once because your obsession
with me appears to be unabated, and perhaps I can clear up some
misconceptions.

Yes, you are in my killfile.  Strictly speaking, it's a scorefile,
the mechanism that my newsreader uses for the same purpose.
That doesn't necessarily mean I never read anything you post.
Whether I do so or not, and the circumstances in which I do so,
are not things I care to discuss at the moment.  Obviously I happen
to have read your above-quoted post.

My killfile/scorefile applies to your posts, not to all posts in
threads that you happen to start.  I feel free to participate in any
such threads or not, as I choose, regardless of who started them.
My reply was to a post by Ben Bacarisse, in which he mentioned
something that you had proposed.  I mentioned in passing that you
are in my killfile to explain why I was unfamiliar with the details
of what you had proposed.

I had no particular intention of reminding you that you're in
my killfile.  The purpose of my followup to Ben was to make
a technical point about something he said (that happened to be
related to something you had proposed).  I wasn't talking to you.

You may or may not post a followup to this.  I may or may not
read it.  Do not expect any further reply.

Everyone else: Sorry if I've wasted your time with this.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org  <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc.
"We must do something.  This is something.  Therefore, we must do this."
    -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

const or constant? jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2014-04-22 18:58 +0200
  Re: const or constant? "Bill Cunningham" <nospam@nspam.invalid> - 2014-04-22 14:13 -0400
    Re: const or constant? Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2014-04-22 15:59 -0700
  Re: const or constant? jt@toerring.de (Jens Thoms Toerring) - 2014-04-22 21:26 +0000
    Re: const or constant? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-04-22 17:56 -0400
      Re: const or constant? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2014-04-22 15:32 -0700
        Re: const or constant? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-04-23 08:57 -0400
          Re: const or constant? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-04-23 15:27 +0200
            Re: const or constant? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2014-04-23 08:34 -0700
              Re: const or constant? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-04-24 08:50 +0200
                Re: const or constant? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-04-24 07:58 -0400
                Re: const or constant? David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2014-04-24 14:19 +0200
                Re: const or constant? glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-04-24 21:40 +0000
                Re: const or constant? Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2014-04-25 01:05 -0700
          Re: const or constant? "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-04-23 21:38 +0100
      Re: const or constant? jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2014-04-23 00:51 +0200
    Re: const or constant? jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2014-04-23 00:47 +0200
  Re: const or constant? Walter Banks <walter@bytecraft.com> - 2014-04-22 18:00 -0400
  Re: const or constant? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-04-22 23:12 +0100
    Re: const or constant? jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2014-04-23 01:00 +0200
      Re: const or constant? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-04-23 14:48 +0100
        Re: const or constant? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2014-04-23 08:40 -0700
          Re: const or constant? jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2014-04-23 21:49 +0200
            Re: const or constant? Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-04-23 20:11 +0000
            [OT] Killfiles (was Re: const or constant?) Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2014-04-23 14:49 -0700
              Re: [OT] Killfiles (was Re: const or constant?) Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2014-04-23 22:22 -0700
    Re: const or constant? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-04-23 09:09 -0400
  Re: const or constant? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2014-04-24 09:35 +1200
    Re: const or constant? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2014-04-24 10:06 +1200
      Re: const or constant? Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2014-04-24 10:52 +1200

csiph-web