Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Pointers and Sequence Point |
| Date | 2011-05-02 23:26 -0700 |
| Organization | None to speak of |
| Message-ID | <lnei4guwog.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> (permalink) |
| References | <4dbe97cd$0$311$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <ipmdaj$8dk$1@dont-email.me> <77ea7b06-dc58-48b0-bd17-4797d4150058@22g2000prx.googlegroups.com> <ipnsam$bv2$1@dont-email.me> |
James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> writes:
> On 05/02/2011 12:36 PM, Chad wrote:
>> On May 2, 6:58�am, Martin Ambuhl <mamb...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>> On 5/2/2011 7:38 AM, arnuld wrote:
>>>
>>>> I have this program which is causing confusion to me. I am told that last
>>>> printf() of main() will always print "Second", not "First". I think line:
>>>
>>>> � x = myAlloc(x);
>>>
>>> While it is possible to write evil code in which myAlloc could modify x,
>>> in C myAlloc receives a copy of the value of x and has no clue where x
>>> is or how to modify it. �There are not two or more instances of
>>> modifying x between sequence points.
>>>
>>
>> What is the scope of 'x' in myAlloc(x)? Is confined to myAlloc()?
>
> The scope of 'x' starts at the declaration of 'x' on the first line of
> main(), and is restricted to the body of main(). It goes out of scope
> throughout the execution of myAlloc(). It comes back into scope after
> that function returns. It's scope ends when main() returns.
Your wording seems to imply that 'x' goes into and out of scope
during execution. In fact, an entity's scope is a region of
program text. C99 6.2.1p2.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Nokia
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Pointers and Sequence Point arnuld <sunrise@invalid.address> - 2011-05-02 11:38 +0000
Re: Pointers and Sequence Point James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-05-02 08:23 -0400
Re: Pointers and Sequence Point Martin Ambuhl <mambuhl@earthlink.net> - 2011-05-02 09:58 -0400
Re: Pointers and Sequence Point Chad <cdalten@gmail.com> - 2011-05-02 09:36 -0700
Re: Pointers and Sequence Point Angel <angel+news@spamcop.net> - 2011-05-02 17:21 +0000
Re: Pointers and Sequence Point James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-05-02 23:20 -0400
Re: Pointers and Sequence Point Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-05-02 23:26 -0700
Re: Pointers and Sequence Point James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-05-03 05:33 -0400
Re: Pointers and Sequence Point Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2011-05-02 13:35 -0400
Re: Pointers and Sequence Point Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2011-05-03 17:45 +0300
Re: Pointers and Sequence Point John Bode <jfbode1029@gmail.com> - 2011-05-02 10:17 -0700
Re: Pointers and Sequence Point Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2011-05-02 10:31 -0700
Re: Pointers and Sequence Point "Morris Keesan" <mkeesan@post.harvard.edu> - 2011-05-02 20:55 -0400
Re: Pointers and Sequence Point David Resnick <lndresnick@gmail.com> - 2011-05-03 08:01 -0700
csiph-web