Re: complex number in struct form in C

From	Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c
Subject	Re: complex number in struct form in C
Date	2014-12-21 12:37 -0800
Organization	None to speak of
Message-ID	<lnd27c91u2.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> (permalink)
References	<bb5abeac-08cd-43de-a54a-5efd27423d80@googlegroups.com> <m76sib$3i6$1@dont-email.me> <8a62bd37-0803-47ec-b52b-20e802f34f03@googlegroups.com> <cfoc9cFtn8mU1@mid.individual.net> <m76uab$bi7$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> writes:
> On 12/21/2014 11:54 AM, Osmium wrote:
> ...
>> The convention in C, is for real numbers to be represented by double, not 
>> float.  Look at the types of parameters and such in <math.h>
>
> Just about every function in <math.h> or <cmath.h> that has a 'double'
> argument or a 'double' return value has a corresponding function with
> 'f' at the end of the name that takes float arguments or returns float
> values, and another corresponding function with 'l' at the end that
> takes 'long double' arguments or returns a 'long double' value. I don't
> think you can justify the conclusion you're reaching from that evidence.

The *f() and *l() functions were added in C99.  In C90 and earlier,
<math.h> only had functions that operate on double.  Even in C99 and
later, the functions with the most straightforward names operate on
double.  Unsuffixed floating-point literals are of type double.
Arguments of type float are promoted to double when passed to variadic
functions.

The convention is not stated explicitly in the standard, but in my
experience the common wisdom is that floating-point calculations should
*usually* be done using type double, with long double used when extra
range or precision is needed and float used to save space.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org  <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Working, but not speaking, for JetHead Development, Inc.
"We must do something.  This is something.  Therefore, we must do this."
    -- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"

Thread

complex number in struct form in C Dexterr <dejangru@gmail.com> - 2014-12-21 07:20 -0800
  Re: complex number in struct form in C James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-12-21 11:30 -0500
    Re: complex number in struct form in C Dexterr <dejangru@gmail.com> - 2014-12-21 08:35 -0800
      Re: complex number in struct form in C "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2014-12-21 10:54 -0600
        Re: complex number in struct form in C James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-12-21 12:00 -0500
          Re: complex number in struct form in C "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2014-12-21 11:08 -0600
            Re: complex number in struct form in C Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@dqel.com> - 2014-12-21 10:12 -0800
              Re: complex number in struct form in C "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2014-12-21 13:22 -0600
                Re: complex number in struct form in C Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-12-21 22:21 +0000
              Re: complex number in struct form in C asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2014-12-26 11:34 -0800
                Re: complex number in struct form in C "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2014-12-26 14:10 -0600
                Re: complex number in struct form in C glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-12-28 07:04 +0000
                Re: complex number in struct form in C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-12-28 13:14 +0000
                Re: complex number in struct form in C Robert Wessel <robertwessel2@yahoo.com> - 2014-12-28 10:45 -0600
                Re: complex number in struct form in C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2014-12-28 08:56 -0800
                Re: complex number in struct form in C glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-12-29 10:10 +0000
                Re: complex number in struct form in C Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-12-29 19:40 +0000
                Re: complex number in struct form in C glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-12-29 20:54 +0000
                Re: complex number in struct form in C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-12-29 21:55 +0000
                Re: complex number in struct form in C glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-12-30 03:07 +0000
                Re: complex number in struct form in C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-12-30 10:51 +0000
                Re: complex number in struct form in C Rosario193 <Rosario@invalid.invalid> - 2014-12-30 12:15 +0100
                Re: complex number in struct form in C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2014-12-30 03:31 -0800
                Re: complex number in struct form in C Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-12-30 12:17 +0000
                Re: complex number in struct form in C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-12-30 13:18 +0000
                Re: complex number in struct form in C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2014-12-30 05:28 -0800
                Re: complex number in struct form in C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-12-30 13:53 +0000
                Re: complex number in struct form in C "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2014-12-30 08:53 -0600
                Re: complex number in struct form in C "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> - 2014-12-30 20:05 -0800
                Re: complex number in struct form in C Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2014-12-30 17:40 -0500
                Re: complex number in struct form in C Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2015-03-24 08:58 -0700
                Re: complex number in struct form in C Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2015-03-24 19:41 -0500
                Re: complex number in struct form in C Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-12-30 14:59 +0000
                Re: complex number in struct form in C David Thompson <dave.thompson2@verizon.net> - 2015-01-12 15:33 -0500
                Re: complex number in struct form in C glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2015-01-12 22:51 +0000
                Re: complex number in struct form in C Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2015-01-12 23:34 +0000
                Re: complex number in struct form in C James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-12-26 15:25 -0500
                Re: complex number in struct form in C glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-12-28 07:17 +0000
                Re: complex number in struct form in C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-12-26 20:49 +0000
                Re: complex number in struct form in C asetofsymbols@gmail.com - 2014-12-27 00:22 -0800
                Re: complex number in struct form in C "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2014-12-27 08:25 -0600
                Re: complex number in struct form in C Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2014-12-27 10:20 -0800
                Re: complex number in struct form in C "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2014-12-27 13:21 -0600
                Re: complex number in struct form in C Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2014-12-27 13:11 -0800
                Re: complex number in struct form in C "Osmium" <r124c4u102@comcast.net> - 2014-12-27 15:36 -0600
                Re: complex number in struct form in C Geoff <geoff@invalid.invalid> - 2014-12-27 14:54 -0800
                Re: complex number in struct form in C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2014-12-27 15:45 -0800
                Re: complex number in struct form in C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2014-12-27 13:40 -0800
                Re: complex number in struct form in C James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-12-28 06:50 -0500
                Re: complex number in struct form in C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2014-12-28 04:25 -0800
                Re: complex number in struct form in C James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-12-28 06:44 -0500
                Re: complex number in struct form in C Richard Damon <Richard@Damon-Family.org> - 2014-12-28 08:33 -0500
                Re: complex number in struct form in C James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-12-27 11:46 -0500
                Re: complex number in struct form in C glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-12-28 07:28 +0000
                Re: complex number in struct form in C Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-12-27 17:23 +0000
            Re: complex number in struct form in C James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-12-21 14:37 -0500
          Re: complex number in struct form in C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2014-12-21 12:37 -0800
          Re: complex number in struct form in C glen herrmannsfeldt <gah@ugcs.caltech.edu> - 2014-12-22 00:54 +0000
      Re: complex number in struct form in C James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2014-12-21 11:54 -0500
      Re: complex number in struct form in C Vincenzo Mercuri <nomail@yahoo.it> - 2014-12-21 18:07 +0100
        Re: complex number in struct form in C Dexterr <dejangru@gmail.com> - 2014-12-21 10:37 -0800
          Re: complex number in struct form in C "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> - 2014-12-21 10:55 -0800
          Re: complex number in struct form in C raltbos@xs4all.nl (Richard Bos) - 2014-12-22 12:15 +0000
            Re: complex number in struct form in C Dexterr <dejangru@gmail.com> - 2014-12-22 05:51 -0800
              Re: complex number in struct form in C BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-12-22 14:01 +0000
                Re: complex number in struct form in C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2014-12-22 08:02 -0800
            Re: complex number in struct form in C Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2014-12-22 08:03 -0800
    Re: complex number in struct form in C Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2014-12-21 22:27 +0000
  Re: complex number in struct form in C "Chris M. Thomasson" <no@spam.invalid> - 2014-12-21 10:51 -0800
    Re: complex number in struct form in C Dexterr <dejangru@gmail.com> - 2014-12-21 11:14 -0800
  Re: complex number in struct form in C Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2014-12-21 17:17 -0800

csiph-web