Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Variable argument function as a parameter of a variable argument function |
| Date | 2011-11-20 15:58 -0800 |
| Organization | None to speak of |
| Message-ID | <lnaa7qwdm2.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> (permalink) |
| References | <00f0752d-f768-437a-87c5-0b3767c7411f@l24g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <4EC94804.4E9F@mindspring.com> <e6730a8e-3cb9-49a5-aaaa-c7a36945474d@o1g2000vbe.googlegroups.com> |
AikidoGuy <aikidoguy@gmail.com> writes:
> Indeed, FAQ 15.12 was not my question... but Pete's response has
> confirmed that my original question is possible. I was also
> considering to construct such an example, but with a new child, it is
> difficult to find time. Thanks for your help Pete!
>
> The motivation behind the original question was because my code was
> not working as expected and I thought that it might be due to the fact
> that maybe a variadic function inside another variadic function could
> be the cause of my problem. I thought to myself that perhaps a
> compiler could get confused (somehow extract the wrong elements off
> the stack for the internal variadic function ...). I see that my
> thoughts were incorrect. So, I have looked again at my code that
> prompted my original question and I found that I had a subtle bug in
> there... oops :(
>
> Thanks everyone for your answers and suggestions! Much appreciated :)
You've illustrated why it's a good idea to ask about the actual problem
you're having, rather than making an assumption about what caused the
problem and asking about that.
It's known as an "XY problem": "You want to do X, and you think Y is the
best way of doing so. Instead of asking about X, you ask about Y."
<http://www.perlmonks.org/?node_id=542341>
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Variable argument function as a parameter of a variable argument function AikidoGuy <aikidoguy@gmail.com> - 2011-11-19 23:02 -0800
Re: Variable argument function as a parameter of a variable argument function Ark <akhasin@macroexpressions.com> - 2011-11-20 03:14 -0500
Re: Variable argument function as a parameter of a variable argument function Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-11-20 08:07 -0500
Re: Variable argument function as a parameter of a variable argument function Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-11-20 08:11 -0500
Re: Variable argument function as a parameter of a variable argument function Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-11-20 08:19 -0800
Re: Variable argument function as a parameter of a variable argument function pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2011-11-20 13:33 -0500
Re: Variable argument function as a parameter of a variable argument function AikidoGuy <aikidoguy@gmail.com> - 2011-11-20 15:29 -0800
Re: Variable argument function as a parameter of a variable argument function Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2011-11-20 15:58 -0800
Re: Variable argument function as a parameter of a variable argument function AikidoGuy <aikidoguy@gmail.com> - 2011-11-20 16:05 -0800
Re: Variable argument function as a parameter of a variable argument function James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-11-20 20:45 -0500
Re: Variable argument function as a parameter of a variable argument function AikidoGuy <aikidoguy@gmail.com> - 2011-11-20 20:18 -0800
Re: Variable argument function as a parameter of a variable argument function James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2011-11-21 07:22 -0500
Re: Variable argument function as a parameter of a variable argument function Seebs <usenet-nospam@seebs.net> - 2011-11-21 22:43 +0000
csiph-web