Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Params -> local vars? |
| Date | 2012-09-07 17:55 -0700 |
| Organization | None to speak of |
| Message-ID | <lna9x1s583.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> (permalink) |
| References | <jv6nmr$15k$1@speranza.aioe.org> <kfn8vclh8j4.fsf@x-alumni2.alumni.caltech.edu> |
Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
[...]
> 3. The prototype style of parameter declaration allows (and requires)
> any call after the prototype declaration to have the types of its
> arguments checked against the parameter types given in the prototype.
> In contrast, the old style of parameter declaration does not do
> such type checking (and the Standard says specifically that such
> type checking will not be done).
[...]
Checking is not *required*, but an implementation is free to perform it
anyway.
For example:
void func(arg)
int arg;
{
/* ... */
}
...
func("foo");
The call has undefined behavior. No diagnostic is required (and I
don't think I've seen a compiler warn about this), but (a) compilers
are free to warn about anything they like, and (b) given undefined
behavior that's detectable at compile time, a compiler is free to
treat it as a fatal error.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Will write code for food.
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Params -> local vars? Jon Howson <nospam@nospam.com> - 2012-07-30 19:35 +0000
Re: Params -> local vars? Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-07-30 15:54 -0400
Re: Params -> local vars? James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2012-07-30 16:00 -0400
Re: Params -> local vars? Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2012-07-30 16:01 -0400
Re: Params -> local vars? Stephen Sprunk <stephen@sprunk.org> - 2012-07-30 15:09 -0500
Re: Params -> local vars? Mark Bluemel <mark_bluemel@pobox.com> - 2012-07-31 08:34 +0100
Re: Params -> local vars? Kleuske <kleuske@nowhere.net> - 2012-07-31 19:29 +0000
Re: Params -> local vars? Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-07-31 15:51 -0400
Re: Params -> local vars? Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2012-08-01 15:58 -0400
Re: Params -> local vars? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-07-30 13:49 -0700
Re: Params -> local vars? Joe Pfeiffer <pfeiffer@cs.nmsu.edu> - 2012-07-30 21:56 -0600
Re: Params -> local vars? David T. Ashley <dashley@gmail.com> - 2012-07-31 08:42 -0400
Re: Params -> local vars? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-09-07 13:39 -0700
Re: Params -> local vars? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-09-07 17:55 -0700
Re: Params -> local vars? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-09-08 05:09 -0700
Re: Params -> local vars? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-09-08 11:14 -0700
Re: Params -> local vars? Richard Damon <news.x.richarddamon@xoxy.net> - 2012-09-08 16:43 -0400
Re: Params -> local vars? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-12-17 14:13 -0800
csiph-web