Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ? |
| Date | 2012-07-20 20:25 -0700 |
| Organization | None to speak of |
| Message-ID | <ln7gtxaj7r.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> (permalink) |
| References | <jubm08$k38$1@news.httrack.net> <return-20120720172117@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <lnobna9y00.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> <5009F7F6.C47@mindspring.com> |
pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> writes:
> Keith Thompson wrote:
>> ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de (Stefan Ram) writes:
>> > Xavier Roche <xroche@free.fr.NOSPAM.invalid> writes:
>> >>Is there a C standard expert who can confirm what shall return
>> >>0.0 ? 1 : 0
>> >
>> > An expression does not return. A function may return. After
>> >
>> > int f(){ return 0.0 ? 1 : 0; {
>> >
>> > , we can say that f »shall return 0.0 ? 1 : 0«.
>>
>> An expression *yields* a value. (I think earlier versions of the
>> standard used the word "return" for the results of expressions in
>> some places; as far as I know it's been cleaned up.)
>
> Section "6.5 Expressions" in both C89 and in C99,
> described the bitwise operators as returning values.
C99 says they "return" values; N1256 says they "yield" values,
as does N1570 (the C11 pre-release draft).
None of the three Technical Corrigenda (which in theory constitute
the difference between C99 and N1256) contain the word "yield".
I think the editor, Larry Jones, just made the change himself.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Will write code for food.
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ? Xavier Roche <xroche@free.fr.NOSPAM.invalid> - 2012-07-20 15:21 +0200
Re: What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-07-20 14:57 +0100
Re: What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-07-21 14:39 -0700
Re: What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ? Ralf Damaschke <rwspam@gmx.de> - 2012-07-21 23:31 +0000
Re: What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-07-21 21:57 -0700
Re: What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ? Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-07-22 17:27 +0300
Re: What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-09-07 11:15 -0700
Re: What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ? Martin Shobe <martin.shobe@yahoo.com> - 2012-07-22 18:43 +0000
Re: What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-09-07 10:14 -0700
Re: What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ? Ralf Damaschke <rwspam@gmx.de> - 2012-07-22 22:43 +0000
Re: What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-09-07 10:59 -0700
Re: What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-07-22 02:43 +0100
Re: What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-07-21 22:05 -0700
Re: What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ? Seungbeom Kim <musiphil@bawi.org> - 2012-07-22 03:20 -0700
Re: What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-07-22 14:25 +0100
Re: What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ? "Bill Leary" <Bill_Leary@msn.com> - 2012-07-22 18:56 -0400
Re: What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-07-23 01:37 +0100
Re: What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ? "Bill Leary" <Bill_Leary@msn.com> - 2012-07-23 07:27 -0400
Re: What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ? Ike Naar <ike@sverige.freeshell.org> - 2012-07-23 06:45 +0000
Re: What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ? "Bill Leary" <Bill_Leary@msn.com> - 2012-07-23 07:37 -0400
Re: What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ? Ike Naar <ike@sverige.freeshell.org> - 2012-07-23 06:49 +0000
Re: What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-07-23 12:42 +0100
Re: What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ? Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2012-07-20 15:58 +0200
Re: What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ? Xavier Roche <xroche@free.fr.NOSPAM.invalid> - 2012-07-20 16:02 +0200
Re: What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ? Noob <root@127.0.0.1> - 2012-07-20 16:22 +0200
Re: What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ? Xavier Roche <xroche@free.fr.NOSPAM.invalid> - 2012-07-20 16:26 +0200
Re: What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ? Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2012-07-20 15:11 -0400
Re: What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ? Robert Miles <milesrf@Usenet-News.net> - 2012-08-25 00:16 -0500
Re: What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ? Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2012-07-20 15:10 -0400
Re: What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ? jacob navia <jacob@spamsink.net> - 2012-07-20 18:15 +0200
Re: What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-07-20 09:51 -0700
Re: What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ? pete <pfiland@mindspring.com> - 2012-07-20 20:29 -0400
Re: What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-07-20 20:25 -0700
Re: What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ? Phil Carmody <thefatphil_demunged@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-07-21 22:22 +0300
Re: What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-07-21 14:54 -0700
Re: expressions, evaluations, and values (was: What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ?) Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-07-21 14:52 -0700
Re: What shall return "0.0 ? 1 : 0" ? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-07-20 10:08 -0700
csiph-web