Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: ridiculous warning or not? |
| Date | 2012-09-07 19:26 -0700 |
| Organization | None to speak of |
| Message-ID | <ln627pl06u.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> (permalink) |
| References | <f87cd21e-eec8-4085-93c9-9315da17e455@googlegroups.com> <0.2721fc1ff3b8371a7969.20120821014136BST.87628d5b5r.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <kfnwr05khj3.fsf@x-alumni2.alumni.caltech.edu> <0.50c65ba5461bf0106f8c.20120908002514BST.87mx11pg9x.fsf@bsb.me.uk> <kfn627pff7r.fsf@x-alumni2.alumni.caltech.edu> |
Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
[...]
> Now apply that to a tentative definition for an array,
> but with the array having an incomplete type:
>
> int some_array[]; // tentative
>
> ... no explicit definition, hence ...
>
> int some_array[] = { 0 }; // this definition supplied implicitly
>
> You see how the default sizing rule falls out of the rule
> for default initialization of objects tentatively defined
> but not explicitly defined? That rule wasn't written with
> incomplete types in mind (I am guessing), but it has the
> effect of completing them in the case of incomplete arrays.
I don't believe the normative wording actually says that, because of
a quibble about the phrase "equal to 0". I've posted to comp.std.c,
subject "Tentative array object definition".
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst-u@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Will write code for food.
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
ridiculous warning or not? kerravon <kerravon@w3.to> - 2012-08-20 02:41 -0700
Re: ridiculous warning or not? Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-08-20 07:55 -0400
Re: ridiculous warning or not? army1987 <army1987@ask-for-it.invalid> - 2012-08-20 19:11 +0000
Re: ridiculous warning or not? Kenneth Brody <kenbrody@spamcop.net> - 2012-08-20 16:09 -0400
Re: ridiculous warning or not? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-09-07 07:29 -0700
Re: ridiculous warning or not? Andrew Cooper <amc96@cam.ac.uk> - 2012-08-21 00:36 +0100
Re: ridiculous warning or not? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-08-21 01:41 +0100
Re: ridiculous warning or not? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-08-20 18:59 -0700
Re: ridiculous warning or not? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-09-07 08:03 -0700
Re: ridiculous warning or not? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-09-07 14:37 -0700
Re: ridiculous warning or not? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-09-07 19:17 -0700
Re: ridiculous warning or not? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-09-07 19:56 -0700
Re: ridiculous warning or not? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-09-08 06:30 -0700
Re: ridiculous warning or not? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-09-07 07:57 -0700
Re: ridiculous warning or not? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-09-08 00:25 +0100
Re: ridiculous warning or not? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-09-07 18:58 -0700
Re: ridiculous warning or not? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-09-07 19:26 -0700
Re: ridiculous warning or not? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-09-08 06:26 -0700
Re: ridiculous warning or not? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-09-08 11:33 -0700
Re: ridiculous warning or not? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-12-17 14:39 -0800
Re: ridiculous warning or not? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-12-17 15:56 -0800
Re: ridiculous warning or not? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-12-20 10:31 -0800
Re: ridiculous warning or not? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-12-20 16:57 -0800
Re: ridiculous warning or not? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-12-21 03:11 +0000
Re: ridiculous warning or not? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-12-21 09:06 -0800
Re: ridiculous warning or not? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-09-08 03:42 +0100
Re: ridiculous warning or not? Tim Rentsch <txr@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2012-09-08 06:01 -0700
Re: ridiculous warning or not? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-09-08 14:45 +0100
Re: ridiculous warning or not? Keith Thompson <kst-u@mib.org> - 2012-09-08 11:28 -0700
Re: ridiculous warning or not? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-09-08 22:53 +0100
Re: ridiculous warning or not? kerravon <kerravon@w3.to> - 2012-08-21 03:25 -0700
Re: ridiculous warning or not? 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-08-21 11:20 -0700
Re: ridiculous warning or not? Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2012-08-21 21:07 +0100
Re: ridiculous warning or not? 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-08-21 14:39 -0700
Re: ridiculous warning or not? Ike Naar <ike@iceland.freeshell.org> - 2012-08-21 22:09 +0000
Re: ridiculous warning or not? 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-08-21 15:13 -0700
Re: ridiculous warning or not? Fred K <fred.l.kleinschmidt@gmail.com> - 2012-08-22 07:17 -0700
csiph-web